[Bayesian Regression Modeling of the Correlation between Post-Progression Survival and Overall Survival in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy].

Q4 Medicine
Motoko Kaneko, Toshihiro Shida, Yoshiki Abe, Jiro Ogura, Tadao Inoue, Hiroaki Yamaguchi
{"title":"[Bayesian Regression Modeling of the Correlation between Post-Progression Survival and Overall Survival in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy].","authors":"Motoko Kaneko, Toshihiro Shida, Yoshiki Abe, Jiro Ogura, Tadao Inoue, Hiroaki Yamaguchi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)are key indicators commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for advanced or recurrent cancer. However, in immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)therapy, improvements in PFS do not always correlate directly with extended OS. This study analyzed PFS, OS, and post-progression survival(PPS)using Bayesian statistics in cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab. The findings indicate that PPS extension significantly contributed to prolonged OS for both drugs. Notably, in the pembrolizumab group, PPS demonstrated high predictive accuracy for OS, highlighting its potential as a stable metric. Additionally, ICI-associated delayed responses and pseudoprogression can affect PFS assessment, underscoring the importance of PPS evaluation in capturing the prolonged effects of ICI therapy. Future studies should further explore these relationships, potentially incorporating nonlinear models to enhance predictive accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35588,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","volume":"52 7","pages":"523-527"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)are key indicators commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for advanced or recurrent cancer. However, in immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)therapy, improvements in PFS do not always correlate directly with extended OS. This study analyzed PFS, OS, and post-progression survival(PPS)using Bayesian statistics in cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab. The findings indicate that PPS extension significantly contributed to prolonged OS for both drugs. Notably, in the pembrolizumab group, PPS demonstrated high predictive accuracy for OS, highlighting its potential as a stable metric. Additionally, ICI-associated delayed responses and pseudoprogression can affect PFS assessment, underscoring the importance of PPS evaluation in capturing the prolonged effects of ICI therapy. Future studies should further explore these relationships, potentially incorporating nonlinear models to enhance predictive accuracy.

[免疫检查点抑制剂治疗进展后生存期与总生存期相关性的贝叶斯回归模型]。
无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)是评估晚期或复发癌症治疗有效性的关键指标。然而,在免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗中,PFS的改善并不总是与延长的OS直接相关。该研究使用贝叶斯统计分析了使用阿特唑单抗和派姆单抗治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的PFS、OS和进展后生存期(PPS)。研究结果表明,PPS延长显著有助于延长两种药物的生存期。值得注意的是,在派姆单抗组中,PPS对OS的预测准确性很高,突出了其作为稳定指标的潜力。此外,ICI相关的延迟反应和假性进展会影响PFS的评估,强调了PPS评估在捕捉ICI治疗的长期效果方面的重要性。未来的研究应该进一步探索这些关系,可能会结合非线性模型来提高预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
337
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信