A T Galazov, A Yu Drobyshev, N A Redko, T M Dibirov, V M Mikhailyukov, A A Miterev
{"title":"[The significance of using the method of shared decision-making in preparing patients for orthognathic surgery].","authors":"A T Galazov, A Yu Drobyshev, N A Redko, T M Dibirov, V M Mikhailyukov, A A Miterev","doi":"10.17116/stomat202510404126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluation of the effectiveness and impact of the shared decision-making method on patient satisfaction with the quality of preoperative preparation for combined (orthodontic and surgical) treatment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 97 patients with skeletal forms of distal and mesial occlusion, who were prepared for combined (orthodontic and surgical) treatment using the shared decision-making method. The effectiveness of the shared decision-making technique used in preparing patients for combined treatment was assessed by means of a questionnaire developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the 2nd day after surgery, a patient survey revealed 25 different complaints related to the clinical manifestations of the effects of orthognathic surgery and rehabilitation features. The most frequently reported complaints were difficulty breathing (60.8%), swelling in the face (38.1%), difficulty eating (37.1%), bimaxillary splinting (21.7%), weakness/drowsiness (20.6%), numbness (19.6%), facial pain (15.5%). A survey conducted 6 months after orthognathic surgery showed that only 5.2% of patients were not satisfied with their preoperative consultation and considered the information provided to them about the postoperative consequences and rehabilitation features insufficiently comprehensive. 91.8% of patients noted that the information provided at the preoperative consultation stage helped them adapt to the specifics of the rehabilitation period, and only 1% would like to be unaware of the postoperative consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of the shared decision-making method allows patients to successfully adapt to the consequences of orthognathic surgery and to the specifics of rehabilitation after it.</p>","PeriodicalId":35887,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologiya","volume":"104 4","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202510404126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Evaluation of the effectiveness and impact of the shared decision-making method on patient satisfaction with the quality of preoperative preparation for combined (orthodontic and surgical) treatment.
Material and methods: The study included 97 patients with skeletal forms of distal and mesial occlusion, who were prepared for combined (orthodontic and surgical) treatment using the shared decision-making method. The effectiveness of the shared decision-making technique used in preparing patients for combined treatment was assessed by means of a questionnaire developed.
Results: On the 2nd day after surgery, a patient survey revealed 25 different complaints related to the clinical manifestations of the effects of orthognathic surgery and rehabilitation features. The most frequently reported complaints were difficulty breathing (60.8%), swelling in the face (38.1%), difficulty eating (37.1%), bimaxillary splinting (21.7%), weakness/drowsiness (20.6%), numbness (19.6%), facial pain (15.5%). A survey conducted 6 months after orthognathic surgery showed that only 5.2% of patients were not satisfied with their preoperative consultation and considered the information provided to them about the postoperative consequences and rehabilitation features insufficiently comprehensive. 91.8% of patients noted that the information provided at the preoperative consultation stage helped them adapt to the specifics of the rehabilitation period, and only 1% would like to be unaware of the postoperative consequences.
Conclusion: The use of the shared decision-making method allows patients to successfully adapt to the consequences of orthognathic surgery and to the specifics of rehabilitation after it.