Evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and response regarding transfusion-transmitted infections in blood donors sero-reactive for viral markers during postdonation counselling as an attempt to identify and bridge the gaps in the blood donation process.

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-30 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_174_24
Anju Dubey, Atul Sonker
{"title":"Evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and response regarding transfusion-transmitted infections in blood donors sero-reactive for viral markers during postdonation counselling as an attempt to identify and bridge the gaps in the blood donation process.","authors":"Anju Dubey, Atul Sonker","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_174_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Donor notification and counseling have been mandated by the Indian action plan for blood safety to facilitate the early diagnosis and subsequent management of sero-reactive blood donors as well as to prevent the spread of infection through subsequent blood donations. This retrospective and questionnaire-based study was conducted with the aim of understanding the level of knowledge, difference in attitudes, and pattern of responses of sero-reactive blood donors which could aid in designing of clear and unambiguous donor educational program as well as enhance the effectiveness of donor selection procedures. Furthermore, the rates of donors' response to notification and compliance to clinical referral were assessed to find the areas which require improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood donors sero-reactive for viral markers were notified and subjected to postdonation counselling and were asked questions to assess their knowledge, attitude, and response. Retrospective analysis of data of 5 years was done. Donors were followed up by enquiring their status 6 months' postreferral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1991 repeat reactive blood donors, 1256 (63.08%) responded for counseling and referral. Long distance and busy schedule were the most common reasons for nonresponse. Lack of privacy and lack of understanding were the main reason for nondisclosure of pertinent information by blood donors. On follow-up, 634 (50.48%) of those counseled actually visited the prescribed referral center.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Donor counseling should be done by a trained counselor ensuring an understanding of the importance of transfusion-transmitted infection transmission. Donors should be informed about high-risk behavior and self-exclusion should be facilitated.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_174_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Donor notification and counseling have been mandated by the Indian action plan for blood safety to facilitate the early diagnosis and subsequent management of sero-reactive blood donors as well as to prevent the spread of infection through subsequent blood donations. This retrospective and questionnaire-based study was conducted with the aim of understanding the level of knowledge, difference in attitudes, and pattern of responses of sero-reactive blood donors which could aid in designing of clear and unambiguous donor educational program as well as enhance the effectiveness of donor selection procedures. Furthermore, the rates of donors' response to notification and compliance to clinical referral were assessed to find the areas which require improvement.

Methods: Blood donors sero-reactive for viral markers were notified and subjected to postdonation counselling and were asked questions to assess their knowledge, attitude, and response. Retrospective analysis of data of 5 years was done. Donors were followed up by enquiring their status 6 months' postreferral.

Results: Of the 1991 repeat reactive blood donors, 1256 (63.08%) responded for counseling and referral. Long distance and busy schedule were the most common reasons for nonresponse. Lack of privacy and lack of understanding were the main reason for nondisclosure of pertinent information by blood donors. On follow-up, 634 (50.48%) of those counseled actually visited the prescribed referral center.

Conclusion: Donor counseling should be done by a trained counselor ensuring an understanding of the importance of transfusion-transmitted infection transmission. Donors should be informed about high-risk behavior and self-exclusion should be facilitated.

在献血后咨询期间,评估献血者关于输血传播感染的知识、态度和反应,以确定和弥合献血过程中的差距。
背景:献血者通知和咨询已被印度血液安全行动计划授权,以促进对血清反应性献血者的早期诊断和后续管理,并防止通过后续献血传播感染。本研究旨在了解献血者的知识水平、态度差异和反应模式,以帮助设计清晰明确的献血者教育计划,并提高献血者选择程序的有效性。此外,还评估了捐助者对通知的反应率和对临床转诊的依从率,以找到需要改进的领域。方法:对病毒标志物血清反应的献血者进行通知,并进行献血后咨询,并询问他们的知识、态度和反应。回顾性分析5年资料。对捐赠者进行随访,询问他们产后6个月的状况。结果:1991例重复反应性献血者中,1256例(63.08%)接受咨询和转诊。距离遥远和日程繁忙是最常见的不回复原因。缺乏隐私和缺乏了解是献血者不披露相关信息的主要原因。在随访中,634人(50.48%)到指定的转介中心就诊。结论:献血者咨询应由训练有素的咨询师进行,确保了解输血传播感染传播的重要性。应告知捐助者高危行为,并应促进自我排斥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信