2025 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Minimizing Grief and Loss Through Advanced Care Planning.

Q4 Medicine
Hannah Paauw
{"title":"2025 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Minimizing Grief and Loss Through Advanced Care Planning.","authors":"Hannah Paauw","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Advanced care planning (ACP) is a process that enables patients to specify their preferences for healthcare should they become unable to communicate their wishes. With the global population aged 60 and older comprising 11% of the total population-projected to rise to 22% by 2050-the need for ACP is increasingly urgent. This issue is even more pronounced in rural areas, like South Dakota, where older and sicker populations are disproportionately represented. Despite the numerous benefits of ACP, only 28% of adults in South Dakota have an advanced directive, and alarmingly, between 65% and 76% of physicians are unaware of their patients' existing advanced directives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthcare professionals who work with vulnerable adult populations were recruited through partnerships with long term care organizations and personnel to participate in an educational program. The program consisted of four separate one-hour long virtual sessions over the lunch hour once monthly and were designed to enhance understanding and use of ACP tools. The program consisted of four discussion-based sessions, focused on the personal grief experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and how it intersected with the practice of ACP. Half of each session involved didactics, and half was discussion-based facilitated by a physician with extensive long term care experience. Continued medical education credits were provided. Session topics included: 1. Moving forward after the Covid-19 pandemic, 2. Appropriate use of the Medical Order for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form 3. Shared decision making, and 4. Communicating when emotions are intense. Evaluation methods included pre- and post-program knowledge surveys and the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL), which assesses compassion, satisfaction, burnout, and secondary trauma stress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The program had variable attendance, with participants from diverse professional roles and settings including nursing, EMS workers, chaplains, administrators, social workers, hospice, community health workers, educators, and physicians. The first session had 58 participants, the second had 42, the third had decreased attendance at 23, and the fourth session had 53 total participants. Post-session evaluations revealed a small, statistically insignificant improvement across all ProQOL subcategories. Notable improvements were observed in participants' confidence and competence in using ACP tools appropriately.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The educational sessions successfully increased health care professionals' comfort in using ACP tools and enhanced their professional well-being. The sessions fostered valuable discussions among participants from various settings including long term care facilities, assisted living facilities, emergency services, and administration. Much of the discussion helped to address difficult topics related to end-of-life care. Despite positive outcomes, the study was limited by participants not completing all four sessions. Future research should explore the application of implementation science to better integrate ACP tools and training into clinical settings, enhancing both patient care and provider support.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"78 9","pages":"417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Advanced care planning (ACP) is a process that enables patients to specify their preferences for healthcare should they become unable to communicate their wishes. With the global population aged 60 and older comprising 11% of the total population-projected to rise to 22% by 2050-the need for ACP is increasingly urgent. This issue is even more pronounced in rural areas, like South Dakota, where older and sicker populations are disproportionately represented. Despite the numerous benefits of ACP, only 28% of adults in South Dakota have an advanced directive, and alarmingly, between 65% and 76% of physicians are unaware of their patients' existing advanced directives.

Methods: Healthcare professionals who work with vulnerable adult populations were recruited through partnerships with long term care organizations and personnel to participate in an educational program. The program consisted of four separate one-hour long virtual sessions over the lunch hour once monthly and were designed to enhance understanding and use of ACP tools. The program consisted of four discussion-based sessions, focused on the personal grief experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic and how it intersected with the practice of ACP. Half of each session involved didactics, and half was discussion-based facilitated by a physician with extensive long term care experience. Continued medical education credits were provided. Session topics included: 1. Moving forward after the Covid-19 pandemic, 2. Appropriate use of the Medical Order for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form 3. Shared decision making, and 4. Communicating when emotions are intense. Evaluation methods included pre- and post-program knowledge surveys and the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL), which assesses compassion, satisfaction, burnout, and secondary trauma stress.

Results: The program had variable attendance, with participants from diverse professional roles and settings including nursing, EMS workers, chaplains, administrators, social workers, hospice, community health workers, educators, and physicians. The first session had 58 participants, the second had 42, the third had decreased attendance at 23, and the fourth session had 53 total participants. Post-session evaluations revealed a small, statistically insignificant improvement across all ProQOL subcategories. Notable improvements were observed in participants' confidence and competence in using ACP tools appropriately.

Conclusions: The educational sessions successfully increased health care professionals' comfort in using ACP tools and enhanced their professional well-being. The sessions fostered valuable discussions among participants from various settings including long term care facilities, assisted living facilities, emergency services, and administration. Much of the discussion helped to address difficult topics related to end-of-life care. Despite positive outcomes, the study was limited by participants not completing all four sessions. Future research should explore the application of implementation science to better integrate ACP tools and training into clinical settings, enhancing both patient care and provider support.

2025学者研究研讨会摘要:通过先进的护理计划减少悲伤和损失。
先进的护理计划(ACP)是一个过程,使患者指定他们的医疗保健偏好,如果他们变得无法沟通他们的愿望。随着全球60岁及以上人口占总人口的11%,预计到2050年将上升到22%,对ACP的需求日益迫切。这个问题在农村地区更为明显,比如南达科他州,那里的老年人和体弱多病的人口比例过高。尽管ACP有很多好处,但在南达科他州,只有28%的成年人有预先指示,令人震惊的是,65%到76%的医生不知道他们的病人有预先指示。方法:通过与长期护理组织和人员的合作伙伴关系,招募易受伤害的成人人群的医疗保健专业人员参加教育计划。该计划包括每月一次午餐时间的四次单独的一小时长的虚拟会议,旨在提高对ACP工具的理解和使用。该计划包括四次以讨论为基础的会议,重点是在COVID-19大流行期间经历的个人悲伤,以及它如何与ACP的实践相结合。每次会议一半涉及教学,一半是由具有丰富长期护理经验的医生主持的讨论。提供继续医学教育学分。会议主题包括:1;在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后向前迈进;正确使用治疗范围医嘱(MOST)表3。3 .共同决策;在情绪紧张时进行沟通。评估方法包括计划前和计划后的知识调查和职业生活质量量表(ProQOL),评估同情心、满意度、倦怠和继发性创伤压力。结果:这个项目有不同的出勤率,参与者来自不同的专业角色和环境,包括护理、急救人员、牧师、行政人员、社会工作者、临终关怀、社区卫生工作者、教育工作者和医生。第一次会议有58人参加,第二次会议有42人参加,第三次会议出席人数减少到23人,第四次会议共有53人参加。会后评估显示,在所有ProQOL子类别中,有一个小的、统计上不显著的改善。在适当使用ACP工具时,观察到参与者的信心和能力显著提高。结论:教育课程成功地提高了卫生保健专业人员使用ACP工具的舒适度,提高了他们的职业幸福感。这些会议促进了来自各种环境的与会者之间的宝贵讨论,包括长期护理设施、辅助生活设施、紧急服务和管理。许多讨论有助于解决与临终关怀相关的难题。尽管有积极的结果,但研究受到参与者没有完成所有四个疗程的限制。未来的研究应探索实施科学的应用,以更好地将ACP工具和培训整合到临床环境中,加强患者护理和提供者支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信