The relevance of nomograms for prediction of pelvic lymph node metastases in the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT era.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Urology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000290
Ofer N Gofrit, Marina Orevi, Simona Ben-Haim, Tzahi Meuman, Mordechai Duvdevani, Guy Hidas, Vladimir Yutkin
{"title":"The relevance of nomograms for prediction of pelvic lymph node metastases in the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT era.","authors":"Ofer N Gofrit, Marina Orevi, Simona Ben-Haim, Tzahi Meuman, Mordechai Duvdevani, Guy Hidas, Vladimir Yutkin","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Current guidelines suggest that the indications for pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) should rely on nomograms predicting their involvement. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand is gaining acceptance as routine diagnostic test before RP in patients with intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer (PC). In this study, we examined the effect of preoperative PET/CT on the accuracy of the nomograms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with intermediate/high risk PC showing no extraprostatic disease on PET/CT-PSMA underwent RP with PLND and were followed postoperatively for at least 6 months. Patients with detectable (>0.1 ng/mL) postoperative prostate-specific antigen levels underwent re-evaluation with PET/CT-PSMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 patients underwent RP for intermediate (34 patients) or high-risk disease (36 patients). According to the Partin, MSKCC, and Briganti 2012 nomograms, positive LNs were expected in 7, 13, and 12 patients, respectively. At PLND, 1 positive LN was found in a single patient (<i>p</i> < 0.05 compared with the expected number of patients from all nomograms). Postoperatively, 10 patients developed detectable prostate-specific antigen levels. One patient exhibited radioligand uptake that could indicate LN involvement. Considering these 2 patients as failures, the negative predictive value of PSMA-PET/CT for LN involvement was 97.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT with no extraprostatic uptake before RP in patients with intermediate to high-grade PC is highly accurate for ruling out LN involvement, superior to the routinely used nomograms. Its use induced stage migration, rendering predictive nomograms irrelevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":"19 5","pages":"353-356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Current guidelines suggest that the indications for pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) should rely on nomograms predicting their involvement. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand is gaining acceptance as routine diagnostic test before RP in patients with intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer (PC). In this study, we examined the effect of preoperative PET/CT on the accuracy of the nomograms.

Materials and methods: Patients with intermediate/high risk PC showing no extraprostatic disease on PET/CT-PSMA underwent RP with PLND and were followed postoperatively for at least 6 months. Patients with detectable (>0.1 ng/mL) postoperative prostate-specific antigen levels underwent re-evaluation with PET/CT-PSMA.

Results: A total of 70 patients underwent RP for intermediate (34 patients) or high-risk disease (36 patients). According to the Partin, MSKCC, and Briganti 2012 nomograms, positive LNs were expected in 7, 13, and 12 patients, respectively. At PLND, 1 positive LN was found in a single patient (p < 0.05 compared with the expected number of patients from all nomograms). Postoperatively, 10 patients developed detectable prostate-specific antigen levels. One patient exhibited radioligand uptake that could indicate LN involvement. Considering these 2 patients as failures, the negative predictive value of PSMA-PET/CT for LN involvement was 97.1%.

Conclusions: Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT with no extraprostatic uptake before RP in patients with intermediate to high-grade PC is highly accurate for ruling out LN involvement, superior to the routinely used nomograms. Its use induced stage migration, rendering predictive nomograms irrelevant.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)-PET/CT时代nomogram预测盆腔淋巴结转移的相关性
背景/目的:目前的指南建议根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中盆腔淋巴结(LN)清扫(PLND)的适应症应该依赖于预测其累及的形态图。前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)放射配体正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)作为中/高危前列腺癌(PC)患者RP前的常规诊断检查,越来越被接受。在这项研究中,我们检查了术前PET/CT对断层图准确性的影响。材料和方法:PET/CT-PSMA未显示前列腺外病变的中/高危PC患者行RP合并PLND,术后随访至少6个月。术后可检测到前列腺特异性抗原水平(>0.1 ng/mL)的患者通过PET/CT-PSMA重新评估。结果:共有70例患者接受了中度(34例)或高危(36例)疾病的RP。根据Partin、MSKCC和Briganti 2012 nomogram数据,预计分别有7例、13例和12例患者出现阳性ln。在PLND中,1例患者中发现1例LN阳性(与所有nomogram预期患者数相比,p < 0.05)。术后10例患者出现可检测到的前列腺特异性抗原水平。一名患者表现出放射性寡核苷酸摄取,可能表明淋巴结受累。考虑到这2例患者为失败,PSMA-PET/CT对LN累及的阴性预测值为97.1%。结论:术前PSMA-PET/CT在RP前未发现前列腺外摄取的中高级别PC患者排除LN累及的准确度高,优于常规使用的影像学检查。它的使用引起了阶段迁移,使预测图无关紧要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信