Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty Versus Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty: A Single Centre Experience.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler, Birte Bender, Roland Hartl, Verena Strasser, Daniel Sontheimer, Sladjana Buricic, Barbara Kofler, Birgit Högl, Herbert Riechelmann, Benedikt Hofauer
{"title":"Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty Versus Expansion Sphincter Pharyngoplasty: A Single Centre Experience.","authors":"Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler, Birte Bender, Roland Hartl, Verena Strasser, Daniel Sontheimer, Sladjana Buricic, Barbara Kofler, Birgit Högl, Herbert Riechelmann, Benedikt Hofauer","doi":"10.3390/clockssleep7030038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) are two standard surgical procedures for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. In a retrospective clinical trial, we compared the two surgical techniques regarding objective sleep parameters and patients' reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients treated with UPPP or ESP between January 2016 and February 2020 were included in this retrospective clinical trial. Pre- and postoperative AHI, BMI, and smoking habits were recorded. Subjective improvement was assessed by the ESS score and symptom relief reported by patients and their bed partners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2016 and 2020, 114 patients were included in the study, 74 patients suffered from OSA, and 30 patients had non-apnoeic snoring (AHI < 5/h). No preoperative sleeping studies were available in 10 patients (10/114; 9%). Based on the findings during drug-induced sedation endoscopy, most patients received an ESP (71/114, 62%), and 43 patients received a UPPP (43/114, 38%). Additionally, in 52/114 (46%), radio frequency ablation of the tongue base was performed if DISE revealed retrolingual collapse. ESP reduced AHI from 21.1 ± 10.8/h to 13.3 ± 12.1/h (<i>p</i> = 0.04), whereas UPPP caused a non-significant decrease in the AHI from 25.0 ± 13.8/h to 18.2 ± 14.6/h (<i>p</i> = 0.6). A minor secondary bleeding was observed in 32 patients, which was effectively treated with electrocautery or conservative therapy (32/114). This was more common in the ESP group (22/71; 31%) than in the UPPP group (10/43; 23%). Postoperative need for analgesics was higher in the ESP group than in the UPPP group. The ESS score showed no significant improvement after UPPP or ESP (<i>p</i> = 0.3), but subjective improvement in snoring was reported by 87/114 (76%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AHI reduction was significantly higher in the ESP patient group than in the UPPP group. ESP patients had a slightly higher rate of minor secondary bleeding and postoperative need for analgesics than UPPP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":33568,"journal":{"name":"Clocks & Sleep","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clocks & Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep7030038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (ESP) are two standard surgical procedures for the treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. In a retrospective clinical trial, we compared the two surgical techniques regarding objective sleep parameters and patients' reported outcomes.

Materials and methods: Patients treated with UPPP or ESP between January 2016 and February 2020 were included in this retrospective clinical trial. Pre- and postoperative AHI, BMI, and smoking habits were recorded. Subjective improvement was assessed by the ESS score and symptom relief reported by patients and their bed partners.

Results: Between 2016 and 2020, 114 patients were included in the study, 74 patients suffered from OSA, and 30 patients had non-apnoeic snoring (AHI < 5/h). No preoperative sleeping studies were available in 10 patients (10/114; 9%). Based on the findings during drug-induced sedation endoscopy, most patients received an ESP (71/114, 62%), and 43 patients received a UPPP (43/114, 38%). Additionally, in 52/114 (46%), radio frequency ablation of the tongue base was performed if DISE revealed retrolingual collapse. ESP reduced AHI from 21.1 ± 10.8/h to 13.3 ± 12.1/h (p = 0.04), whereas UPPP caused a non-significant decrease in the AHI from 25.0 ± 13.8/h to 18.2 ± 14.6/h (p = 0.6). A minor secondary bleeding was observed in 32 patients, which was effectively treated with electrocautery or conservative therapy (32/114). This was more common in the ESP group (22/71; 31%) than in the UPPP group (10/43; 23%). Postoperative need for analgesics was higher in the ESP group than in the UPPP group. The ESS score showed no significant improvement after UPPP or ESP (p = 0.3), but subjective improvement in snoring was reported by 87/114 (76%) patients.

Conclusion: AHI reduction was significantly higher in the ESP patient group than in the UPPP group. ESP patients had a slightly higher rate of minor secondary bleeding and postoperative need for analgesics than UPPP patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

悬垂腭咽成形术与扩张括约肌咽成形术:单中心经验。
背景:悬垂腭咽成形术和扩张括约肌咽成形术是治疗打鼾和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的两种标准手术方法。在一项回顾性临床试验中,我们比较了两种手术技术的客观睡眠参数和患者报告的结果。材料和方法:2016年1月至2020年2月期间接受UPPP或ESP治疗的患者纳入本回顾性临床试验。记录术前和术后AHI、BMI和吸烟习惯。主观改善通过ESS评分和患者及其床伴报告的症状缓解来评估。结果:2016 - 2020年共纳入114例患者,其中74例为OSA, 30例为非呼吸暂停性打鼾(AHI < 5/h)。10例患者术前无睡眠研究(10/114;9%)。根据药物镇静内镜检查结果,大多数患者接受了ESP(71/114, 62%), 43例患者接受了UPPP(43/114, 38%)。此外,在52/114(46%)中,如果DISE显示舌后塌陷,则对舌基进行射频消融。ESP将AHI从21.1±10.8/h降至13.3±12.1/h (p = 0.04),而UPPP将AHI从25.0±13.8/h降至18.2±14.6/h (p = 0.6)。32例患者出现轻微继发性出血,经电灼或保守治疗有效(32/114)。ESP组(22/71,31%)比UPPP组(10/43,23%)更常见。ESP组术后对镇痛药的需求高于UPPP组。UPPP或ESP后ESS评分无显著改善(p = 0.3),但114例患者中有87例(76%)报告打鼾的主观改善。结论:ESP组患者AHI降低明显高于UPPP组。ESP患者的次要继发性出血率和术后对镇痛药的需求略高于UPPP患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clocks & Sleep
Clocks & Sleep Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信