{"title":"Aspects of Self-Management After Solid Organ Transplantation-A Scoping Review.","authors":"Stefan Jobst, Christiane Kugler, Anne Rebafka","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15080304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Solid organ transplantation improves survival and quality of life but requires lifelong self-management. While models exist for kidney and liver recipients, a comprehensive framework for all solid organ transplant recipients is lacking. Addressing this gap is essential for optimizing post-transplant care. <b>Objectives</b>: This report aims to conceptualize self-management after solid organ transplantation by addressing questions related to (1) the contexts studied to date, (2) research methodologies and publication types used, and (3) core aspects associated with self-management post-transplantation. <b>Methods</b>: A scoping review was used to address the above objectives. A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies, followed by systematic screening, data extraction, and qualitative content analysis. Findings were categorized using a deductive-inductive coding approach to map core self-management aspects after solid organ transplantation. <b>Results</b>: The search yielded 34,417 records, with 742 ultimately included. Publications from 43 countries spanned 43 years, with many (48.9%) published after 2016. Research articles dominated (80.1%), covering kidney (61%), liver (22%), heart (21%), and lung (16%) transplants. A qualitative analysis identified four self-management domains containing various categories: (1) Managing the medical-therapeutic regimen, (2) managing biographical work, (3) managing (new) life roles, and (4) generic self-management skills. The conceptual model illustrates their interconnections, with aspects of the medical-therapeutic regimen management most frequently covered. <b>Conclusions</b>: Self-management after solid organ transplantation is complex, involving medical-therapeutic, emotional, social, and behavioral aspects. Aspects of managing the medical-therapeutic regimen dominate the research literature, while other aspects need further exploration. Future studies should address gaps to support holistic, patient-centered post-transplant care strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15080304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Solid organ transplantation improves survival and quality of life but requires lifelong self-management. While models exist for kidney and liver recipients, a comprehensive framework for all solid organ transplant recipients is lacking. Addressing this gap is essential for optimizing post-transplant care. Objectives: This report aims to conceptualize self-management after solid organ transplantation by addressing questions related to (1) the contexts studied to date, (2) research methodologies and publication types used, and (3) core aspects associated with self-management post-transplantation. Methods: A scoping review was used to address the above objectives. A comprehensive search strategy identified relevant studies, followed by systematic screening, data extraction, and qualitative content analysis. Findings were categorized using a deductive-inductive coding approach to map core self-management aspects after solid organ transplantation. Results: The search yielded 34,417 records, with 742 ultimately included. Publications from 43 countries spanned 43 years, with many (48.9%) published after 2016. Research articles dominated (80.1%), covering kidney (61%), liver (22%), heart (21%), and lung (16%) transplants. A qualitative analysis identified four self-management domains containing various categories: (1) Managing the medical-therapeutic regimen, (2) managing biographical work, (3) managing (new) life roles, and (4) generic self-management skills. The conceptual model illustrates their interconnections, with aspects of the medical-therapeutic regimen management most frequently covered. Conclusions: Self-management after solid organ transplantation is complex, involving medical-therapeutic, emotional, social, and behavioral aspects. Aspects of managing the medical-therapeutic regimen dominate the research literature, while other aspects need further exploration. Future studies should address gaps to support holistic, patient-centered post-transplant care strategies.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.