Predictive tools and scoring systems for surgical intervention in antenatal hydronephrosis and pelviureteric junction obstruction: An ATLAS based on comprehensive review of literature.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_88_25
Leo Edward Fitzgerald Gradwell, Abdullah Khalid Fouda Neel, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"Predictive tools and scoring systems for surgical intervention in antenatal hydronephrosis and pelviureteric junction obstruction: An ATLAS based on comprehensive review of literature.","authors":"Leo Edward Fitzgerald Gradwell, Abdullah Khalid Fouda Neel, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_88_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antenatal hydronephrosis (ANH) is detected in up to 5% of pregnancies and is most commonly caused by pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). While many cases resolve spontaneously, subset of patients require surgical intervention. Differentiating between these groups remains a clinical challenge, often leading to unnecessary investigations or delayed treatment. Numerous scoring systems and predictive tools have been developed to support risk stratification, yet none have achieved universal adoption. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE and Google Scholar was performed to identify scoring systems, predictive models, and tools designed to predict the need for surgical intervention in patients with ANH or confirmed PUJO. Search terms included variations of \"PUJO,\" \"prognosis,\" \"predictor,\" and \"surgery.\" Included studies described original tools or external validation of models using radiological parameters to stratify risk. Each tool was appraised for input parameters, derivation methodology, outcome definitions, external validation, and clinical applicability. Nine predictive tools were identified, all based on imaging data, with one incorporating machine learning (ML). Eight of nine tools aimed to predict the need for pyeloplasty. Four tools have undergone some form of external validation. Most tools used numerical scores, one applied a visual grading system, and another used a nonpercentage-based ML approach. While several demonstrated high predictive accuracy, limitations included retrospective design, small sample sizes, subjective imaging interpretation, and lack of consistent surgical outcome definitions. Despite growing interest and several promising models, no tool has yet been externally validated in large, diverse prospective cohorts. Further research is needed to develop clinically robust, generalizable tools for early risk stratification in ANH.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 3","pages":"133-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_88_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antenatal hydronephrosis (ANH) is detected in up to 5% of pregnancies and is most commonly caused by pelviureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). While many cases resolve spontaneously, subset of patients require surgical intervention. Differentiating between these groups remains a clinical challenge, often leading to unnecessary investigations or delayed treatment. Numerous scoring systems and predictive tools have been developed to support risk stratification, yet none have achieved universal adoption. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE and Google Scholar was performed to identify scoring systems, predictive models, and tools designed to predict the need for surgical intervention in patients with ANH or confirmed PUJO. Search terms included variations of "PUJO," "prognosis," "predictor," and "surgery." Included studies described original tools or external validation of models using radiological parameters to stratify risk. Each tool was appraised for input parameters, derivation methodology, outcome definitions, external validation, and clinical applicability. Nine predictive tools were identified, all based on imaging data, with one incorporating machine learning (ML). Eight of nine tools aimed to predict the need for pyeloplasty. Four tools have undergone some form of external validation. Most tools used numerical scores, one applied a visual grading system, and another used a nonpercentage-based ML approach. While several demonstrated high predictive accuracy, limitations included retrospective design, small sample sizes, subjective imaging interpretation, and lack of consistent surgical outcome definitions. Despite growing interest and several promising models, no tool has yet been externally validated in large, diverse prospective cohorts. Further research is needed to develop clinically robust, generalizable tools for early risk stratification in ANH.

产前肾积水和肾盂输尿管交界处梗阻手术干预的预测工具和评分系统:基于文献综合回顾的ATLAS。
产前肾积水(ANH)在高达5%的妊娠中被检测到,最常见的是由肾盂输尿管交界处阻塞(PUJO)引起的。虽然许多病例自发消退,但部分患者需要手术干预。区分这些群体仍然是一项临床挑战,经常导致不必要的调查或延迟治疗。已经开发了许多评分系统和预测工具来支持风险分层,但没有一个实现普遍采用。我们对MEDLINE和谷歌Scholar进行了全面的文献检索,以确定评分系统、预测模型和工具,用于预测ANH或确诊PUJO患者是否需要手术干预。搜索词包括“PUJO”、“预后”、“预测器”和“手术”。纳入的研究描述了使用放射学参数进行风险分层的原始工具或模型的外部验证。对每个工具的输入参数、推导方法、结果定义、外部验证和临床适用性进行评估。确定了9种预测工具,均基于成像数据,其中一种结合了机器学习(ML)。9个工具中的8个旨在预测肾盂成形术的需要。有四种工具经历了某种形式的外部验证。大多数工具使用数字分数,一个应用视觉评分系统,另一个使用非基于百分比的ML方法。虽然有几个显示出较高的预测准确性,但局限性包括回顾性设计、小样本量、主观影像学解释和缺乏一致的手术结果定义。尽管越来越多的人对此感兴趣,也有一些很有前景的模型,但目前还没有工具在大型、多样化的前瞻性队列中得到外部验证。需要进一步的研究来开发临床可靠的、可推广的工具来进行ANH的早期风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信