Reflecting on Uncertainty Tolerance in Student Pharmacists Following an Inpatient Rounding Simulation: A Pilot Mixed-Methods Study.

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-08-20 DOI:10.3390/pharmacy13040111
Nicole E Cieri-Hutcherson, Collin M Clark
{"title":"Reflecting on Uncertainty Tolerance in Student Pharmacists Following an Inpatient Rounding Simulation: A Pilot Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Nicole E Cieri-Hutcherson, Collin M Clark","doi":"10.3390/pharmacy13040111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With increasing involvement of pharmacists in clinical situations and expanding scope of practice, the expectation and management of uncertainty is a desirable component of pharmacy education, leading to improved uncertainty tolerance (UT) as pharmacists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether an inpatient rounding simulation (IRS) that exposes student pharmacists to a level of uncertainty leads to changes in tolerance of ambiguity scale (TAS) scores and self-reflection comments. A pre-/post-observational, pilot survey study was conducted, including student pharmacists in their second professional year at the United States School of Pharmacy who were enrolled in an associated lab-based course in Spring 2024. Student teams completed a mock IRS and responded to clinical questions in a timed environment. Students completed pre-/post-simulation TAS and self-reflection on uncertainty/UT within the simulation. Pre-/post-simulation TAS scores were analyzed with a paired <i>t</i>-test. Qualitative analysis was used to identify themes in self-reflection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>59 students responded (48% response rate). TAS was not different pre-/post-IRS (63.2 vs. 62.6, <i>p</i> = 0.63). When individual subscales were compared, a statistically significant difference was found in the insolubility subscale (10.5 vs. 9.5; <i>p</i> = 0.02). Themes of uncertainty that emerged during qualitative analysis of pre-simulation included the clinical question posed to the team. Student pharmacists overcame uncertainty pre-simulation by working with their team and relying on the availability of resources. Themes of uncertainty emerging during qualitative analysis of post-simulation included discerning the best answer. Student pharmacists overcame uncertainty post-simulation by working with their team and cited working with their team as a positive aspect of the IRS experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this pilot study, student pharmacists had high TAS scores both pre- and post-simulation. Students utilized their teams and cited this as a positive in an uncertain environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":30544,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12389111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy13040111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With increasing involvement of pharmacists in clinical situations and expanding scope of practice, the expectation and management of uncertainty is a desirable component of pharmacy education, leading to improved uncertainty tolerance (UT) as pharmacists.

Methods: The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether an inpatient rounding simulation (IRS) that exposes student pharmacists to a level of uncertainty leads to changes in tolerance of ambiguity scale (TAS) scores and self-reflection comments. A pre-/post-observational, pilot survey study was conducted, including student pharmacists in their second professional year at the United States School of Pharmacy who were enrolled in an associated lab-based course in Spring 2024. Student teams completed a mock IRS and responded to clinical questions in a timed environment. Students completed pre-/post-simulation TAS and self-reflection on uncertainty/UT within the simulation. Pre-/post-simulation TAS scores were analyzed with a paired t-test. Qualitative analysis was used to identify themes in self-reflection.

Results: 59 students responded (48% response rate). TAS was not different pre-/post-IRS (63.2 vs. 62.6, p = 0.63). When individual subscales were compared, a statistically significant difference was found in the insolubility subscale (10.5 vs. 9.5; p = 0.02). Themes of uncertainty that emerged during qualitative analysis of pre-simulation included the clinical question posed to the team. Student pharmacists overcame uncertainty pre-simulation by working with their team and relying on the availability of resources. Themes of uncertainty emerging during qualitative analysis of post-simulation included discerning the best answer. Student pharmacists overcame uncertainty post-simulation by working with their team and cited working with their team as a positive aspect of the IRS experience.

Conclusions: In this pilot study, student pharmacists had high TAS scores both pre- and post-simulation. Students utilized their teams and cited this as a positive in an uncertain environment.

反思学生药剂师在住院病人舍入模拟后的不确定性容忍:一项试点混合方法研究。
背景:随着药剂师越来越多地参与临床情况和扩大实践范围,对不确定性的预期和管理是药学教育的一个理想组成部分,从而提高药剂师的不确定性容忍(UT)。方法:本初步研究的目的是确定将学生药师暴露于一定程度的不确定性的住院病人围访模拟(IRS)是否会导致模糊度耐受性量表(TAS)得分和自我反思评价的变化。进行了一项前期/后期观察性试点调查研究,研究对象包括2024年春季在美国药学院就读二年级的学生药剂师,他们参加了相关的实验室课程。学生团队完成了模拟IRS,并在定时环境中回答临床问题。学生在模拟中完成了模拟前/模拟后的TAS和对不确定性/UT的自我反思。模拟前/模拟后的TAS评分采用配对t检验进行分析。定性分析用于确定自我反思的主题。结果:59名学生回复,回复率48%。TAS在irs前和irs后没有差异(63.2 vs. 62.6, p = 0.63)。当比较单个分量表时,发现不溶性分量表的差异有统计学意义(10.5比9.5;p = 0.02)。在预模拟定性分析期间出现的不确定性主题包括向团队提出的临床问题。学生药剂师克服了不确定性预模拟与他们的团队合作,并依靠资源的可用性。在模拟后的定性分析中出现的不确定性主题包括识别最佳答案。学生药剂师通过与他们的团队合作克服了模拟后的不确定性,并将与他们的团队合作作为IRS经验的积极方面。结论:在这项初步研究中,学生药师在模拟前和模拟后的TAS得分都很高。学生们利用他们的团队,并认为这是一个不确定环境中的积极因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy
Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
9.10%
发文量
141
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信