[A prospective controlled study on degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with three steps and nine methods combined with physiotherapy].

Q4 Medicine
Shu-Ming Zhang, Jia-le Zheng, Huan-Huan Gu, Jin-Hai Xu, Wen Mo
{"title":"[A prospective controlled study on degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis treated with three steps and nine methods combined with physiotherapy].","authors":"Shu-Ming Zhang, Jia-le Zheng, Huan-Huan Gu, Jin-Hai Xu, Wen Mo","doi":"10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of the \"Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction\" combined with physical therapy in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2021 to December 2021, 72 patients diagnosed with DLS were enrolled and divided into the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction group and the pelvic traction group, with 36 cases in each group. In the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction group, there were 15 males and 21 females;aged 54 to 66 years old, with an average of (59.07±5.69) years old;the course of disease was 14 to 26 years old, with an average of (20.35±5.66) years old. They were treated with the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction combined with low-frequency physical therapy, 3 times a week, for a 4-week course. In the pelvic traction group, there were 12 males and 24 females;aged 54 to 66 years old, with an average of (59.69±5.59) years old;the course of disease was 13 to 26 years old, with an average of (19.74±5.80) years old. They were treated with pelvic traction combined with low-frequency physical therapy. Efficacy evaluation was conducted using the visual analogue scale(VAS), Oswestry disability index(ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) before treatment, after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 8-week follow-up after the end of treatment. In addition, imaging parameters of paravertebral muscles were evaluated before treatment and at the completion of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 72 patients completed the follow-up for 8 weeks. At the 8-week follow-up after the end of treatment, in the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction group, the VAS score for low back pain decreased from (6.25±1.23) points before treatment to (1.25±0.65) points, with a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i><0.05);the ODI decreased from (57.17±7.13)% before treatment to (19.89±5.66)%, with a statistically significant difference (<i>P</i><0.05);the JOA score and SF-36 score increased from (15.46±3.20) points and (35.25±9.28) points before treatment to (23.75±2.10) points and (62.31±13.03) points, respectively, with statistically significant differences (<i>P</i><0.05). The improvement of each index in the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction group was better than that in the pelvic traction group (<i>P</i><0.05), but the change in imaging parameters was not significant (<i>P</i>>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (<i>P</i>>0.05), and no serious adverse events occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction combined with physical therapy has a definite efficacy in the treatment of DLS. It can significantly relieve pain symptoms, improve physical function and patients' quality of life. Its effect is better than that of pelvic traction combined with physical therapy, and it has high safety. However, its improvement on paravertebral muscles is not obvious.</p>","PeriodicalId":23964,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","volume":"38 8","pages":"769-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20240592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of the "Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction" combined with physical therapy in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis(DLS).

Methods: From January 2021 to December 2021, 72 patients diagnosed with DLS were enrolled and divided into the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction group and the pelvic traction group, with 36 cases in each group. In the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction group, there were 15 males and 21 females;aged 54 to 66 years old, with an average of (59.07±5.69) years old;the course of disease was 14 to 26 years old, with an average of (20.35±5.66) years old. They were treated with the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction combined with low-frequency physical therapy, 3 times a week, for a 4-week course. In the pelvic traction group, there were 12 males and 24 females;aged 54 to 66 years old, with an average of (59.69±5.59) years old;the course of disease was 13 to 26 years old, with an average of (19.74±5.80) years old. They were treated with pelvic traction combined with low-frequency physical therapy. Efficacy evaluation was conducted using the visual analogue scale(VAS), Oswestry disability index(ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) before treatment, after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, and at the 8-week follow-up after the end of treatment. In addition, imaging parameters of paravertebral muscles were evaluated before treatment and at the completion of treatment.

Results: All 72 patients completed the follow-up for 8 weeks. At the 8-week follow-up after the end of treatment, in the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction group, the VAS score for low back pain decreased from (6.25±1.23) points before treatment to (1.25±0.65) points, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05);the ODI decreased from (57.17±7.13)% before treatment to (19.89±5.66)%, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05);the JOA score and SF-36 score increased from (15.46±3.20) points and (35.25±9.28) points before treatment to (23.75±2.10) points and (62.31±13.03) points, respectively, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The improvement of each index in the Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction group was better than that in the pelvic traction group (P<0.05), but the change in imaging parameters was not significant (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05), and no serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: The Three-Step Nine-Method Lumbar Correction combined with physical therapy has a definite efficacy in the treatment of DLS. It can significantly relieve pain symptoms, improve physical function and patients' quality of life. Its effect is better than that of pelvic traction combined with physical therapy, and it has high safety. However, its improvement on paravertebral muscles is not obvious.

[三步九法结合理疗治疗退行性腰椎滑脱的前瞻性对照研究]。
目的:探讨“三步九法腰椎矫正”联合物理治疗退行性腰椎滑脱(DLS)的临床疗效和安全性。方法:选取2021年1月至2021年12月诊断为DLS的患者72例,分为三步九法腰椎矫正组和盆腔牵引组,每组36例。三步九法腰椎矫正组男性15例,女性21例;年龄54 ~ 66岁,平均(59.07±5.69)岁;病程14 ~ 26岁,平均(20.35±5.66)岁。采用三步九法腰椎矫正结合低频物理治疗,每周3次,疗程为4周。盆腔牵引组男性12例,女性24例;年龄54 ~ 66岁,平均(59.69±5.59)岁;病程13 ~ 26岁,平均(19.74±5.80)岁。盆腔牵引联合低频物理治疗。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、SF-36健康问卷(SF-36)进行疗效评价,分别于治疗前、治疗后2周、4周及治疗结束后8周随访。此外,在治疗前和治疗结束时评估椎旁肌肉的影像学参数。结果:72例患者均完成随访8周。治疗结束后8周随访,三步九法腰椎矫正组腰痛VAS评分由治疗前的(6.25±1.23)分下降至(1.25±0.65)分,差异有统计学意义(PPPPP>0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05),均未发生严重不良事件。结论:三步九法腰椎矫正配合物理疗法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效确切。能显著缓解疼痛症状,改善身体机能,提高患者生活质量。其效果优于盆腔牵引联合物理治疗,且安全性高。然而,其对椎旁肌肉的改善并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
189
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信