[The significance of using the method of shared decision-making in preparing patients for orthognathic surgery].

Q4 Medicine
A T Galazov, A Yu Drobyshev, N A Redko, T M Dibirov, V M Mikhailyukov, A A Miterev
{"title":"[The significance of using the method of shared decision-making in preparing patients for orthognathic surgery].","authors":"A T Galazov, A Yu Drobyshev, N A Redko, T M Dibirov, V M Mikhailyukov, A A Miterev","doi":"10.17116/stomat202510404126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluation of the effectiveness and impact of the shared decision-making method on patient satisfaction with the quality of preoperative preparation for combined (orthodontic and surgical) treatment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 97 patients with skeletal forms of distal and mesial occlusion, who were prepared for combined (orthodontic and surgical) treatment using the shared decision-making method. The effectiveness of the shared decision-making technique used in preparing patients for combined treatment was assessed by means of a questionnaire developed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the 2nd day after surgery, a patient survey revealed 25 different complaints related to the clinical manifestations of the effects of orthognathic surgery and rehabilitation features. The most frequently reported complaints were difficulty breathing (60.8%), swelling in the face (38.1%), difficulty eating (37.1%), bimaxillary splinting (21.7%), weakness/drowsiness (20.6%), numbness (19.6%), facial pain (15.5%). A survey conducted 6 months after orthognathic surgery showed that only 5.2% of patients were not satisfied with their preoperative consultation and considered the information provided to them about the postoperative consequences and rehabilitation features insufficiently comprehensive. 91.8% of patients noted that the information provided at the preoperative consultation stage helped them adapt to the specifics of the rehabilitation period, and only 1% would like to be unaware of the postoperative consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of the shared decision-making method allows patients to successfully adapt to the consequences of orthognathic surgery and to the specifics of rehabilitation after it.</p>","PeriodicalId":35887,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologiya","volume":"104 4","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat202510404126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of the effectiveness and impact of the shared decision-making method on patient satisfaction with the quality of preoperative preparation for combined (orthodontic and surgical) treatment.

Material and methods: The study included 97 patients with skeletal forms of distal and mesial occlusion, who were prepared for combined (orthodontic and surgical) treatment using the shared decision-making method. The effectiveness of the shared decision-making technique used in preparing patients for combined treatment was assessed by means of a questionnaire developed.

Results: On the 2nd day after surgery, a patient survey revealed 25 different complaints related to the clinical manifestations of the effects of orthognathic surgery and rehabilitation features. The most frequently reported complaints were difficulty breathing (60.8%), swelling in the face (38.1%), difficulty eating (37.1%), bimaxillary splinting (21.7%), weakness/drowsiness (20.6%), numbness (19.6%), facial pain (15.5%). A survey conducted 6 months after orthognathic surgery showed that only 5.2% of patients were not satisfied with their preoperative consultation and considered the information provided to them about the postoperative consequences and rehabilitation features insufficiently comprehensive. 91.8% of patients noted that the information provided at the preoperative consultation stage helped them adapt to the specifics of the rehabilitation period, and only 1% would like to be unaware of the postoperative consequences.

Conclusion: The use of the shared decision-making method allows patients to successfully adapt to the consequences of orthognathic surgery and to the specifics of rehabilitation after it.

[采用共同决策方法在患者正颌手术准备中的意义]。
目的:评价共同决策方法对正畸手术联合治疗术前准备质量满意度的影响及有效性。材料和方法:本研究纳入97例骨性中、远端咬合患者,准备采用共享决策方法进行正畸和手术联合治疗。在准备联合治疗的患者中使用的共享决策技术的有效性通过开发问卷的方式进行评估。结果:术后第2天对患者进行调查,发现25例不同的主诉与正颌手术效果的临床表现及康复特点有关。最常见的主诉是呼吸困难(60.8%)、面部肿胀(38.1%)、进食困难(37.1%)、双颌夹板(21.7%)、虚弱/嗜睡(20.6%)、麻木(19.6%)、面部疼痛(15.5%)。一项正颌手术后6个月的调查显示,只有5.2%的患者对术前咨询不满意,认为提供给他们的关于术后后果和康复特征的信息不够全面。91.8%的患者表示术前咨询阶段提供的信息有助于他们适应康复期的具体情况,只有1%的患者不希望知道术后的后果。结论:共享决策方法的使用使患者能够成功地适应正颌手术的后果和术后康复的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stomatologiya
Stomatologiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信