Development and validation of screening tools for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in community settings.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Li-Ming Su, Bei Wu, Zhang Chen, Xiao-Yan Wang, Xin-Hua Shen, Zhu-Qin Wei, Huang Cheng, Li-Na Wang
{"title":"Development and validation of screening tools for motoric cognitive risk syndrome in community settings.","authors":"Li-Ming Su, Bei Wu, Zhang Chen, Xiao-Yan Wang, Xin-Hua Shen, Zhu-Qin Wei, Huang Cheng, Li-Na Wang","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.105433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome represents an \"ultra-early\" stage of dementia prevention, highlighting the need for effective screening tools.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate a novel tool for MCR identification, comparing its effectiveness with existing methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a community study on healthy aging, a cross-sectional study recruited 1189 Chinese participants aged 50 years and older between May 1, 2022, and March 15, 2023. The cohort was randomly split into training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Relevant features were selected for logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) models using the training dataset, and their performance was subsequently assessed using the testing dataset to validate reliability and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of MCR was 13.12% among 1189 participants. DT models had the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.834 and 0.821 for training and testing datasets, respectively, while LR models indicated AUCs of 0.840 and 0.859. Non-inferiority tests confirmed the DT model's comparable effectiveness to the LR models in predicting MCR. Both models demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility. Seven modifiable risk factors were identified: Age, education level, social engagement, physical activity, nutritional status, depressive symptoms, and purpose in life. Notably, social engagement emerged as a novel factor compared to those previously identified. Both models are integrated into an easy-to-use, interpretable web-based user interface.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interactive, web-based user interface of both models effectively identifies MCR, with the DT model recommended for its simplicity and interpretability, supporting community nurses and clinicians in triaging MCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 8","pages":"105433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.105433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Motoric cognitive risk (MCR) syndrome represents an "ultra-early" stage of dementia prevention, highlighting the need for effective screening tools.

Aim: To develop and validate a novel tool for MCR identification, comparing its effectiveness with existing methods.

Methods: As part of a community study on healthy aging, a cross-sectional study recruited 1189 Chinese participants aged 50 years and older between May 1, 2022, and March 15, 2023. The cohort was randomly split into training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Relevant features were selected for logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) models using the training dataset, and their performance was subsequently assessed using the testing dataset to validate reliability and generalizability.

Results: The prevalence of MCR was 13.12% among 1189 participants. DT models had the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.834 and 0.821 for training and testing datasets, respectively, while LR models indicated AUCs of 0.840 and 0.859. Non-inferiority tests confirmed the DT model's comparable effectiveness to the LR models in predicting MCR. Both models demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility. Seven modifiable risk factors were identified: Age, education level, social engagement, physical activity, nutritional status, depressive symptoms, and purpose in life. Notably, social engagement emerged as a novel factor compared to those previously identified. Both models are integrated into an easy-to-use, interpretable web-based user interface.

Conclusion: The interactive, web-based user interface of both models effectively identifies MCR, with the DT model recommended for its simplicity and interpretability, supporting community nurses and clinicians in triaging MCR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社区环境中运动认知风险综合征筛查工具的开发和验证。
背景:运动认知风险(MCR)综合征代表了痴呆症预防的“超早期”阶段,突出了对有效筛查工具的需求。目的:开发和验证一种新的MCR鉴定工具,并将其与现有方法的有效性进行比较。方法:作为健康老龄化社区研究的一部分,一项横断面研究在2022年5月1日至2023年3月15日期间招募了1189名50岁及以上的中国参与者。该队列随机分为训练(70%)和测试(30%)数据集。使用训练数据集为逻辑回归(LR)和决策树(DT)模型选择相关特征,随后使用测试数据集评估其性能以验证可靠性和泛化性。结果:1189名参与者中MCR患病率为13.12%。DT模型的训练集和测试集曲线下面积(auc)分别为0.834和0.821,LR模型的auc分别为0.840和0.859。非劣效性检验证实了DT模型与LR模型在预测MCR方面的可比性。两种模型均具有良好的校准效果和临床应用价值。确定了七个可改变的危险因素:年龄、教育水平、社会参与、体育活动、营养状况、抑郁症状和生活目标。值得注意的是,与之前确定的因素相比,社会参与成为了一个新的因素。这两个模型都集成到一个易于使用、可解释的基于web的用户界面中。结论:两种模型的交互式、基于网络的用户界面都能有效识别MCR, DT模型因其简单和可解释性而被推荐,支持社区护士和临床医生对MCR进行分诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信