[A survey of awareness of guidelines and consensus and an analysis of the effectiveness of methodology training among medical staff in otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery].

Q4 Medicine
H Liu, Y Y Yao, Z J Wang, Q L Shi, Y S Qin, H H Lai, L Ge, Y L Chen
{"title":"[A survey of awareness of guidelines and consensus and an analysis of the effectiveness of methodology training among medical staff in otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery].","authors":"H Liu, Y Y Yao, Z J Wang, Q L Shi, Y S Qin, H H Lai, L Ge, Y L Chen","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn1115330-20250419-00238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the awareness of clinical practice guidelines (referred to as \"guidelines\") and experts consensus (referred to as \"consensus\") among otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff, and to analyze the effectiveness of the ninth guideline methodology workshop. <b>Methods:</b> Self-designed survey questionnaires were used to conduct two surveys among otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff who participated in the ninth guideline methodology workshop held in Chengdu from Jannuary 10 to 11, 2025, both before and after the training, to assess their awareness and knowledge of guideline and consensus development methodology. The effectiveness of the training was evaluated using the paired chi-square test. <b>Results:</b> A total of 77 peoples (95.06%), who participated in the ninth guideline methodology workshop, completed the survey questionnaires both before and after the training. One-third of the respondents reported a relatively good to very good understanding of guideline and consensus development. The overall methodology of the guidelines and consensus they had participated in developing still showed room for improvement. After the methodology training, the score rate for each test question significantly increased compared to before the training (<i>P<</i>0.05), and the distribution trend of the total scores changed markedly (Before the training, 71 people scored less than 60 points, 4 people scored 60 points, and 2 people scored 70 points. After the training, only 1 person scored less than 60 points, 1 person scored 60 points, and 75 people scored between 70 and 100 points, of which 21 people scored 100 points). <b>Conclusion:</b> The awareness of guideline and consensus development methodology among otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff still has room for improvement. The guideline methodology workshop can enhance participants' mastery of guideline and consensus development methodology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 7","pages":"824-830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn1115330-20250419-00238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the awareness of clinical practice guidelines (referred to as "guidelines") and experts consensus (referred to as "consensus") among otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff, and to analyze the effectiveness of the ninth guideline methodology workshop. Methods: Self-designed survey questionnaires were used to conduct two surveys among otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff who participated in the ninth guideline methodology workshop held in Chengdu from Jannuary 10 to 11, 2025, both before and after the training, to assess their awareness and knowledge of guideline and consensus development methodology. The effectiveness of the training was evaluated using the paired chi-square test. Results: A total of 77 peoples (95.06%), who participated in the ninth guideline methodology workshop, completed the survey questionnaires both before and after the training. One-third of the respondents reported a relatively good to very good understanding of guideline and consensus development. The overall methodology of the guidelines and consensus they had participated in developing still showed room for improvement. After the methodology training, the score rate for each test question significantly increased compared to before the training (P<0.05), and the distribution trend of the total scores changed markedly (Before the training, 71 people scored less than 60 points, 4 people scored 60 points, and 2 people scored 70 points. After the training, only 1 person scored less than 60 points, 1 person scored 60 points, and 75 people scored between 70 and 100 points, of which 21 people scored 100 points). Conclusion: The awareness of guideline and consensus development methodology among otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery medical staff still has room for improvement. The guideline methodology workshop can enhance participants' mastery of guideline and consensus development methodology.

[耳鼻喉科头颈外科医务人员指南和共识意识调查及方法学培训有效性分析]。
目的:了解耳鼻喉头颈外科医护人员对临床实践指南(以下简称“指南”)和专家共识(以下简称“共识”)的认知情况,并分析第九届指南方法学研讨会的效果。方法:采用自行设计的调查问卷,对参加2025年1月10日至11日在成都举行的第九届指南方法学研讨会的耳鼻喉头颈外科医护人员在培训前后进行两次调查,评估其对指南和共识制定方法学的认知和知识。使用配对卡方检验评估训练的有效性。结果:参加第九届指南方法学研讨班的77人(95.06%)在培训前后完成了问卷调查。三分之一的回答者报告了对指南和共识发展的相对良好到非常好的理解。它们参与制定的准则和协商一致意见的通盘方法仍有改进的余地。经过方法学培训后,各题得分率较培训前显著提高(P0.05),总分分布趋势发生显著变化(培训前得分低于60分的有71人,60分的有4人,70分的有2人)。训练结束后,只有1人得分低于60分,1人得分为60分,75人得分在70 - 100分之间,其中21人得分为100分)。结论:耳鼻喉头颈外科医护人员对指南和共识制定方法的认识仍有待提高。指南方法学研讨会可以提高参与者对指南和共识发展方法学的掌握程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信