2025 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Transitional Understanding of Kindness in Medical Students.

Q4 Medicine
Madigan Moore
{"title":"2025 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Transitional Understanding of Kindness in Medical Students.","authors":"Madigan Moore","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Humanistic qualities have been noted to be of importance in the patient-physician relationship. The patient-physician relationship can influence health outcomes. Research has shown that focusing on these qualities in the medical school curriculum can foster these qualities. In the current study, researchers chose to focus on the humanistic quality of kindness. This is a qualitative study assessing how students understand kindness in medicine both before and after their immersion in the clinical environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The subjects for this study were students of the class of 2025 at the University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine. Phase I took place during, towards the end of, or shortly after didactic training (Pillar I and Pillar II). Ten students completed a 3-question demographic survey, a 30-minute individual interview about their experiences of kindness in medicine, and 9-students participated in a one-hour focus group discussion. Phase II consisted of 9-individual student interviews and an 8-student focus group once students had completed at least a year of clinical experience (Pillar II and Pillar III).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10-students volunteered for phase I of the study; 9-students moved on to complete phase II of the study. The data collected for this study consisted of audio-recorded interviews, which were transcribed. The transcripts were then analyzed for qualitative themes by two separate researchers using conventional content analysis. The main themes derived from the data were definition of kindness, clinical environments, how providers practiced kindness, and ethics. Subthemes were derived from these main themes to further compare the data between Phase I and Phase II.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This was a qualitative study assessing students' understanding of kindness in medicine. The themes of definition of kindness, clinical environments, how providers practiced kindness, and ethics were derived from the qualitative data. Important findings include the loss of kindness in negative clinical environments, the emphasis students placed on kindness being a decision in the clinical environment, the importance of context to kindness, and exposure to clinical environments aiding students' preparedness to face ethical challenges. Future work could investigate integration of humanistic values such as kindness into the medical school curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"78 9","pages":"411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Humanistic qualities have been noted to be of importance in the patient-physician relationship. The patient-physician relationship can influence health outcomes. Research has shown that focusing on these qualities in the medical school curriculum can foster these qualities. In the current study, researchers chose to focus on the humanistic quality of kindness. This is a qualitative study assessing how students understand kindness in medicine both before and after their immersion in the clinical environment.

Methods: The subjects for this study were students of the class of 2025 at the University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine. Phase I took place during, towards the end of, or shortly after didactic training (Pillar I and Pillar II). Ten students completed a 3-question demographic survey, a 30-minute individual interview about their experiences of kindness in medicine, and 9-students participated in a one-hour focus group discussion. Phase II consisted of 9-individual student interviews and an 8-student focus group once students had completed at least a year of clinical experience (Pillar II and Pillar III).

Results: A total of 10-students volunteered for phase I of the study; 9-students moved on to complete phase II of the study. The data collected for this study consisted of audio-recorded interviews, which were transcribed. The transcripts were then analyzed for qualitative themes by two separate researchers using conventional content analysis. The main themes derived from the data were definition of kindness, clinical environments, how providers practiced kindness, and ethics. Subthemes were derived from these main themes to further compare the data between Phase I and Phase II.

Conclusion: This was a qualitative study assessing students' understanding of kindness in medicine. The themes of definition of kindness, clinical environments, how providers practiced kindness, and ethics were derived from the qualitative data. Important findings include the loss of kindness in negative clinical environments, the emphasis students placed on kindness being a decision in the clinical environment, the importance of context to kindness, and exposure to clinical environments aiding students' preparedness to face ethical challenges. Future work could investigate integration of humanistic values such as kindness into the medical school curriculum.

2025学者研究研讨会摘要:医学生对善意的过渡性理解。
引言:人文素质在医患关系中被认为是非常重要的。医患关系可以影响健康结果。研究表明,在医学院课程中注重这些品质可以培养这些品质。在目前的研究中,研究者选择关注善良的人文品质。这是一项定性研究,评估学生在浸入临床环境之前和之后如何理解医学中的善良。方法:以南达科他州大学桑福德医学院2025级学生为研究对象。第一阶段发生在教学训练(支柱一和支柱二)期间、接近尾声或之后不久。10名学生完成了一项包含3个问题的人口统计调查,对他们在医学中的善良经历进行了30分钟的个人访谈,9名学生参加了一个小时的焦点小组讨论。第二阶段包括9名学生访谈和8名学生焦点小组,一旦学生完成了至少一年的临床经验(支柱II和支柱III)。结果:共有10名学生自愿参加第一阶段的研究;9名学生继续完成研究的第二阶段。本研究收集的数据包括录音访谈,并进行转录。然后由两个独立的研究人员使用传统的内容分析来分析定性主题。从数据中得出的主要主题是善良的定义,临床环境,提供者如何实践善良和道德。从这些主题衍生出子主题,以进一步比较第一阶段和第二阶段的数据。结论:本研究为质性研究,评估学生对医学善良的理解。仁慈的定义、临床环境、提供者如何实践仁慈和伦理等主题来源于定性数据。重要的发现包括在消极的临床环境中善良的丧失,学生在临床环境中强调善良是一种决定,环境对善良的重要性,以及接触临床环境有助于学生准备面对伦理挑战。未来的工作可以研究将仁慈等人文价值融入医学院课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信