Influences of Chemical and Nonchemical Stressors on Health and Quality of Life in Fenceline Communities: A Community-Based Participatory Research Survey in Southeastern Pennsylvania.

IF 1.3 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Andrea A Chiger, Echo Alford, Kearni N Warren, Eve S Miari, Lora Snyder, Thom Nixon, Alexis Lightner, Ryan D Kennedy, Mary A Fox, Peter F DeCarlo, Keeve E Nachman, Sara N Lupolt
{"title":"Influences of Chemical and Nonchemical Stressors on Health and Quality of Life in Fenceline Communities: A Community-Based Participatory Research Survey in Southeastern Pennsylvania.","authors":"Andrea A Chiger, Echo Alford, Kearni N Warren, Eve S Miari, Lora Snyder, Thom Nixon, Alexis Lightner, Ryan D Kennedy, Mary A Fox, Peter F DeCarlo, Keeve E Nachman, Sara N Lupolt","doi":"10.1089/env.2024.0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community organizers in Southern Delaware County, PA, expressed a desire to collect comprehensive data on environmental, health, and social conditions in their neighborhoods to inform advocacy efforts to prompt public health action.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach, our team of academic and community coinvestigators developed an online community health survey to characterize residents' health concerns and the strengths, burdens, and needs of fenceline communities in Southern Delaware County. We included questions on chemical exposures, sources of pollution, financial stressors, health care, medical conditions, and priorities for policymakers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported experiencing adverse effects of poor air quality, odors, and noise in their communities. Eighty-six percent of participants reported experiencing at least two nonchemical stressors, such as poor housing conditions, food insecurity, and experiences of racism and discrimination. We found high proportions of reported asthma diagnoses and symptoms in participants and the children living in their households. Symptoms of asthma, depression, and anxiety were more common than clinician diagnoses of these conditions. Participants also commonly reported decreased quality of life or functioning associated with physical and mental health issues.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings highlight the importance of characterizing chemical and nonchemical stressors among residents in fenceline communities and expanding consideration of health to include acute symptoms, well-being, and quality of life. Our study was strengthened by our CBPR approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our work demonstrates the value of assessing cumulative impacts and employing CBPR approaches in fenceline communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12381651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2024.0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community organizers in Southern Delaware County, PA, expressed a desire to collect comprehensive data on environmental, health, and social conditions in their neighborhoods to inform advocacy efforts to prompt public health action.

Methods: Using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach, our team of academic and community coinvestigators developed an online community health survey to characterize residents' health concerns and the strengths, burdens, and needs of fenceline communities in Southern Delaware County. We included questions on chemical exposures, sources of pollution, financial stressors, health care, medical conditions, and priorities for policymakers.

Results: Participants reported experiencing adverse effects of poor air quality, odors, and noise in their communities. Eighty-six percent of participants reported experiencing at least two nonchemical stressors, such as poor housing conditions, food insecurity, and experiences of racism and discrimination. We found high proportions of reported asthma diagnoses and symptoms in participants and the children living in their households. Symptoms of asthma, depression, and anxiety were more common than clinician diagnoses of these conditions. Participants also commonly reported decreased quality of life or functioning associated with physical and mental health issues.

Discussion: Our findings highlight the importance of characterizing chemical and nonchemical stressors among residents in fenceline communities and expanding consideration of health to include acute symptoms, well-being, and quality of life. Our study was strengthened by our CBPR approach.

Conclusion: Our work demonstrates the value of assessing cumulative impacts and employing CBPR approaches in fenceline communities.

化学和非化学应激源对围篱社区居民健康和生活质量的影响:宾夕法尼亚州东南部社区参与性研究
背景:宾夕法尼亚州南特拉华县的社区组织者表示希望收集有关其社区环境、健康和社会状况的全面数据,以便为宣传工作提供信息,以促进公共卫生行动。方法:采用基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法,我们的学术和社区共同调查员团队开发了一项在线社区健康调查,以表征南特拉华县围栏社区居民的健康问题以及优势、负担和需求。我们包括了化学品暴露、污染源、财务压力、卫生保健、医疗条件和政策制定者优先考虑的问题。结果:参与者报告了他们社区空气质量差、气味和噪音的不良影响。86%的参与者报告说经历了至少两种非化学压力源,如恶劣的住房条件、食品不安全、种族主义和歧视的经历。我们发现,报告的哮喘诊断和症状在参与者及其家庭中的儿童中所占比例很高。哮喘、抑郁和焦虑的症状比临床医生对这些疾病的诊断更为常见。参与者还普遍报告与身心健康问题相关的生活质量或功能下降。讨论:我们的研究结果强调了在围栏社区居民中描述化学和非化学压力源的重要性,并扩大了对健康的考虑,包括急性症状、幸福感和生活质量。我们的CBPR方法加强了我们的研究。结论:我们的工作证明了在围栏社区评估累积影响和采用CBPR方法的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Environmental Justice, a quarterly peer-reviewed journal, is the central forum for the research, debate, and discussion of the equitable treatment and involvement of all people, especially minority and low-income populations, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The Journal explores the adverse and disparate environmental burden impacting marginalized populations and communities all over the world. Environmental Justice draws upon the expertise and perspectives of all parties involved in environmental justice struggles: communities, industry, academia, government, and nonprofit organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信