Renal arterial pseudoaneurysm after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single-center analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yu-Pin Huang, Hsiao-Jen Chung, I-Shen Huang, Tzu-Ping Lin, Shing-Hwa Lu, Eric Y H Huang
{"title":"Renal arterial pseudoaneurysm after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single-center analysis.","authors":"Yu-Pin Huang, Hsiao-Jen Chung, I-Shen Huang, Tzu-Ping Lin, Shing-Hwa Lu, Eric Y H Huang","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05851-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the incidence of renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RaPN), identify predictive factors, and evaluate endovascular management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The institutional RaPN database was retrospectively reviewed, and data from December 2009 to June 2021 were used. Computed tomography angiography was used to diagnose RAP. Patients who underwent embolization for RAP after RaPN were compared with those without RAP or with RAP managed conservatively. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and operative outcomes were evaluated, and the predictive factors for RAP after RaPN were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 544 patients who underwent RaPN, 14 developed RAP after surgery, of which 12 underwent embolization. Most patients experienced gross hematuria and were diagnosed using computed tomography angiography. No patient exhibited recurrent RAP during follow-up. The following was found for patients who underwent embolization for RAP: a higher proportion of men (91.7% vs. 59.4%, p = 0.024), higher RENAL nephrometry scores (median: 9.0 vs. 8.0, p = 0.02), longer operative times (mean: 349.6 vs. 283.7 min, p = 0.046), and longer postoperative hospital stays (median: 6.0 vs. 5.0 days, p = 0.031). The N score in the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher in the embolization group (p = 0.031) than in the nonembolization group. Univariate analysis revealed that RENAL nephrometry scores and total operative time were significant predictors of RAP occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The occurrence of RAP was associated with higher RENAL nephrometry scores and longer operative times.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05851-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the incidence of renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP) after robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RaPN), identify predictive factors, and evaluate endovascular management.

Methods: The institutional RaPN database was retrospectively reviewed, and data from December 2009 to June 2021 were used. Computed tomography angiography was used to diagnose RAP. Patients who underwent embolization for RAP after RaPN were compared with those without RAP or with RAP managed conservatively. Data on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and operative outcomes were evaluated, and the predictive factors for RAP after RaPN were determined.

Results: Of the 544 patients who underwent RaPN, 14 developed RAP after surgery, of which 12 underwent embolization. Most patients experienced gross hematuria and were diagnosed using computed tomography angiography. No patient exhibited recurrent RAP during follow-up. The following was found for patients who underwent embolization for RAP: a higher proportion of men (91.7% vs. 59.4%, p = 0.024), higher RENAL nephrometry scores (median: 9.0 vs. 8.0, p = 0.02), longer operative times (mean: 349.6 vs. 283.7 min, p = 0.046), and longer postoperative hospital stays (median: 6.0 vs. 5.0 days, p = 0.031). The N score in the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher in the embolization group (p = 0.031) than in the nonembolization group. Univariate analysis revealed that RENAL nephrometry scores and total operative time were significant predictors of RAP occurrence.

Conclusion: The occurrence of RAP was associated with higher RENAL nephrometry scores and longer operative times.

机器人辅助部分肾切除术后肾动脉假性动脉瘤:单中心分析。
目的:确定机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RaPN)后肾动脉假性动脉瘤(RAP)的发生率,确定预测因素,并评估血管内处理。方法:回顾性分析机构RaPN数据库,使用2009年12月至2021年6月的数据。应用计算机断层血管造影诊断RAP。将RaPN后接受RAP栓塞治疗的患者与不进行RAP或RAP保守治疗的患者进行比较。评估患者人口统计学、肿瘤特征和手术结果的数据,并确定RaPN后RAP的预测因素。结果:544例行RaPN的患者中,术后发生RAP 14例,其中栓塞12例。大多数患者出现肉眼血尿,并通过计算机断层血管造影诊断。随访期间无患者复发RAP。在RAP栓塞患者中发现:男性比例较高(91.7%比59.4%,p = 0.024),肾肾测量评分较高(中位数:9.0比8.0,p = 0.02),手术时间较长(平均:349.6比283.7分钟,p = 0.046),术后住院时间较长(中位数:6.0比5.0天,p = 0.031)。肾肾测量评分中,栓塞组N评分明显高于未栓塞组(p = 0.031)。单因素分析显示,肾肾测量评分和总手术时间是RAP发生的重要预测因素。结论:RAP的发生与肾肾测量评分较高、手术时间较长有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信