Effects of myotherapy combined with photobiomodulation on the lips: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 0.8 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/e20240144pt
Mariana Rodrigues Batista, Andréa Rodrigues Motta, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Furlan
{"title":"Effects of myotherapy combined with photobiomodulation on the lips: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Mariana Rodrigues Batista, Andréa Rodrigues Motta, Renata Maria Moreira Moraes Furlan","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20240144pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>to compare the maximum pressure, average pressure, and labial resistance of healthy adults undergoing myotherapy combined with photobiomodulation at different doses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted. The non-probabilistic sample consisted of 12 individuals with a mean age of 21.8 years, randomly assigned to three distinct groups for intervention with photobiomodulation. The exercises were the same for all participants. In group 1 (G1), participants received photobiomodulation at a dose of 7 J per point; in group 2 (G2), participants received 9 J per point; and in the placebo group (PG), participants underwent the same procedures as in the other groups, but the device was turned on without being activated (placebo). The wavelength used was infrared. Participants received photobiomodulation three times a week, with a 48-hour interval, for eight weeks. Myotherapy was performed at home by participants three times a day, five times a week, for eight weeks. Clinical assessment of the lips, maximum pressure, average pressure, and labial resistance were conducted using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) before and after intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no results indicating an increase in maximum or average lip pressure; however, there was an increase in labial resistance in G1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Photobiomodulation associated with myotherapy, with the parameters and methodology used in this study, did not result in an increase in lip pressure but promoted an increase in resistance in the group exposed to 7 J per point.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"37 4","pages":"e20240144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12419456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240144pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: to compare the maximum pressure, average pressure, and labial resistance of healthy adults undergoing myotherapy combined with photobiomodulation at different doses.

Methods: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted. The non-probabilistic sample consisted of 12 individuals with a mean age of 21.8 years, randomly assigned to three distinct groups for intervention with photobiomodulation. The exercises were the same for all participants. In group 1 (G1), participants received photobiomodulation at a dose of 7 J per point; in group 2 (G2), participants received 9 J per point; and in the placebo group (PG), participants underwent the same procedures as in the other groups, but the device was turned on without being activated (placebo). The wavelength used was infrared. Participants received photobiomodulation three times a week, with a 48-hour interval, for eight weeks. Myotherapy was performed at home by participants three times a day, five times a week, for eight weeks. Clinical assessment of the lips, maximum pressure, average pressure, and labial resistance were conducted using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) before and after intervention.

Results: There were no results indicating an increase in maximum or average lip pressure; however, there was an increase in labial resistance in G1.

Conclusion: Photobiomodulation associated with myotherapy, with the parameters and methodology used in this study, did not result in an increase in lip pressure but promoted an increase in resistance in the group exposed to 7 J per point.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肌肉疗法联合光生物调节对唇部的影响:一项随机临床试验。
目的:比较不同剂量肌疗联合光生物调节的健康成人最大压力、平均压力和唇阻力。方法:采用随机、双盲临床试验。非概率样本包括12名平均年龄为21.8岁的个体,随机分为三个不同的组进行光生物调节干预。所有参与者的练习都是一样的。在第一组(G1)中,参与者接受每点7 J剂量的光生物调节;在第二组(G2),参与者每分获得9个J;在安慰剂组(PG)中,参与者经历了与其他组相同的程序,但设备在没有激活的情况下被打开(安慰剂)。使用的波长是红外线。参与者每周接受三次光生物调节,间隔48小时,持续八周。肌肉疗法由参与者在家中进行,每天三次,每周五次,持续八周。采用爱荷华口腔性能仪(IOPI)对干预前后的唇部、最大压力、平均压力、唇阻力进行临床评估。结果:没有结果表明最大或平均唇压增加;然而,G1期唇部阻力增加。结论:在本研究中使用的参数和方法中,光生物调节与肌疗法相关,并未导致唇压增加,但促进了暴露于7 J /点组的阻力增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信