MRI R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping in brain tissue with extreme iron overload.

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Christoph Birkl, Marlene Panzer, Christian Kames, Anna Maria Birkl-Toeglhofer, Alexander Rauscher, Bernhard Glodny, Elke R Gizewski, Heinz Zoller
{"title":"MRI R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping in brain tissue with extreme iron overload.","authors":"Christoph Birkl, Marlene Panzer, Christian Kames, Anna Maria Birkl-Toeglhofer, Alexander Rauscher, Bernhard Glodny, Elke R Gizewski, Heinz Zoller","doi":"10.1186/s41747-025-00622-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) are regarded as robust techniques for assessing iron content in the brain. While these techniques are established for normal or moderate iron levels, their usability in extreme iron overload, as seen in aceruloplasminemia (ACP), is unclear. We aimed to evaluate various R2* and QSM algorithms in assessing brain iron levels in patients with ACP compared to healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We acquired a three-dimensional multiecho gradient-echo sequence for R2* and QSM in three patients with ACP and three healthy subjects. Six algorithms each for R2* and QSM were compared. QSM was performed with referencing to whole brain, to cerebrospinal fluid and without referencing. R2* and QSM values were assessed in the caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, and thalamus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>R2* values varied significantly across algorithms, particularly in the putamen (F(5,50) = 16.51, p < 0.001). For QSM, reference region choice (F(5,150) = 264, p < 0.001) and algorithm selection (F(2,9) = 10, p < 0.001) had an impact on susceptibility values. In patients, referencing to whole brain yielded lower susceptibility values than cerebrospinal fluid (median = 0.147 ppm, range = 0.527 ppm versus median = 0.279 ppm, range = 0.593 ppm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Extreme iron overload amplifies variability in R2* and QSM measurements. QSM referencing is particularly challenging in diffuse whole-brain iron accumulation; thus, analysis with multiple reference regions might mitigate bias. Both algorithm selection and referencing approaches play a pivotal role in determining measurement accuracy and clinical interpretation under extreme brain iron overload.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>As QSM transitions into clinical use, it will encounter cases of extreme iron overload. Our study in patients with aceruloplasminemia revealed that the choice of reference region significantly influences susceptibility values, with variations exceeding algorithm-dependent differences.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>R2* and QSM vary across algorithms in brain tissue with iron overload. Whole-brain referenced QSM leads to lower susceptibility values in aceruloplasminemia patients. QSM, if properly processed, provides reliable maps in iron overload brain regions. In brain regions with extremely high iron content, R2* mapping might fail.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"9 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-025-00622-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) are regarded as robust techniques for assessing iron content in the brain. While these techniques are established for normal or moderate iron levels, their usability in extreme iron overload, as seen in aceruloplasminemia (ACP), is unclear. We aimed to evaluate various R2* and QSM algorithms in assessing brain iron levels in patients with ACP compared to healthy controls.

Materials and methods: We acquired a three-dimensional multiecho gradient-echo sequence for R2* and QSM in three patients with ACP and three healthy subjects. Six algorithms each for R2* and QSM were compared. QSM was performed with referencing to whole brain, to cerebrospinal fluid and without referencing. R2* and QSM values were assessed in the caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, and thalamus.

Results: R2* values varied significantly across algorithms, particularly in the putamen (F(5,50) = 16.51, p < 0.001). For QSM, reference region choice (F(5,150) = 264, p < 0.001) and algorithm selection (F(2,9) = 10, p < 0.001) had an impact on susceptibility values. In patients, referencing to whole brain yielded lower susceptibility values than cerebrospinal fluid (median = 0.147 ppm, range = 0.527 ppm versus median = 0.279 ppm, range = 0.593 ppm).

Conclusion: Extreme iron overload amplifies variability in R2* and QSM measurements. QSM referencing is particularly challenging in diffuse whole-brain iron accumulation; thus, analysis with multiple reference regions might mitigate bias. Both algorithm selection and referencing approaches play a pivotal role in determining measurement accuracy and clinical interpretation under extreme brain iron overload.

Relevance statement: As QSM transitions into clinical use, it will encounter cases of extreme iron overload. Our study in patients with aceruloplasminemia revealed that the choice of reference region significantly influences susceptibility values, with variations exceeding algorithm-dependent differences.

Key points: R2* and QSM vary across algorithms in brain tissue with iron overload. Whole-brain referenced QSM leads to lower susceptibility values in aceruloplasminemia patients. QSM, if properly processed, provides reliable maps in iron overload brain regions. In brain regions with extremely high iron content, R2* mapping might fail.

极端铁超载脑组织的MRI R2*和定量易感性制图。
背景:R2*和定量易感性制图(QSM)被认为是评估脑内铁含量的可靠技术。虽然这些技术是为正常或中等铁水平而建立的,但它们在极端铁过载情况下的可用性,如在急性纤溶酶血症(ACP)中所见,尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估各种R2*和QSM算法在评估ACP患者与健康对照组相比的脑铁水平。材料与方法:获取3例ACP患者和3例健康受试者的R2*和QSM三维多回波梯度-回波序列。比较了R2*和QSM各6种算法。全脑对照、脑脊液对照和无对照QSM。评估尾状核、壳核、苍白球和丘脑的R2*和QSM值。结果:不同算法的R2*值差异显著,尤其是壳核(F(5,50) = 16.51, p)。结论:极端铁过载放大了R2*和QSM测量的变异性。在弥漫性全脑铁积累中引用QSM尤其具有挑战性;因此,使用多个参考区域进行分析可能会减轻偏差。在极端脑铁负荷下,算法选择和参考方法在确定测量精度和临床解释中起着关键作用。相关声明:随着QSM过渡到临床使用,它将遇到极端铁超载的情况。我们在急性纤溶酶血症患者中的研究表明,参考区域的选择显著影响敏感性值,其差异超过了算法依赖的差异。重点:R2*和QSM在铁过载的脑组织中不同的算法是不同的。全脑参考QSM导致急性纤溶酶血症患者的敏感性值较低。如果处理得当,QSM可以提供铁过载大脑区域的可靠地图。在铁含量极高的大脑区域,R2*映射可能会失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信