Mendel randomization confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease may increase the risk of mental disorders.

IF 1.1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Yang Wu, Tian Li, Yanan Zhang, Chujiang Wu, Xiaofeng Zheng, Xiaohui Yu, Jiucong Zhang
{"title":"Mendel randomization confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease may increase the risk of mental disorders.","authors":"Yang Wu, Tian Li, Yanan Zhang, Chujiang Wu, Xiaofeng Zheng, Xiaohui Yu, Jiucong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s40211-025-00546-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The potential causal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and mental disorder was analyzed using the mendelian randomization (MR) method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are derived from genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data, using gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as the exposure factor. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with GERD were selected as instrumental variables (IVs), and mental disorders (bipolar disorder, major depression, Alzheimer's disease, anorexia nervosa, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder) were used as outcome variables. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method is used as the main analysis method, and MR-Egger regression, weighted median (WM) method, simple mode and weighted mode are used as supplementary methods for Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Cochran's Q test and P value are used to quantify heterogeneity, MR-Egger regression was used to evaluate the multilevel effect test of SNPs, and leave-one-out method to determine whether there are potential SNPs, and to evaluate the stability of the results. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect indicators to evaluate whether there is a causal relationship between GERD and mental disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IVW demonstrated a causal relationship between GERD and bipolar disorder (OR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.39-2.09, P < 0.05) and anorexia nervosa (OR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.52-0.99, P < 0.05). Furthermore, there is a weak causal relationship between GERD and major depression (OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 1.01-1.02, P < 0.05) and anxiety (OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 1.01-1.01, P < 0.05). Similarly, there is no evidence of a causal relationship between GERD and Alzheimer's disease (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.87-1.03, P > 0.05) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.67-1.36, P > 0.05). Cochran's Q test for heterogeneity shows that there is no significant heterogeneity (P > 0.05) for bipolar disorder, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, major depression, Alzheimer's disease, and anorexia nervosa have some degree of heterogeneity (P < 0.05). Horizontal pleiotropic analysis showed that the P values for six mental disorders (0.750, 0.296, 0.154, 0.798, 0.893, 0.451) were all greater than 0.05. Leave-one-out analysis and funnel plot showed that MR analysis results can be considered relatively stable. All F are > 10, indicating no weak IVs bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GERD can obviously increase the risk of bipolar disorder; the increased risk of anxiety disorder is very slight. There is no clear evidence to support the causal relationship between GERD and four other mental disorders, including major depression, Alzheimer's disease, anorexia nervosa, and obsessive-compulsive disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":44560,"journal":{"name":"NEUROPSYCHIATRIE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEUROPSYCHIATRIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40211-025-00546-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The potential causal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and mental disorder was analyzed using the mendelian randomization (MR) method.

Methods: Data are derived from genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data, using gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as the exposure factor. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly associated with GERD were selected as instrumental variables (IVs), and mental disorders (bipolar disorder, major depression, Alzheimer's disease, anorexia nervosa, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder) were used as outcome variables. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method is used as the main analysis method, and MR-Egger regression, weighted median (WM) method, simple mode and weighted mode are used as supplementary methods for Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Cochran's Q test and P value are used to quantify heterogeneity, MR-Egger regression was used to evaluate the multilevel effect test of SNPs, and leave-one-out method to determine whether there are potential SNPs, and to evaluate the stability of the results. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect indicators to evaluate whether there is a causal relationship between GERD and mental disorders.

Results: IVW demonstrated a causal relationship between GERD and bipolar disorder (OR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.39-2.09, P < 0.05) and anorexia nervosa (OR = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.52-0.99, P < 0.05). Furthermore, there is a weak causal relationship between GERD and major depression (OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 1.01-1.02, P < 0.05) and anxiety (OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 1.01-1.01, P < 0.05). Similarly, there is no evidence of a causal relationship between GERD and Alzheimer's disease (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.87-1.03, P > 0.05) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.67-1.36, P > 0.05). Cochran's Q test for heterogeneity shows that there is no significant heterogeneity (P > 0.05) for bipolar disorder, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. However, major depression, Alzheimer's disease, and anorexia nervosa have some degree of heterogeneity (P < 0.05). Horizontal pleiotropic analysis showed that the P values for six mental disorders (0.750, 0.296, 0.154, 0.798, 0.893, 0.451) were all greater than 0.05. Leave-one-out analysis and funnel plot showed that MR analysis results can be considered relatively stable. All F are > 10, indicating no weak IVs bias.

