[Translated article] Cost-utility of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Spain.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Antonio García-Quintana, Héctor Alonso Ramos, Javier Parrondo
{"title":"[Translated article] Cost-utility of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in Spain.","authors":"Antonio García-Quintana, Héctor Alonso Ramos, Javier Parrondo","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2025.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heart failure is an increasingly common syndrome with a rising prevalence, which associates significant costs, mainly related to hospitalization. In fact, heart failure is the most frequent diagnosis in hospital discharges in Spain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the economic impact of new treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction such as sacubitril/valsartan in out-patient and in-patient setting.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The present economic evaluation study was carried out by developing a Markov model. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan from admission or after hospital discharge was compared, with enalapril being the comparator. Total costs, years of life gained, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio were analyzed. Data were obtained from the PARADIGM-HF and PIONEER-HF studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the base cases of the three comparisons made showed that sacubitril/valsartan produced benefits in years of life gained and quality-adjusted life years compared to enalapril showing incremental cost-utility ratio below €20,000/QALY and that this ratio was better in scenarios starting sacubitril/valsartan in the hospital setting once decompensation was resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that starting sacubitril/valsartan from hospital admission for heart failure is cost-effective from the perspective of the National Health Service in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2025.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure is an increasingly common syndrome with a rising prevalence, which associates significant costs, mainly related to hospitalization. In fact, heart failure is the most frequent diagnosis in hospital discharges in Spain.

Objective: To analyze the economic impact of new treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction such as sacubitril/valsartan in out-patient and in-patient setting.

Material and methods: The present economic evaluation study was carried out by developing a Markov model. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan from admission or after hospital discharge was compared, with enalapril being the comparator. Total costs, years of life gained, quality-adjusted life years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-utility ratio were analyzed. Data were obtained from the PARADIGM-HF and PIONEER-HF studies.

Results: The results of the base cases of the three comparisons made showed that sacubitril/valsartan produced benefits in years of life gained and quality-adjusted life years compared to enalapril showing incremental cost-utility ratio below €20,000/QALY and that this ratio was better in scenarios starting sacubitril/valsartan in the hospital setting once decompensation was resolved.

Conclusion: This study shows that starting sacubitril/valsartan from hospital admission for heart failure is cost-effective from the perspective of the National Health Service in Spain.

【翻译文章】在西班牙,苏比里尔/缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低的成本-效用。
导读:心力衰竭是一种越来越常见的综合征,发病率不断上升,这与显著的费用有关,主要与住院有关。事实上,心脏衰竭是西班牙出院患者中最常见的诊断。目的:分析舒比利/缬沙坦等降低射血分数心力衰竭新疗法在门诊和住院的经济影响。材料和方法:本研究采用马尔可夫模型进行经济评价。以依那普利为对照,比较了入院或出院后服用苏比里尔/缬沙坦的治疗。分析了总成本、获得寿命年、质量调整寿命年、增量成本-效果比和增量成本-效用比。数据来自PARADIGM-HF和PIONEER-HF研究。结果:三个比较的基本案例的结果显示,与依那普利相比,沙比利/缬沙坦在获得的生命年数和质量调整生命年数方面产生了益处,其增量成本效用比低于20,000欧元/QALY,并且在医院环境中开始使用沙比利/缬沙坦的情况下,一旦失代偿得到解决,该比率更好。结论:本研究表明,从西班牙国家卫生服务的角度来看,从心力衰竭住院开始服用苏比里尔/缬沙坦具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信