Different titration protocols in pain management after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Bin-Bin Chen, Wei Tu, Ai-Dan Xia, Miao-Yong Zhu, Zi-Jie Wang
{"title":"Different titration protocols in pain management after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients.","authors":"Bin-Bin Chen, Wei Tu, Ai-Dan Xia, Miao-Yong Zhu, Zi-Jie Wang","doi":"10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.108238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective pain management after radical gastrectomy is crucial for patient recovery. With the promotion of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, postoperative pain management has become a core component of perioperative care. However, controversy remains regarding the optimal frequency of analgesic titration for pain control.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the efficacy of 12-hour <i>vs</i> 24-hour titration regimens in postoperative pain management following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study analyzed data from 120 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between January 2021 and December 2022, with 52 patients receiving a 12-hour titration regimen and 68 patients receiving a 24-hour titration regimen. All patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia containing sufentanil and tropisetron postoperatively with identical initial settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 12-hour titration group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 12 hours postoperatively compared to the 24-hour group (3.2 <i>vs</i> 4.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001); total analgesic consumption (morphine equivalents) was reduced by 28.6% (30 mg <i>vs</i> 42 mg, <i>P</i> < 0.001); postoperative nausea and vomiting decreased by 50% (15% <i>vs</i> 30%, <i>P</i> = 0.02); respiratory depression was less frequent (2% <i>vs</i> 8%, <i>P</i> = 0.04); patient satisfaction was higher (85% <i>vs</i> 65% reporting \"very satisfied\" or \"satisfied\", <i>P</i> < 0.001); and hospital stay was shortened by 12.5% (4.2 days <i>vs</i> 4.8 days, <i>P</i> = 0.02). Cox regression analysis showed that the 12-hour regimen was associated with a lower risk of prolonged high-intensity pain (hazard ratio = 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.93, <i>P</i> = 0.02), and multivariate regression analysis confirmed that the 12-hour regimen was an independent predictor of better overall recovery (β = -0.32, <i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the 24-hour titration regimen, the 12-hour titration regimen provided more effective control of early postoperative pain after radical gastrectomy, reduced total analgesic consumption, lowered the incidence of related adverse reactions, improved patient satisfaction, and shortened hospital stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":23762,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"17 8","pages":"108238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.108238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective pain management after radical gastrectomy is crucial for patient recovery. With the promotion of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, postoperative pain management has become a core component of perioperative care. However, controversy remains regarding the optimal frequency of analgesic titration for pain control.

Aim: To compare the efficacy of 12-hour vs 24-hour titration regimens in postoperative pain management following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods: This retrospective comparative study analyzed data from 120 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between January 2021 and December 2022, with 52 patients receiving a 12-hour titration regimen and 68 patients receiving a 24-hour titration regimen. All patients received patient-controlled intravenous analgesia containing sufentanil and tropisetron postoperatively with identical initial settings.

Results: The 12-hour titration group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 12 hours postoperatively compared to the 24-hour group (3.2 vs 4.8, P < 0.001); total analgesic consumption (morphine equivalents) was reduced by 28.6% (30 mg vs 42 mg, P < 0.001); postoperative nausea and vomiting decreased by 50% (15% vs 30%, P = 0.02); respiratory depression was less frequent (2% vs 8%, P = 0.04); patient satisfaction was higher (85% vs 65% reporting "very satisfied" or "satisfied", P < 0.001); and hospital stay was shortened by 12.5% (4.2 days vs 4.8 days, P = 0.02). Cox regression analysis showed that the 12-hour regimen was associated with a lower risk of prolonged high-intensity pain (hazard ratio = 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.93, P = 0.02), and multivariate regression analysis confirmed that the 12-hour regimen was an independent predictor of better overall recovery (β = -0.32, P = 0.01).

Conclusion: Compared to the 24-hour titration regimen, the 12-hour titration regimen provided more effective control of early postoperative pain after radical gastrectomy, reduced total analgesic consumption, lowered the incidence of related adverse reactions, improved patient satisfaction, and shortened hospital stays.

Abstract Image

不同滴定方案在胃癌根治术后疼痛管理中的应用。
背景:有效的疼痛管理是根治性胃切除术后患者康复的关键。随着增强术后恢复方案的推广,术后疼痛管理已成为围手术期护理的核心组成部分。然而,关于疼痛控制的最佳镇痛滴定频率仍然存在争议。目的:比较12小时滴药与24小时滴药在胃癌根治术后疼痛管理中的疗效。方法:本回顾性比较研究分析了2021年1月至2022年12月期间接受根治性胃切除术的120例患者的数据,其中52例患者接受12小时滴药方案,68例患者接受24小时滴药方案。所有患者术后在相同的初始设置下接受含有舒芬太尼和托司司琼的患者控制静脉镇痛。结果:12小时滴药组术后12小时疼痛评分明显低于24小时组(3.2 vs 4.8, P < 0.001);镇痛药总用量(吗啡当量)减少28.6% (30 mg vs 42 mg, P < 0.001);术后恶心呕吐减少50% (15% vs 30%, P = 0.02);呼吸抑制发生率较低(2% vs 8%, P = 0.04);患者满意度较高(85% vs 65%报告“非常满意”或“满意”,P < 0.001);住院时间缩短12.5%(4.2天vs 4.8天,P = 0.02)。Cox回归分析显示,12小时治疗方案与较低的持续高强度疼痛风险相关(风险比= 0.65,95%可信区间:0.45-0.93,P = 0.02),多因素回归分析证实,12小时治疗方案是较好的总体恢复的独立预测因子(β = -0.32, P = 0.01)。结论:与24小时滴药方案相比,12小时滴药方案更有效地控制了胃癌根治术后早期疼痛,减少了镇痛总用量,降低了相关不良反应的发生率,提高了患者满意度,缩短了住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
1082
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (WJGO) is a leading academic journal devoted to reporting the latest, cutting-edge research progress and findings of basic research and clinical practice in the field of gastrointestinal oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信