In-hospital Utilization and Dose Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies among Acute Heart Failure Yemeni Patients.

IF 0.5 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart Views Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-16 DOI:10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_152_24
Adnan Al-Radhi, Abdulkafi Shujaa, Nora Alsagheer, Taha Al-Maimoony, Ahmed Al-Motarreb
{"title":"In-hospital Utilization and Dose Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapies among Acute Heart Failure Yemeni Patients.","authors":"Adnan Al-Radhi, Abdulkafi Shujaa, Nora Alsagheer, Taha Al-Maimoony, Ahmed Al-Motarreb","doi":"10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_152_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite robust evidence and strong recommendations supporting the incremental and dose-related benefit of combined neurohormonal blockers (guideline-directed medical therapy [GDMT]) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), real-world data shows significant gaps in uses and/or dosing of these therapies.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>As heart failure (HF) hospitalization is viewed as an opportunity for the initiation and optimization of HF life-saving medications and the paucity of data exploring this important issue in Yemen, the current study aims to fill this gap.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the use, number, and dose optimization of the GDMT in a cohort of hospitalized patients with HFrEF in Yemen.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 1408 Yemeni patients with available ejection fraction (EF) enrolled in the Gulf CARE registry from February to November 2012. In this analysis, we included only four classes of GDMT, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), evidence-based beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Each drug dose was converted to the equivalent daily dose of a selected representative drug. We explored the prescription of these drugs either separately or in combination and the target dose (TD) achievement for each drug at admission and discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the1408 patients recruited, 916 patients (65%) were males and mean age was 53.5 ± 15.4 years, 53% (n = 748) presented with HFrEF (EF < 40%), 21% (n = 299) with HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%), and 26% (n = 361) with HFmrEF (Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction) (EF 40-49%). Beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and MRA were prescribed to 28% (<i>n</i> = 400), 51% (<i>n</i> = 716), and 10% (<i>n</i> = 143) at baseline and 69.5% (<i>n</i> = 978), 82% (<i>n</i> = 1157), and 59% (<i>n</i> = 831) on discharge, respectively. The rate of TD achievement was (0.0% vs. 3.6% (<i>n</i> = 35]) for beta-blockers and (0.279% [<i>n</i> = 2] vs. 1.5% [<i>n</i> = 17]) for renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on baseline and discharge, respectively. Among 748 patients with HFrEF, 36% (<i>n</i> = 270) were not receiving any GDMT at baseline, while triple therapy was prescribed to 10% (<i>n</i> = 74) at baseline and 61.5% (<i>n</i> = 460) on discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A substantial gap in GDMT implementations with both underutilization and low TD achievement in patients with HFrEF in Yemen.</p>","PeriodicalId":32654,"journal":{"name":"Heart Views","volume":"26 1","pages":"7-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12370099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Views","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_152_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite robust evidence and strong recommendations supporting the incremental and dose-related benefit of combined neurohormonal blockers (guideline-directed medical therapy [GDMT]) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), real-world data shows significant gaps in uses and/or dosing of these therapies.

Rationale: As heart failure (HF) hospitalization is viewed as an opportunity for the initiation and optimization of HF life-saving medications and the paucity of data exploring this important issue in Yemen, the current study aims to fill this gap.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the use, number, and dose optimization of the GDMT in a cohort of hospitalized patients with HFrEF in Yemen.

Materials and methods: We included 1408 Yemeni patients with available ejection fraction (EF) enrolled in the Gulf CARE registry from February to November 2012. In this analysis, we included only four classes of GDMT, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi), evidence-based beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Each drug dose was converted to the equivalent daily dose of a selected representative drug. We explored the prescription of these drugs either separately or in combination and the target dose (TD) achievement for each drug at admission and discharge.

Results: Among the1408 patients recruited, 916 patients (65%) were males and mean age was 53.5 ± 15.4 years, 53% (n = 748) presented with HFrEF (EF < 40%), 21% (n = 299) with HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%), and 26% (n = 361) with HFmrEF (Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction) (EF 40-49%). Beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, and MRA were prescribed to 28% (n = 400), 51% (n = 716), and 10% (n = 143) at baseline and 69.5% (n = 978), 82% (n = 1157), and 59% (n = 831) on discharge, respectively. The rate of TD achievement was (0.0% vs. 3.6% (n = 35]) for beta-blockers and (0.279% [n = 2] vs. 1.5% [n = 17]) for renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on baseline and discharge, respectively. Among 748 patients with HFrEF, 36% (n = 270) were not receiving any GDMT at baseline, while triple therapy was prescribed to 10% (n = 74) at baseline and 61.5% (n = 460) on discharge.

Conclusions: A substantial gap in GDMT implementations with both underutilization and low TD achievement in patients with HFrEF in Yemen.

Abstract Image

也门急性心力衰竭患者的住院利用和剂量优化
背景:尽管有强有力的证据和强烈的建议支持联合神经激素阻滞剂(指南导向药物治疗[GDMT])治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)的增量和剂量相关益处,但实际数据显示这些疗法的使用和/或剂量存在显着差距。理由:心力衰竭住院治疗被视为启动和优化心力衰竭救命药物的机会,而也门探索这一重要问题的数据缺乏,因此本研究旨在填补这一空白。目的:本研究的目的是评估GDMT在也门HFrEF住院患者队列中的使用、数量和剂量优化。材料和方法:我们纳入了2012年2月至11月在Gulf CARE注册中心登记的1408名可用射血分数(EF)的也门患者。在本分析中,我们只纳入了四类GDMT,肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi),循证β受体阻滞剂和矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)。每个药物剂量被转换成一种选定的代表性药物的当量日剂量。我们探讨了这些药物单独或联合使用的处方,以及每种药物在入院和出院时的靶剂量(TD)达到情况。结果:在1408例患者中,916例(65%)为男性,平均年龄为53.5±15.4岁,53% (n = 748)为HFrEF (EF < 40%), 21% (n = 299)为HFpEF (EF≥50%),26% (n = 361)为HFmrEF(心力衰竭伴射血分数轻度降低)(EF 40-49%)。-受体阻滞剂、肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂和MRA在基线时分别为28% (n = 400)、51% (n = 716)和10% (n = 143),出院时分别为69.5% (n = 978)、82% (n = 1157)和59% (n = 831)。在基线和出院时,β -受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂的TD达到率分别为0.0%和3.6% (n = 35)和0.279% (n = 2)和1.5% (n = 17)。在748例HFrEF患者中,36% (n = 270)在基线时未接受任何GDMT,而在基线时接受三联治疗的患者占10% (n = 74),出院时占61.5% (n = 460)。结论:在也门HFrEF患者中,GDMT的实施存在巨大差距,利用率不足,TD成功率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Views
Heart Views CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书