World-wide variation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy practices: evaluation based on training, experience, and region.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kavita Gupta, Ziv Savin, Dara Lundon, Christopher Connors, Juan Serna, Anna Ricapito, Raymond Khargi, Roman Shimonov, Alan J Yaghoubian, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta
{"title":"World-wide variation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy practices: evaluation based on training, experience, and region.","authors":"Kavita Gupta, Ziv Savin, Dara Lundon, Christopher Connors, Juan Serna, Anna Ricapito, Raymond Khargi, Roman Shimonov, Alan J Yaghoubian, Blair Gallante, William M Atallah, Mantu Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05901-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has undergone numerous technological innovations recently that make it even less invasive, but global adoption of these innovations remains unclear. This study sought to compare the effect of region and education on the penetrance of recent advances in PCNL worldwide.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous 32-item survey was developed and distributed via the Endourological Society's Twitter/X account in November 2023. The survey collected data on participants' geographic region, PCNL volume, fellowship training, and PCNL practices. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 160 PCNL providers worldwide. Respondents were categorized by geography, fellowship training, and procedural volume. Spinal anesthesia was more commonly used by Asian providers (31%, p = 0.001), while supine positioning was notably more common in Europe (76%, p = 0.001). Asian providers favored pneumatic energy (63%), while North American and European providers more frequently used dual energy lithotripters (31-72%) and hemostatic tract agents (p < 0.001). High-volume providers and those with more post-fellowship experience tended to use smaller sheaths, including mini-PCNL. Postoperative imaging practices also varied by region and fellowship-training status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCNL practices vary significantly worldwide, influenced by regional, economic, and experiential factors. Our survey indicates a significant shift in practices with 41% of providers using supine position and over 50% doing tubeless PCNL. However, ultrasound access has been slow to gain widespread use with 73% still using predominantly fluoroscopy, similar to prior studies. Further randomized studies are needed to establish the clinical effectiveness of new technologies and to drive standardization of care across geographic and economic barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05901-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has undergone numerous technological innovations recently that make it even less invasive, but global adoption of these innovations remains unclear. This study sought to compare the effect of region and education on the penetrance of recent advances in PCNL worldwide.

Methods: An anonymous 32-item survey was developed and distributed via the Endourological Society's Twitter/X account in November 2023. The survey collected data on participants' geographic region, PCNL volume, fellowship training, and PCNL practices. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used for comparisons.

Results: Responses were received from 160 PCNL providers worldwide. Respondents were categorized by geography, fellowship training, and procedural volume. Spinal anesthesia was more commonly used by Asian providers (31%, p = 0.001), while supine positioning was notably more common in Europe (76%, p = 0.001). Asian providers favored pneumatic energy (63%), while North American and European providers more frequently used dual energy lithotripters (31-72%) and hemostatic tract agents (p < 0.001). High-volume providers and those with more post-fellowship experience tended to use smaller sheaths, including mini-PCNL. Postoperative imaging practices also varied by region and fellowship-training status.

Conclusion: PCNL practices vary significantly worldwide, influenced by regional, economic, and experiential factors. Our survey indicates a significant shift in practices with 41% of providers using supine position and over 50% doing tubeless PCNL. However, ultrasound access has been slow to gain widespread use with 73% still using predominantly fluoroscopy, similar to prior studies. Further randomized studies are needed to establish the clinical effectiveness of new technologies and to drive standardization of care across geographic and economic barriers.

经皮肾镜取石术的世界范围差异:基于培训、经验和地区的评估。
导读:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)最近经历了许多技术创新,使其侵入性更小,但这些创新的全球采用尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较地区和教育对全球PCNL最新进展的外显率的影响。方法:于2023年11月通过endourology Society的Twitter/X账户进行了一份32项的匿名调查。调查收集了参与者的地理区域、PCNL数量、奖学金培训和PCNL实践的数据。计算描述性统计量,并使用卡方检验或费雪精确检验进行比较。结果:我们收到了来自全球160家PCNL供应商的反馈。受访者按地理位置、奖学金培训和程序数量进行分类。亚洲医生更常使用脊髓麻醉(31%,p = 0.001),而仰卧位在欧洲更常见(76%,p = 0.001)。亚洲医生偏爱气动能(63%),而北美和欧洲医生更常使用双能碎石机(31-72%)和止血剂(p结论:PCNL的做法在世界范围内差异很大,受地区、经济和经验因素的影响。我们的调查显示,41%的提供者使用仰卧位,超过50%的提供者使用无管PCNL,这在实践中发生了重大变化。然而,超声检查的广泛应用进展缓慢,73%的人仍然主要使用透视检查,与先前的研究相似。需要进一步的随机研究来确定新技术的临床有效性,并推动跨越地理和经济障碍的护理标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信