{"title":"[The Role of Task Prompts in Fostering Strategy Flexibility, Procedural, and Conceptual Knowledge when Solving Quadratic Equations].","authors":"Maurus Küttel, Christian Rüede, Fritz C Staub","doi":"10.1007/s13138-025-00262-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In secondary mathematics education, students are expected to apply procedures not only correctly but also flexibly, for example when solving quadratic equations. Tasks that deliberately stimulate cognitive and metacognitive processes support the development of such flexibility. The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between students' learning gains and the activation potential of the tasks provided. To this end, prompts included in tasks on solving quadratic equations based on a sample of 39 classes. In parallel, the learning gains of <i>N</i> = 739 students in these classes were measured over the course of an instructional unit on rule-based solving of quadratic equations.Linear regression analyses showed that (a) the development of strategy flexibility and procedural knowledge depends on the number of tasks that prompt students to compare worked-out solutions; (b) the development of strategy flexibility and conceptual knowledge depends on the number of tasks with metacognitively activating prompts; and (c) a high number of tasks with prompts that prescribe a specific procedure tend to hinder the development of strategy flexibility. These findings indicate that the activation potential of task prompts is a significant predictor of learning gains in solving quadratic equations.</p>","PeriodicalId":43968,"journal":{"name":"Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik","volume":"46 2","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal fur Mathematik-Didaktik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-025-00262-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In secondary mathematics education, students are expected to apply procedures not only correctly but also flexibly, for example when solving quadratic equations. Tasks that deliberately stimulate cognitive and metacognitive processes support the development of such flexibility. The aim of this paper is to investigate the relationship between students' learning gains and the activation potential of the tasks provided. To this end, prompts included in tasks on solving quadratic equations based on a sample of 39 classes. In parallel, the learning gains of N = 739 students in these classes were measured over the course of an instructional unit on rule-based solving of quadratic equations.Linear regression analyses showed that (a) the development of strategy flexibility and procedural knowledge depends on the number of tasks that prompt students to compare worked-out solutions; (b) the development of strategy flexibility and conceptual knowledge depends on the number of tasks with metacognitively activating prompts; and (c) a high number of tasks with prompts that prescribe a specific procedure tend to hinder the development of strategy flexibility. These findings indicate that the activation potential of task prompts is a significant predictor of learning gains in solving quadratic equations.
期刊介绍:
ZielsetzungenDas ''Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik'' (JMD) publiziert Originalbeiträge aus allen Bereichen mathematikdidaktischer Forschung und Entwicklung. Eingereichte Texte werden in der Regel von drei anonym bleibenden FachgutachterInnen bewertet, die das Herausgebergremium des JMD benennt. Das Herausgebergremium entscheidet aufgrund der Gutachten und eigener Fachkompetenz über das weitere Vorgehen (wie Ablehnung, eventuelle Änderungsauflagen und/oder den Abdruck des Textes im JMD). Das JMD ist offen für Forschungsarbeiten aus Bezugswissenschaften (wie Pädagogik, Psychologie, Soziologie oder Philosophie) und Nachbarwissenschaften (wie Didaktik der Physik oder Sprachdidaktik), sofern sich die Beiträge in ihrem Schwerpunkt auf das Lernen und Lehren von Mathematik beziehen.Das JMD ist das offizielle Organ der Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Mathematik (GDM).
Aims & ScopeThe “Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik” (JMD) publishes original work from all areas of research in mathematics education. Submitted articles will be anonymously reviewed by three experts who are appointed by the journals’ editors. The JMD is open to research in related disciplines (such as pedagogy, psychology, or science education), provided the main scope of the article remains the learning and teaching of mathematics.The JMD is the official journal of the GDM – Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Mathematik (Society of Didactics of Mathematics).