[The study on horizontal sound localization ability in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss].

Q4 Medicine
Q Q Hao, S Nie, J Zhang
{"title":"[The study on horizontal sound localization ability in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss].","authors":"Q Q Hao, S Nie, J Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240719-00430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the factors influencing horizontal sound localization ability in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USHL), with the aim of providing evidence-based guidance for clinical rehabilitation. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study included 43 patients diagnosed with USHL (22 males, 21 females; age range: 30-60 years, mean age: 46.5 years), recruited from Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, between October 2023 and April 2024. A control group of 20 age-matched normal-hearing participants (8 males, 12 females; mean age: 45.5 years) was also enrolled. Data collected included demographic variables, four-frequency pure-tone averages (4fPTA at 500, 1 000, 2 000, and 4 000 Hz) for both ears, and duration of hearing loss. Based on the residual hearing in the affected ear, USHL patients were divided into a group with residual hearing (defined as having at least one frequency threshold ≤65 dBHL) and a group with no detectable hearing (all frequencies >65 dBHL). Furthermore, patients in the residual hearing group were categorized by hearing loss severity into those with moderate hearing loss (35 dBHL ≤4fPTA <50 dBHL) and those with moderate-to-severe hearing loss (4fPTA≥50 dBHL). All participants underwent horizontal sound localization testing using speech stimuli under four listening conditions: quiet, and noise at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of +5 dB, 0 dB, and -5 dB. Localization performance was quantified using root-mean-square error (RMSE), and data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation in SPSS 26.0. <b>Results:</b> Both the degree of hearing loss and background SNR significantly influenced localization accuracy (hearing level: <i>F</i>=47.59, <i>P</i><0.01; SNR: <i>F</i>=69.79, <i>P</i><0.01), with a significant interaction between the two factors (<i>F</i>=2.81, <i>P</i><0.01). In quiet environments, even patients with moderate hearing loss demonstrated significantly poorer localization performance compared to normal-hearing controls (<i>P</i><0.01). Among those with residual hearing, localization ability at SNR=+5 dB was not significantly different from that in quiet (<i>P</i>>0.05), but performance deteriorated significantly at SNR=0 dB (<i>P</i><0.001). In contrast, patients without residual hearing exhibited significant deficits even at SNR=+5 dB (<i>P</i><0.001). Pearson correlation analysis revealed no significant association between RMSE and sex, age, or duration of hearing loss (all <i>P</i>>0.05). However, a strong positive correlation was observed between hearing loss severity and RMSE across all noise conditions (<i>r</i>=0.760-0.800, all <i>P</i><0.001), indicating that worse hearing thresholds were associated with poorer localization performance. <b>Conclusions:</b> Even moderate unilateral sensorineural hearing loss can impair horizontal sound localization, and this deficit is exacerbated by increasing hearing loss severity and background noise. Both hearing threshold and SNR are key determinants of localization ability and should be prioritized when designing individualized rehabilitation and intervention strategies for USHL patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"60 7","pages":"800-806"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20240719-00430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the factors influencing horizontal sound localization ability in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (USHL), with the aim of providing evidence-based guidance for clinical rehabilitation. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 43 patients diagnosed with USHL (22 males, 21 females; age range: 30-60 years, mean age: 46.5 years), recruited from Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, between October 2023 and April 2024. A control group of 20 age-matched normal-hearing participants (8 males, 12 females; mean age: 45.5 years) was also enrolled. Data collected included demographic variables, four-frequency pure-tone averages (4fPTA at 500, 1 000, 2 000, and 4 000 Hz) for both ears, and duration of hearing loss. Based on the residual hearing in the affected ear, USHL patients were divided into a group with residual hearing (defined as having at least one frequency threshold ≤65 dBHL) and a group with no detectable hearing (all frequencies >65 dBHL). Furthermore, patients in the residual hearing group were categorized by hearing loss severity into those with moderate hearing loss (35 dBHL ≤4fPTA <50 dBHL) and those with moderate-to-severe hearing loss (4fPTA≥50 dBHL). All participants underwent horizontal sound localization testing using speech stimuli under four listening conditions: quiet, and noise at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of +5 dB, 0 dB, and -5 dB. Localization performance was quantified using root-mean-square error (RMSE), and data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Pearson correlation in SPSS 26.0. Results: Both the degree of hearing loss and background SNR significantly influenced localization accuracy (hearing level: F=47.59, P<0.01; SNR: F=69.79, P<0.01), with a significant interaction between the two factors (F=2.81, P<0.01). In quiet environments, even patients with moderate hearing loss demonstrated significantly poorer localization performance compared to normal-hearing controls (P<0.01). Among those with residual hearing, localization ability at SNR=+5 dB was not significantly different from that in quiet (P>0.05), but performance deteriorated significantly at SNR=0 dB (P<0.001). In contrast, patients without residual hearing exhibited significant deficits even at SNR=+5 dB (P<0.001). Pearson correlation analysis revealed no significant association between RMSE and sex, age, or duration of hearing loss (all P>0.05). However, a strong positive correlation was observed between hearing loss severity and RMSE across all noise conditions (r=0.760-0.800, all P<0.001), indicating that worse hearing thresholds were associated with poorer localization performance. Conclusions: Even moderate unilateral sensorineural hearing loss can impair horizontal sound localization, and this deficit is exacerbated by increasing hearing loss severity and background noise. Both hearing threshold and SNR are key determinants of localization ability and should be prioritized when designing individualized rehabilitation and intervention strategies for USHL patients.

单侧感音神经性听力损失患者水平声定位能力的研究
目的:探讨单侧感音神经性听力损失(USHL)患者水平声定位能力的影响因素,为临床康复提供循证指导。方法:本横断面研究纳入首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院于2023年10月至2024年4月诊断为USHL的患者43例(男22例,女21例,年龄30 ~ 60岁,平均46.5岁)。对照组为20名年龄匹配的正常听力参与者(8名男性,12名女性,平均年龄:45.5岁)。收集的数据包括人口统计变量、双耳的四频纯音平均值(500、1 000、2 000和4 000 Hz时的4fPTA)以及听力损失的持续时间。根据患耳残余听力,将USHL患者分为残余听力组(定义为至少有一个频率阈值≤65 dBHL)和无听力组(所有频率均为bb0 ~ 65 dBHL)。结果:听力损失程度和背景信噪比均显著影响定位精度(听力水平:F=47.59, PF=69.79, PF=2.81, PPP>0.05),但在信噪比=0 dB (PPP>0.05)时,定位性能显著下降。然而,在所有噪声条件下,听力损失严重程度与RMSE之间存在很强的正相关(r=0.760-0.800)。结论:即使是中度单侧感音神经性听力损失也会损害水平声定位,并且这种缺陷会随着听力损失严重程度和背景噪声的增加而加剧。听力阈值和信噪比都是定位能力的关键决定因素,在为USHL患者设计个性化康复和干预策略时应优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
期刊介绍: Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery is a high-level medical science and technology journal sponsored and published directly by the Chinese Medical Association, reflecting the significant research progress in the field of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery in China, and striving to promote the domestic and international academic exchanges for the purpose of running the journal. Over the years, the journal has been ranked first in the total citation frequency list of national scientific and technical journals published by the Documentation and Intelligence Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the China Science Citation Database, and has always ranked first among the scientific and technical journals in the related fields. Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery has been included in the authoritative databases PubMed, Chinese core journals, CSCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信