2025 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Influence of Disability Education, Panel Discussion on Comfort and Knowledge of Healthcare Providers in South Dakota.

Q4 Medicine
Keely Walker
{"title":"2025 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Influence of Disability Education, Panel Discussion on Comfort and Knowledge of Healthcare Providers in South Dakota.","authors":"Keely Walker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>It is estimated that 27.2% of adults in the United States and 23.8% of people in South Dakota have a disability of some kind. Though individuals with disabilities are now recognized as an underserved population in healthcare, many disparities persist, infringing on the health of these individuals. A commonly cited barrier to receiving high quality care is provider misconceptions, and fallacies of life with disability. A minority of US medical schools have a specific disability curriculum. The University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine (USDSSOM) does not currently have specific training on disability beyond the medical and biological concepts. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of a two-session course designed to provide didactic information about caring for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and a hands-on panel discussion with patients with IDD and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from USD-SSOM to participate in a study including a two-session course to discuss guidelines for caring for patients with disabilities and providing exposure to the disability experience using a panel discussion. Participants were asked to complete a survey before and after each meeting. The survey contained open-ended questions and a series of 13 statements using a Likert scale for rating from \"strongly disagree\" to \"strongly agree.\" The ratings of the statements were converted to numerical values for analysis. The data were analyzed using a paired samples t-test to assess if there was a significant change in responses. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. The data from the first and second meetings were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Study participants (N=35) were primarily white medical students between the ages of 23 and 29, and a majority of responders endorsed fewer than five hours of formal training on caring for individuals with IDD. For both meetings participants had statistically significant changes in their responses to 11 of 13 survey statements. The first meeting, containing didactic education focused on caring for patients with IDD, showed the most difference in response to statements regarding capability of adapting communication and approach during a visit with a patient with IDD, with mean difference of 1.000. The second meeting, a 90-minute panel discussion led by the researchers with individuals with IDD and a caregiver, showed a mean difference of 1.667 in response to the statement about \"feeling capable of providing the same level of care to a patient regardless of disability status.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities face a multitude of health disparities that can be addressed, in part, by further training of medical professionals. This study demonstrated that medical students are interested in this topic. It further demonstrated that it is feasible to provide low cost, low resource programs that lead to the advancement of knowledge and competencies needed to improve care for persons with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"78 9","pages":"423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: It is estimated that 27.2% of adults in the United States and 23.8% of people in South Dakota have a disability of some kind. Though individuals with disabilities are now recognized as an underserved population in healthcare, many disparities persist, infringing on the health of these individuals. A commonly cited barrier to receiving high quality care is provider misconceptions, and fallacies of life with disability. A minority of US medical schools have a specific disability curriculum. The University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine (USDSSOM) does not currently have specific training on disability beyond the medical and biological concepts. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of a two-session course designed to provide didactic information about caring for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and a hands-on panel discussion with patients with IDD and their caregivers.

Methods: Participants were recruited from USD-SSOM to participate in a study including a two-session course to discuss guidelines for caring for patients with disabilities and providing exposure to the disability experience using a panel discussion. Participants were asked to complete a survey before and after each meeting. The survey contained open-ended questions and a series of 13 statements using a Likert scale for rating from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." The ratings of the statements were converted to numerical values for analysis. The data were analyzed using a paired samples t-test to assess if there was a significant change in responses. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. The data from the first and second meetings were analyzed separately.

Outcomes: Study participants (N=35) were primarily white medical students between the ages of 23 and 29, and a majority of responders endorsed fewer than five hours of formal training on caring for individuals with IDD. For both meetings participants had statistically significant changes in their responses to 11 of 13 survey statements. The first meeting, containing didactic education focused on caring for patients with IDD, showed the most difference in response to statements regarding capability of adapting communication and approach during a visit with a patient with IDD, with mean difference of 1.000. The second meeting, a 90-minute panel discussion led by the researchers with individuals with IDD and a caregiver, showed a mean difference of 1.667 in response to the statement about "feeling capable of providing the same level of care to a patient regardless of disability status."

Conclusions: Persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities face a multitude of health disparities that can be addressed, in part, by further training of medical professionals. This study demonstrated that medical students are interested in this topic. It further demonstrated that it is feasible to provide low cost, low resource programs that lead to the advancement of knowledge and competencies needed to improve care for persons with disabilities.

2025学者研究研讨会摘要:残疾教育对南达科他州医疗保健提供者舒适度和知识的影响,小组讨论。
导读:据估计,美国有27.2%的成年人和南达科他州有23.8%的人有某种残疾。虽然残疾人现在被认为是医疗保健服务不足的人群,但许多差距仍然存在,损害了这些人的健康。获得高质量护理的一个常见障碍是提供者的误解和对残疾生活的谬论。少数美国医学院设有专门的残疾人课程。南达科他州大学桑福德医学院(USDSSOM)目前在医学和生物学概念之外没有关于残疾的专门培训。本研究的目的是评估两期课程的有效性,该课程旨在提供关于照顾智力和发育障碍(IDD)患者的教学信息,并与IDD患者及其护理人员进行实际小组讨论。方法:从USD-SSOM招募参与者参加一项研究,包括两期课程,讨论照顾残疾患者的指导方针,并通过小组讨论提供残疾经验。参与者被要求在每次会议前后完成一份调查。该调查包括开放式问题和一系列13个陈述,使用李克特量表从“非常不同意”到“非常同意”进行评分。语句的评级被转换为数值以供分析。使用配对样本t检验对数据进行分析,以评估反应是否有显著变化。p值小于0.05被认为是显著的。第一次和第二次会议的数据分别进行了分析。结果:研究参与者(N=35)主要是年龄在23至29岁之间的白人医学院学生,大多数应答者认可在照顾IDD患者方面接受的正规培训少于5小时。在这两次会议上,参与者对13个调查陈述中的11个的回答在统计上都有显著的变化。第一次会议包含了以照顾IDD患者为重点的教学教育,在访问IDD患者期间,对有关适应沟通和方法能力的陈述的反应差异最大,平均差异为1000。在第二次会议上,研究人员与IDD患者和一名护理人员进行了90分钟的小组讨论,结果显示,在“无论残疾状况如何,都有能力为患者提供相同水平的护理”这一说法的回应中,平均差异为1.667。结论:智力和发育残疾者面临着许多健康差异,这些差异可以通过进一步培训医疗专业人员来部分解决。本研究表明医学生对这个话题很感兴趣。它进一步表明,提供低成本、低资源的项目是可行的,这些项目可以提高对残疾人的护理所需的知识和能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信