{"title":"Post-endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy stent impaction leading to exacerbation of appendicitis: A case report.","authors":"Tan-Tu Ma, Hao-Run Lyu","doi":"10.12998/wjcc.v13.i25.106587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is an emerging technique. However, its efficacy remains uncertain, and postoperative complications often exacerbate inflammation, thereby increasing the difficulty of surgery. The use of ERAT in appendicitis remains contentious, prompting the presentation of this case report.</p><p><strong>Case summary: </strong>We report the case of a 43-year-old female patient presenting with intermittent right lower abdominal pain for one day. The patient had undergone ERAT six months previously. Examination revealed stent impaction in the appendix, leading to exacerbated inflammation. Subsequently, a solo single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SSLA) was performed. The ERAT-related complications increased surgical difficulty and prolonged the operation time. Post-SSLA, the patient was hospitalized for one day and showed favorable recovery upon follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case highlights the risks of ERAT. Thorough preoperative assessment, proper stent placement during surgery and regular postoperative follow-up are crucial in preventing complications, as their occurrence can increase surgical difficulty. Compared to ERAT, SSLA remains more widely used in clinical practice. Both techniques require further clinical data and research to optimize their application.</p>","PeriodicalId":23912,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Clinical Cases","volume":"13 25","pages":"106587"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Clinical Cases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v13.i25.106587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is an emerging technique. However, its efficacy remains uncertain, and postoperative complications often exacerbate inflammation, thereby increasing the difficulty of surgery. The use of ERAT in appendicitis remains contentious, prompting the presentation of this case report.
Case summary: We report the case of a 43-year-old female patient presenting with intermittent right lower abdominal pain for one day. The patient had undergone ERAT six months previously. Examination revealed stent impaction in the appendix, leading to exacerbated inflammation. Subsequently, a solo single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SSLA) was performed. The ERAT-related complications increased surgical difficulty and prolonged the operation time. Post-SSLA, the patient was hospitalized for one day and showed favorable recovery upon follow-up.
Conclusion: This case highlights the risks of ERAT. Thorough preoperative assessment, proper stent placement during surgery and regular postoperative follow-up are crucial in preventing complications, as their occurrence can increase surgical difficulty. Compared to ERAT, SSLA remains more widely used in clinical practice. Both techniques require further clinical data and research to optimize their application.
期刊介绍:
The World Journal of Clinical Cases (WJCC) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJCC is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of clinical cases. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJCC is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJCC are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in clinical cases.