Cost-effectiveness analysis of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in China.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hansoo Kim, Joshua Byrnes, Kui-Rong Jiang, Zhuan Liao, Arun Jones, Kyoo Kim, Dafni Fragkogianni, Keith J Roberts
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness analysis of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in China.","authors":"Hansoo Kim, Joshua Byrnes, Kui-Rong Jiang, Zhuan Liao, Arun Jones, Kyoo Kim, Dafni Fragkogianni, Keith J Roberts","doi":"10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.109544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) leads to fat malabsorption and maldigestion and is most commonly treated with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). Patients suffering from PEI in China are more likely not to receive adequate treatment as this drug is not part of the Chinese national essential medicine list.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the cost-effectiveness of PERT for patients suffering from PEI in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A decision analytical Markov model was constructed to simulate the progress of patients with PEI in China. The population included in the analyses were patients suffering from PEI with advanced (non-resectable) pancreatic cancer, who have undergone surgery due to pancreatic cancer and who have undergone endoscopic treatment due to chronic pancreatitis. The cost-effectiveness analyses were undertaken from a Chinese societal perspective comparing PERT with no PERT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in United States dollars <i>per</i> quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained is the main outcome. Input was informed by publicly available data supplemented with expert clinical advice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cost-effectiveness analyses estimated that PERT resulted in additional 0.45 to 2.93 QALYs at discounted costs of between 4315 dollars to 15193 dollars. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 5178 dollars to 9533 dollars <i>per</i> QALY. The one-way sensitivity analyses showed that the main drivers of the model were the cost of PERT and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that PERT is a cost-effective treatment for patients suffering from PEI in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":23762,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"17 8","pages":"109544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.109544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) leads to fat malabsorption and maldigestion and is most commonly treated with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). Patients suffering from PEI in China are more likely not to receive adequate treatment as this drug is not part of the Chinese national essential medicine list.

Aim: To examine the cost-effectiveness of PERT for patients suffering from PEI in China.

Methods: A decision analytical Markov model was constructed to simulate the progress of patients with PEI in China. The population included in the analyses were patients suffering from PEI with advanced (non-resectable) pancreatic cancer, who have undergone surgery due to pancreatic cancer and who have undergone endoscopic treatment due to chronic pancreatitis. The cost-effectiveness analyses were undertaken from a Chinese societal perspective comparing PERT with no PERT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in United States dollars per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained is the main outcome. Input was informed by publicly available data supplemented with expert clinical advice.

Results: The cost-effectiveness analyses estimated that PERT resulted in additional 0.45 to 2.93 QALYs at discounted costs of between 4315 dollars to 15193 dollars. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 5178 dollars to 9533 dollars per QALY. The one-way sensitivity analyses showed that the main drivers of the model were the cost of PERT and overall survival.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that PERT is a cost-effective treatment for patients suffering from PEI in China.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中国胰腺外分泌功能不全患者胰酶替代治疗的成本-效果分析。
背景:胰腺外分泌功能不全(PEI)导致脂肪吸收不良和消化不良,最常用胰酶替代疗法(PERT)治疗。在中国,由于这种药物不属于中国国家基本药物目录,PEI患者更有可能得不到充分的治疗。目的:探讨PERT治疗PEI患者的成本-效果。方法:建立决策分析马尔可夫模型,模拟中国PEI患者的病情进展。纳入分析的人群包括PEI合并晚期(不可切除)胰腺癌的患者,因胰腺癌接受手术的患者和因慢性胰腺炎接受内窥镜治疗的患者。从中国社会的角度进行成本-效果分析,比较PERT与不PERT。主要结果是以美元计算的每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比。输入的信息由公开数据提供,并辅以专家临床建议。结果:成本效益分析估计,PERT以4315美元至15193美元的折扣成本导致额外的0.45至2.93个qaly。这导致每个QALY的增量成本效益比为5178美元对9533美元。单向敏感性分析显示,模型的主要驱动因素是PERT的成本和总生存期。结论:本研究表明PERT是中国PEI患者的一种经济有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
1082
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (WJGO) is a leading academic journal devoted to reporting the latest, cutting-edge research progress and findings of basic research and clinical practice in the field of gastrointestinal oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信