Engaging Young People With Mental Health Needs and Exploring Outputs From a Resource Development Project: Qualitative Interview Study.

Q2 Medicine
Zoë Haime, Charlotte Carney, Myles-Jay Linton, Helen Bould, Lucy Biddle
{"title":"Engaging Young People With Mental Health Needs and Exploring Outputs From a Resource Development Project: Qualitative Interview Study.","authors":"Zoë Haime, Charlotte Carney, Myles-Jay Linton, Helen Bould, Lucy Biddle","doi":"10.2196/74258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recommendations from professional bodies, including the Royal College of Psychiatrists, advise mental health practitioners to discuss problematic online use with children and young people. However, barriers such as knowledge gaps and low confidence in initiating discussions often prevent these conversations from happening.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Digital Dialogues project used a knowledge exchange approach, cocreating resources with young people, to support professionals in overcoming these challenges. This paper details the project design and reflects on the perspectives of the young people involved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project was guided by the \"children and young people have ownership\" model of cocreation. A total of 11 participants were purposively sampled to take part in the Digital Dialogues Young Persons Group (DDYPG) and were actively involved in the study workshops, creative tasks, and resource design and development. In total, 6 (55%) DDYPG members took part in interviews, and 2 (18%) also completed an anonymous survey evaluating their time in the DDYPG. Thematic analysis was used to explore data from interviews and qualitative survey responses together.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DDYPG successfully created several resources to support practitioners in addressing problematic online use with young people. Reflections from DDYPG members showed that creative engagement, meaningful involvement, and peer interactions were key motivators for participation and led to benefits, including feelings of empowerment and personal development. Anxiety, time demands, and potential exposure to triggering content could act as barriers. However, structured tasks, positive rapport with researchers, and flexible participation helped to mitigate these challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight ethical considerations and potential strategies for involving young people in resource development research projects in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"e74258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/74258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recommendations from professional bodies, including the Royal College of Psychiatrists, advise mental health practitioners to discuss problematic online use with children and young people. However, barriers such as knowledge gaps and low confidence in initiating discussions often prevent these conversations from happening.

Objective: The Digital Dialogues project used a knowledge exchange approach, cocreating resources with young people, to support professionals in overcoming these challenges. This paper details the project design and reflects on the perspectives of the young people involved.

Methods: The project was guided by the "children and young people have ownership" model of cocreation. A total of 11 participants were purposively sampled to take part in the Digital Dialogues Young Persons Group (DDYPG) and were actively involved in the study workshops, creative tasks, and resource design and development. In total, 6 (55%) DDYPG members took part in interviews, and 2 (18%) also completed an anonymous survey evaluating their time in the DDYPG. Thematic analysis was used to explore data from interviews and qualitative survey responses together.

Results: The DDYPG successfully created several resources to support practitioners in addressing problematic online use with young people. Reflections from DDYPG members showed that creative engagement, meaningful involvement, and peer interactions were key motivators for participation and led to benefits, including feelings of empowerment and personal development. Anxiety, time demands, and potential exposure to triggering content could act as barriers. However, structured tasks, positive rapport with researchers, and flexible participation helped to mitigate these challenges.

Conclusions: The findings highlight ethical considerations and potential strategies for involving young people in resource development research projects in the future.

Abstract Image

参与青少年的心理健康需求和探索资源开发项目的产出:定性访谈研究。
背景:包括皇家精神科医学院在内的专业机构建议精神卫生从业人员与儿童和年轻人讨论有问题的网络使用。然而,诸如知识差距和在发起讨论时缺乏信心等障碍往往会阻止这些对话的发生。目标:数字对话项目采用知识交流方式,与年轻人共同创造资源,支持专业人员克服这些挑战。本文详细介绍了项目设计,并反思了参与其中的年轻人的观点。方法:项目以“儿童和青少年拥有所有权”的共同创造模式为指导。共有11名参与者参加了数字对话青年小组(DDYPG),并积极参与了研究研讨会、创意任务和资源设计和开发。共有6名(55%)DDYPG成员参加了访谈,2名(18%)成员还完成了一项匿名调查,评估他们在DDYPG的时间。采用专题分析,从访谈和定性调查反馈中共同探索数据。结果:DDYPG成功地创建了一些资源,以支持从业者与年轻人一起解决在线使用问题。DDYPG成员的反思表明,创造性的参与、有意义的参与和同伴互动是参与的主要动力,并带来了好处,包括赋权和个人发展的感觉。焦虑、时间要求和潜在的接触触发内容都可能成为障碍。然而,结构化的任务、与研究人员的积极关系以及灵活的参与有助于减轻这些挑战。结论:研究结果强调了未来让年轻人参与资源开发研究项目的伦理考虑和潜在策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信