"When less is more and more is less" red cell alloimmunization in multitransfused patients attending a medical institution with a newly developed blood center in North India: A multifactorial study.

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_194_23
Ranjan Mukherjee, Gita Negi, Daljit Kaur, Uttam Kumar Nath, Yatendra Chaturvedi, Davood Bava
{"title":"\"When less is more and more is less\" red cell alloimmunization in multitransfused patients attending a medical institution with a newly developed blood center in North India: A multifactorial study.","authors":"Ranjan Mukherjee, Gita Negi, Daljit Kaur, Uttam Kumar Nath, Yatendra Chaturvedi, Davood Bava","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_194_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple blood transfusions with one or more nonself, genetically mismatched donor red blood cells (RBCs) may result in the production of alloantibodies, complicating future transfusions and increasing patient morbidity. This could be averted if adequate prophylactic measures are implemented in the vulnerable group. Due to the paucity of data in our region, we planned this study to identify the alloimmunization pattern in relation to clinical and demographic patient factors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was carried out in a newly developed Medical Institution of National importance in Northern India, for 1 year. The red cell antibody screening and identification were done for 770 patients receiving two or more transfusions. The patient and transfusion-related factors were statistically compared between alloimmunized and nonalloimmunized cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall seroprevalence of RBC alloimmunization among the multi-transfused patients was 4.02% (31/770). Thirty-six alloantibodies were identified in the 31 alloimmunized patients, which comprised 13 different alloantibody specificities. Most of them belonged to the Rh system (38.8%), followed by MNS (25%) and Lewis (27.7%) blood group systems. On Multivariate logistic regression analysis, the highest risk was found to be associated with recipients having more than three transfusions with an odds ratio of 8.4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest alloimmunization risk was found in multi-transfused patients receiving more than three transfusions and with female gender. Rh blood group system was found to be predominating the alloantibody specificity pattern. This highlights the need for the provision of extended Rh (DCcEe) matched packed red cells for susceptible patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_194_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple blood transfusions with one or more nonself, genetically mismatched donor red blood cells (RBCs) may result in the production of alloantibodies, complicating future transfusions and increasing patient morbidity. This could be averted if adequate prophylactic measures are implemented in the vulnerable group. Due to the paucity of data in our region, we planned this study to identify the alloimmunization pattern in relation to clinical and demographic patient factors.

Materials and methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in a newly developed Medical Institution of National importance in Northern India, for 1 year. The red cell antibody screening and identification were done for 770 patients receiving two or more transfusions. The patient and transfusion-related factors were statistically compared between alloimmunized and nonalloimmunized cases.

Results: The overall seroprevalence of RBC alloimmunization among the multi-transfused patients was 4.02% (31/770). Thirty-six alloantibodies were identified in the 31 alloimmunized patients, which comprised 13 different alloantibody specificities. Most of them belonged to the Rh system (38.8%), followed by MNS (25%) and Lewis (27.7%) blood group systems. On Multivariate logistic regression analysis, the highest risk was found to be associated with recipients having more than three transfusions with an odds ratio of 8.4.

Conclusions: The highest alloimmunization risk was found in multi-transfused patients receiving more than three transfusions and with female gender. Rh blood group system was found to be predominating the alloantibody specificity pattern. This highlights the need for the provision of extended Rh (DCcEe) matched packed red cells for susceptible patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

“少即是多,多即是少”在印度北部一家新开发的血液中心的医疗机构接受多次输血的患者的红细胞同种异体免疫:一项多因素研究。
用一个或多个非自身的、基因不匹配的供体红细胞(rbc)多次输血可能导致同种异体抗体的产生,使未来的输血复杂化并增加患者的发病率。如果在弱势群体中实施适当的预防措施,这种情况是可以避免的。由于本地区缺乏数据,我们计划进行这项研究,以确定与临床和人口统计学患者因素相关的同种异体免疫模式。材料和方法:一项前瞻性观察研究在印度北部新开发的国家级重要医疗机构进行,为期1年。对770例接受两次或两次以上输血的患者进行了红细胞抗体筛选和鉴定。对同种异体免疫和非同种异体免疫患者的患者及输血相关因素进行统计学比较。结果:多次输血患者红细胞同种异体免疫总体血清阳性率为4.02%(31/770)。在31例同种异体免疫患者中鉴定出36种同种异体抗体,包括13种不同的同种异体抗体特异性。Rh血型最多(38.8%),其次是MNS血型(25%)和Lewis血型(27.7%)。多变量logistic回归分析发现,输血次数超过三次的患者风险最高,比值比为8.4。结论:输血次数超过3次的女性患者发生同种异体免疫的风险最高。发现Rh血型系统在同种异体抗体特异性模式中占主导地位。这突出了为易感患者提供扩展Rh (DCcEe)匹配的填充红细胞的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信