Who Benefits the Most from Sleep Hygiene Education? Findings from the SLeep Education for Everyone Program (SLEEP).

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alyssa Tisdale, Nahyun Kim, Dawn A Contreras, Elizabeth Williams, Robin M Tucker
{"title":"Who Benefits the Most from Sleep Hygiene Education? Findings from the SLeep Education for Everyone Program (SLEEP).","authors":"Alyssa Tisdale, Nahyun Kim, Dawn A Contreras, Elizabeth Williams, Robin M Tucker","doi":"10.3390/clockssleep7030040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined data from participants who completed the SLeep Education for Everyone Program (SLEEP) to explore how various demographic variables affected sleep outcomes and to determine which participant characteristics predicted success. A total of 104 individuals participated. The Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI) measured undesirable sleep behaviors; the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) assessed sleep quality and self-reported sleep duration. Participant demographic information was collected at baseline. A mixed ANOVA evaluated group differences, and a multiple linear regression model identified predictors of sleep improvements. Change in SHI scores from pre- to post-intervention demonstrated a significant time × group interaction between Black and white participants (<i>p</i> = 0.024); further analysis indicated Black participants improved more. Better baseline scores predicted more favorable post-intervention outcomes for SHI, PSQI, and sleep duration. Fewer chronic conditions predicted better post-intervention SHI and PSQI scores. Older age also predicted better SHI scores. More favorable initial scores, fewer chronic conditions, and older age were the strongest predictors of positive outcomes following SLEEP. Improved sleep hygiene, sleep quality, and sleep duration were observed over time within subjects across all groups. In summary, SLEEP appears to be effective. Further work exploring challenges experienced by younger participants or those with multiple co-morbidities is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":33568,"journal":{"name":"Clocks & Sleep","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12372062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clocks & Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep7030040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined data from participants who completed the SLeep Education for Everyone Program (SLEEP) to explore how various demographic variables affected sleep outcomes and to determine which participant characteristics predicted success. A total of 104 individuals participated. The Sleep Hygiene Index (SHI) measured undesirable sleep behaviors; the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) assessed sleep quality and self-reported sleep duration. Participant demographic information was collected at baseline. A mixed ANOVA evaluated group differences, and a multiple linear regression model identified predictors of sleep improvements. Change in SHI scores from pre- to post-intervention demonstrated a significant time × group interaction between Black and white participants (p = 0.024); further analysis indicated Black participants improved more. Better baseline scores predicted more favorable post-intervention outcomes for SHI, PSQI, and sleep duration. Fewer chronic conditions predicted better post-intervention SHI and PSQI scores. Older age also predicted better SHI scores. More favorable initial scores, fewer chronic conditions, and older age were the strongest predictors of positive outcomes following SLEEP. Improved sleep hygiene, sleep quality, and sleep duration were observed over time within subjects across all groups. In summary, SLEEP appears to be effective. Further work exploring challenges experienced by younger participants or those with multiple co-morbidities is warranted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

谁从睡眠卫生教育中获益最多?睡眠教育项目(SLeep)的研究结果。
这项研究检查了完成“全民睡眠教育计划”(SLeep)的参与者的数据,以探索各种人口统计学变量如何影响睡眠结果,并确定哪些参与者的特征可以预测成功。共有104人参与。睡眠卫生指数(SHI)衡量不良睡眠行为;匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估睡眠质量和自我报告的睡眠时间。在基线时收集参与者的人口统计信息。混合方差分析评估各组差异,多元线性回归模型确定睡眠改善的预测因子。从干预前到干预后,SHI评分的变化表明黑人和白人参与者之间存在显著的时间×组交互作用(p = 0.024);进一步的分析表明黑人参与者进步更多。较好的基线评分预示着SHI、PSQI和睡眠时间的干预后结果更有利。较少的慢性疾病预示着干预后SHI和PSQI得分较高。年龄越大,SHI分数也越高。更有利的初始得分、更少的慢性疾病和更大的年龄是睡眠后积极结果的最强预测因子。随着时间的推移,所有研究对象的睡眠卫生、睡眠质量和睡眠时间都得到了改善。总之,睡眠似乎是有效的。进一步探索年轻参与者或患有多种合并症的参与者所面临的挑战是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clocks & Sleep
Clocks & Sleep Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信