Mini-Cog test predicts need for rehabilitation intervention during weaning after radical cystectomy.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Urology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-11 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000294
Shugo Yajima, Yasukazu Nakanishi, Rikuto Yasujima, Kohei Hirose, Yosuke Umino, Naoya Okubo, Madoka Kataoka, Hitoshi Masuda
{"title":"Mini-Cog test predicts need for rehabilitation intervention during weaning after radical cystectomy.","authors":"Shugo Yajima, Yasukazu Nakanishi, Rikuto Yasujima, Kohei Hirose, Yosuke Umino, Naoya Okubo, Madoka Kataoka, Hitoshi Masuda","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether preoperative cognitive screening using the Mini-Cognitive Assessment Instrument (Mini-Cog) was useful for predicting the need for postoperative rehabilitation intervention in patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We collected the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy and preoperative cognitive screening based on the Mini-Cog test in our department between 2020 and 2021 (n = 114). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the clinical risk factors for requiring rehabilitation intervention because of failure to wean postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the participants was 76 years, and 96 (84%) were male. Of the 114 patients, 31 (27%) required rehabilitation intervention for weaning. Based on the Mini-Cog test, the patients were classified into 2 groups: 22 (19%) had probable cognitive impairment (Mini-Cog score <3). Of the 22 patients with a Mini-Cog score of <3, 13 (59%) required rehabilitation intervention because of failure to wean postoperatively. In the multivariate analysis, being 75 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-36.3; <i>p</i> < 0.001), a Mini-Cog score of <3 (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.2-11.2; <i>p</i> = 0.02), and an operative time ≥310 minutes (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.9; <i>p</i> = 0.04) were independent risk factors for requiring postoperative rehabilitation intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective screening with the Mini-Cog test, a simple cognitive screening tool with only 2 components (delayed 3-word recall task and clock drawing), reflects not only cognitive function but also physical frailty and may lead to the establishment of appropriate rehabilitation programs during the perioperative period for early patient mobility after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":"19 5","pages":"347-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to determine whether preoperative cognitive screening using the Mini-Cognitive Assessment Instrument (Mini-Cog) was useful for predicting the need for postoperative rehabilitation intervention in patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy.

Materials and methods: We collected the medical records of consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy and preoperative cognitive screening based on the Mini-Cog test in our department between 2020 and 2021 (n = 114). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the clinical risk factors for requiring rehabilitation intervention because of failure to wean postoperatively.

Results: The median age of the participants was 76 years, and 96 (84%) were male. Of the 114 patients, 31 (27%) required rehabilitation intervention for weaning. Based on the Mini-Cog test, the patients were classified into 2 groups: 22 (19%) had probable cognitive impairment (Mini-Cog score <3). Of the 22 patients with a Mini-Cog score of <3, 13 (59%) required rehabilitation intervention because of failure to wean postoperatively. In the multivariate analysis, being 75 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 9.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-36.3; p < 0.001), a Mini-Cog score of <3 (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.2-11.2; p = 0.02), and an operative time ≥310 minutes (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.9; p = 0.04) were independent risk factors for requiring postoperative rehabilitation intervention.

Conclusions: Effective screening with the Mini-Cog test, a simple cognitive screening tool with only 2 components (delayed 3-word recall task and clock drawing), reflects not only cognitive function but also physical frailty and may lead to the establishment of appropriate rehabilitation programs during the perioperative period for early patient mobility after surgery.

Abstract Image

Mini-Cog试验预测根治性膀胱切除术后断奶期间康复干预的需要。
背景:本研究旨在确定使用mini -认知评估仪(Mini-Cog)进行术前认知筛查是否有助于预测膀胱癌根治性膀胱切除术患者术后康复干预的需要。材料与方法:收集2020 - 2021年我科连续行根治性膀胱切除术和术前Mini-Cog试验认知筛查的患者病历(n = 114)。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析确定因术后不能断奶而需要康复干预的临床危险因素。结果:参与者的中位年龄为76岁,其中96名(84%)为男性。114例患者中,31例(27%)需要康复干预以断奶。根据Mini-Cog测试,将患者分为两组:22例(19%)患者可能存在认知功能障碍(Mini-Cog评分p < 0.001), 1例Mini-Cog评分p = 0.02),手术时间≥310分钟(OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1 ~ 11.9; p = 0.04)为需要术后康复干预的独立危险因素。结论:Mini-Cog测试是一种简单的认知筛查工具,只有2个组成部分(延迟3字回忆任务和时钟绘制),它不仅能反映认知功能,还能反映身体虚弱程度,可以在围手术期建立适当的康复计划,促进患者术后早期活动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信