Ofer N Gofrit, Marina Orevi, Simona Ben-Haim, Tzahi Meuman, Mordechai Duvdevani, Guy Hidas, Vladimir Yutkin
{"title":"The relevance of nomograms for prediction of pelvic lymph node metastases in the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT era.","authors":"Ofer N Gofrit, Marina Orevi, Simona Ben-Haim, Tzahi Meuman, Mordechai Duvdevani, Guy Hidas, Vladimir Yutkin","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Current guidelines suggest that the indications for pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) should rely on nomograms predicting their involvement. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand is gaining acceptance as routine diagnostic test before RP in patients with intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer (PC). In this study, we examined the effect of preoperative PET/CT on the accuracy of the nomograms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with intermediate/high risk PC showing no extraprostatic disease on PET/CT-PSMA underwent RP with PLND and were followed postoperatively for at least 6 months. Patients with detectable (>0.1 ng/mL) postoperative prostate-specific antigen levels underwent re-evaluation with PET/CT-PSMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 70 patients underwent RP for intermediate (34 patients) or high-risk disease (36 patients). According to the Partin, MSKCC, and Briganti 2012 nomograms, positive LNs were expected in 7, 13, and 12 patients, respectively. At PLND, 1 positive LN was found in a single patient (<i>p</i> < 0.05 compared with the expected number of patients from all nomograms). Postoperatively, 10 patients developed detectable prostate-specific antigen levels. One patient exhibited radioligand uptake that could indicate LN involvement. Considering these 2 patients as failures, the negative predictive value of PSMA-PET/CT for LN involvement was 97.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT with no extraprostatic uptake before RP in patients with intermediate to high-grade PC is highly accurate for ruling out LN involvement, superior to the routinely used nomograms. Its use induced stage migration, rendering predictive nomograms irrelevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":"19 5","pages":"353-356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aims: Current guidelines suggest that the indications for pelvic lymph node (LN) dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) should rely on nomograms predicting their involvement. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand is gaining acceptance as routine diagnostic test before RP in patients with intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer (PC). In this study, we examined the effect of preoperative PET/CT on the accuracy of the nomograms.
Materials and methods: Patients with intermediate/high risk PC showing no extraprostatic disease on PET/CT-PSMA underwent RP with PLND and were followed postoperatively for at least 6 months. Patients with detectable (>0.1 ng/mL) postoperative prostate-specific antigen levels underwent re-evaluation with PET/CT-PSMA.
Results: A total of 70 patients underwent RP for intermediate (34 patients) or high-risk disease (36 patients). According to the Partin, MSKCC, and Briganti 2012 nomograms, positive LNs were expected in 7, 13, and 12 patients, respectively. At PLND, 1 positive LN was found in a single patient (p < 0.05 compared with the expected number of patients from all nomograms). Postoperatively, 10 patients developed detectable prostate-specific antigen levels. One patient exhibited radioligand uptake that could indicate LN involvement. Considering these 2 patients as failures, the negative predictive value of PSMA-PET/CT for LN involvement was 97.1%.
Conclusions: Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT with no extraprostatic uptake before RP in patients with intermediate to high-grade PC is highly accurate for ruling out LN involvement, superior to the routinely used nomograms. Its use induced stage migration, rendering predictive nomograms irrelevant.