Thirty years of high-voltage injuries: comparative analysis of train surfing and work-related cases with a focus on trauma-associated diagnoses.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
V Koenig, A Fochtmann-Frana, P Tratnig-Frankl, M Monai, J Joestl
{"title":"Thirty years of high-voltage injuries: comparative analysis of train surfing and work-related cases with a focus on trauma-associated diagnoses.","authors":"V Koenig, A Fochtmann-Frana, P Tratnig-Frankl, M Monai, J Joestl","doi":"10.1007/s00508-025-02591-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High-voltage electrical injuries from train surfing pose a unique challenge, often involving severe burns and multisystem trauma. This study retrospectively analyzed train surfing injuries over 30 years, with a focus on trauma-associated diagnoses and comparing them to work-related high-voltage injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 87 high-voltage injury cases was conducted, including 30 train surfing and 57 work-related cases. Demographics, injury patterns, injury time, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, surgical interventions, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, accident timing and trauma scores (Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Score (NACA), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Train surfers were significantly younger (20.6 years vs. 36.0 years, p < 0.001) and sustained more severe burns (Total Body Surface Area (TBSA): 46.5% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001). The ABSI (7.1 vs. 5.1, p < 0.01) and ISS (25.0 vs. 12.0, p < 0.001) were higher in train surfers, reflecting greater injury severity. The ICU stays were longer (56.1 days vs. 15.8 days, p < 0.001) and fasciotomies (86.7% vs. 53.0%, p < 0.01) and amputations (56.7% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001) were more frequent. Train surfers exhibited worse metabolic parameters (base excess -4.49 vs. -0.7 mmol/L, p < 0.001; lactate 3.2 vs. 2.6 mmol/L, p < 0.05) and higher AIS scores for head and thoracic trauma. The GCS at the accident site was lower in train surfers (11.1 vs. 13.0, p = 0.10), indicating more severe initial impairment. Accidents predominantly occurred at night (69.9% of train surfing cases vs. 3.5% of work-related cases, p < 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in the train surfing group (20.0% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Train surfing injuries involve extensive burns, severe multisystem trauma, and a higher surgical burden compared to work-related injuries. Their distinct injury patterns necessitate targeted prevention and specialized trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02591-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High-voltage electrical injuries from train surfing pose a unique challenge, often involving severe burns and multisystem trauma. This study retrospectively analyzed train surfing injuries over 30 years, with a focus on trauma-associated diagnoses and comparing them to work-related high-voltage injuries.

Methods: A retrospective review of 87 high-voltage injury cases was conducted, including 30 train surfing and 57 work-related cases. Demographics, injury patterns, injury time, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, surgical interventions, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, accident timing and trauma scores (Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics Score (NACA), Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)) were analyzed.

Results: Train surfers were significantly younger (20.6 years vs. 36.0 years, p < 0.001) and sustained more severe burns (Total Body Surface Area (TBSA): 46.5% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001). The ABSI (7.1 vs. 5.1, p < 0.01) and ISS (25.0 vs. 12.0, p < 0.001) were higher in train surfers, reflecting greater injury severity. The ICU stays were longer (56.1 days vs. 15.8 days, p < 0.001) and fasciotomies (86.7% vs. 53.0%, p < 0.01) and amputations (56.7% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001) were more frequent. Train surfers exhibited worse metabolic parameters (base excess -4.49 vs. -0.7 mmol/L, p < 0.001; lactate 3.2 vs. 2.6 mmol/L, p < 0.05) and higher AIS scores for head and thoracic trauma. The GCS at the accident site was lower in train surfers (11.1 vs. 13.0, p = 0.10), indicating more severe initial impairment. Accidents predominantly occurred at night (69.9% of train surfing cases vs. 3.5% of work-related cases, p < 0.001). Mortality was significantly higher in the train surfing group (20.0% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Train surfing injuries involve extensive burns, severe multisystem trauma, and a higher surgical burden compared to work-related injuries. Their distinct injury patterns necessitate targeted prevention and specialized trauma care.

三十年的高压损伤:火车冲浪和工作相关病例的比较分析,重点是创伤相关诊断。
导读:列车冲浪造成的高压电气伤害带来了独特的挑战,通常涉及严重烧伤和多系统创伤。本研究回顾性分析了30多年来的火车冲浪损伤,重点关注与创伤相关的诊断,并将其与工作相关的高压损伤进行比较。方法:对87例高电压损伤病例进行回顾性分析,其中列车冲浪30例,工伤57例。分析人口统计学、损伤模式、损伤时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、手术干预、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、事故发生时间和创伤评分(简略烧伤严重程度指数(ABSI)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、简略伤害量表(AIS)、国家航空咨询委员会评分(NACA)、格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS))。结果:火车冲浪者明显更年轻(20.6岁对36.0岁,p )。结论:火车冲浪者损伤包括大面积烧伤,严重的多系统创伤,与工作伤害相比,手术负担更高。他们独特的损伤模式需要有针对性的预防和专门的创伤护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信