Conclusion: GERD can obviously increase the risk of bipolar disorder; the increased risk of anxiety disorder is very slight. There is no clear evidence to support the causal relationship between GERD and four other mental disorders, including major depression, Alzheimer's disease, anorexia nervosa, and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

孟德尔随机化证实胃食管反流病可能增加精神障碍的风险。
背景:采用孟德尔随机化(MR)方法分析胃食管反流病(GERD)与精神障碍之间的潜在因果关系。方法:数据来源于全基因组关联研究(GWAS)汇总数据,以胃食管反流病(GERD)为暴露因素。选择与GERD显著相关的单核苷酸多态性(snp)作为工具变量(IVs),精神障碍(双相情感障碍、重度抑郁症、阿尔茨海默病、神经性厌食症、焦虑和强迫症)作为结果变量。以方差反加权(IVW)法为主要分析方法,孟德尔随机化(MR)分析以MR- egger回归、加权中位数(WM)法、简单模态和加权模态作为辅助分析方法。采用Cochran’s Q检验和P值量化异质性,采用MR-Egger回归评价snp的多水平效应检验,采用留一法判断是否存在潜在snp,并评价结果的稳定性。采用优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)作为效果指标评价胃食管反流与精神障碍之间是否存在因果关系。结果:IVW显示GERD与双相情感障碍(OR = 1.70,95%CI = 1.39-2.09,P 0.05)或强迫症(OR = 0.95,95%CI = 0.67-1.36,P > 0.05)有因果关系。Cochran's Q检验异质性显示双相情感障碍、焦虑和强迫症没有显著异质性(P > 0.05)。然而,重度抑郁症、阿尔茨海默病和神经性厌食症有一定程度的异质性(P 10),表明不存在弱IVs偏倚。结论:反流胃食管反流可明显增加双相情感障碍的发生风险;焦虑障碍风险的增加是非常轻微的。没有明确的证据支持胃食管反流与其他四种精神障碍之间的因果关系,包括重度抑郁症、阿尔茨海默病、神经性厌食症和强迫症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NEUROPSYCHIATRIE
NEUROPSYCHIATRIE PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Die Zeitschrift ist das offizielle Organ der „Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik (ÖGPP)'', und wissenschaftliches Organ der Österreichischen Alzheimer Gesellschaft, der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, der Österreichischen Schizophreniegesellschaft, und der pro mente austria - Österreichischer Dachverband der Vereine und Gesellschaften für psychische und soziale Gesundheit.Sie veröffentlicht Übersichten zu relevanten Themen des Fachs, Originalarbeiten, Kasuistiken sowie Briefe an die Herausgeber. Zudem wird auch Buchbesprechungen sowie Neuigkeiten aus den Bereichen Personalia, Standes- und Berufspolitik sowie Kongressankündigungen Raum gewidmet.Thematisch ist das Fach Psychiatrie und die Methoden der Psychotherapie in allen ihren Facetten vertreten. Die Zeitschrift richtet sich somit an alle Berufsgruppen, die sich mit Ursachen, Erscheinungsformen und Behandlungsmöglichkeiten von psychischen Störungen beschäftigen.  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------·        The professional and educational journal of the Austrian Society of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik; ÖGPP) and the Austrian Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy (Österreichische Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie; ÖGKJP)·        Overviews of all relevant topics pertaining to the discipline·        Intended for all occupational groups committed to the causes and manifestations of, as well as therapy options for psychic disorders·        All manuscripts principally pass through a double-blind peer review process involving at least two independent expertsThe official journal of the Austrian Societies of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (ÖGPP) and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy (ÖGKJP)The journal publishes overviews of relevant issues in the field, original work, case reports and letters to the editors. In addition, space is devoted to book reviews, news from the areas of personnel matters and professional policies, and conference announcements.Thematically, the discipline of psychiatry and the methods of psychotherapy are represented in all their facets. The journal is thus aimed at all professional groups committed to the causes and manifestations of, as well as therapy options for psychic disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信