A comparative study of perioperative outcomes in open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_98_24
Vishal Narkhede, Siddhant Bolar, Deepanshu Aggarwal, Rudra Prasad Ghorai, Sidhartha Kalra, Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan, Sreerag Kodakkattil Sreenivasan
{"title":"A comparative study of perioperative outcomes in open radical cystectomy, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy.","authors":"Vishal Narkhede, Siddhant Bolar, Deepanshu Aggarwal, Rudra Prasad Ghorai, Sidhartha Kalra, Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan, Sreerag Kodakkattil Sreenivasan","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_98_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive and high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. The impact of minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) such as laparoscopic and robot-assisted RC (RARC) on outcomes and morbidity remains debated, especially in India. This study compares perioperative outcomes and complications of open RC (ORC), laparoscopic RC (LRC), and RARC.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included 186 patients who underwent ORC, LRC, or RARC at our institution between October 2013 and April 2024. Preoperative parameters such as age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and chemotherapy status were recorded. Postoperative parameters including operative time, blood loss, return of bowel function, complications, and survival rates were analyzed. Pathological parameters such as stages, lymph node yield, and positive surgical margins were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 120 ORC, 56 RARC, and 10 LRC patients. The median age was highest in the laparoscopic group (67.4 ± 6.33 years) with a higher BMI (26.22 ± 5.24). Operative time was longest for RARC (414 ± 115.7 min) versus 357.96 ± 60.08 for ORC (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.0001), but blood loss was lowest (413.39 ± 165.55 ml) versus 518.33 ± 171.49 for ORC (<i>P</i> = 0.0001). Return of bowel function was fastest in the RARC group (4.27 + 2.79 days). Complications were highest in the ORC group (70.83%) compared to RARC (51.78%) (<i>P</i> = 0.03). Mean lymph node yield was highest in RARC (24.35 ± 3.06) versus Lap RC (22 ± 2.87) and ORC (19.47 ± 3.56) (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.0001). Overall survival rate was 78.57% for RARC compared to 74.16% for ORC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that while RARC provides advantages in blood loss, complication rates, and mean lymph node yield, its longer operative time necessitates further optimization. The study highlights the importance of considering patient-specific factors and regional contexts in surgical approach decisions, with RARC showing promising results.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"17 3","pages":"179-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_98_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Radical cystectomy (RC) is the standard treatment for muscle-invasive and high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. The impact of minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) such as laparoscopic and robot-assisted RC (RARC) on outcomes and morbidity remains debated, especially in India. This study compares perioperative outcomes and complications of open RC (ORC), laparoscopic RC (LRC), and RARC.

Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study included 186 patients who underwent ORC, LRC, or RARC at our institution between October 2013 and April 2024. Preoperative parameters such as age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and chemotherapy status were recorded. Postoperative parameters including operative time, blood loss, return of bowel function, complications, and survival rates were analyzed. Pathological parameters such as stages, lymph node yield, and positive surgical margins were assessed.

Results: The study included 120 ORC, 56 RARC, and 10 LRC patients. The median age was highest in the laparoscopic group (67.4 ± 6.33 years) with a higher BMI (26.22 ± 5.24). Operative time was longest for RARC (414 ± 115.7 min) versus 357.96 ± 60.08 for ORC (P ≤ 0.0001), but blood loss was lowest (413.39 ± 165.55 ml) versus 518.33 ± 171.49 for ORC (P = 0.0001). Return of bowel function was fastest in the RARC group (4.27 + 2.79 days). Complications were highest in the ORC group (70.83%) compared to RARC (51.78%) (P = 0.03). Mean lymph node yield was highest in RARC (24.35 ± 3.06) versus Lap RC (22 ± 2.87) and ORC (19.47 ± 3.56) (P ≤ 0.0001). Overall survival rate was 78.57% for RARC compared to 74.16% for ORC.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that while RARC provides advantages in blood loss, complication rates, and mean lymph node yield, its longer operative time necessitates further optimization. The study highlights the importance of considering patient-specific factors and regional contexts in surgical approach decisions, with RARC showing promising results.

开放式根治性膀胱切除术、腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术围手术期疗效的比较研究。
导言:根治性膀胱切除术(Radical cystectomy, RC)是治疗肌肉侵袭性和高危非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌的标准方法。微创手术(MIS)如腹腔镜和机器人辅助手术(RARC)对结果和发病率的影响仍存在争议,特别是在印度。本研究比较了开放式RC (ORC)、腹腔镜RC (LRC)和RARC的围手术期结局和并发症。材料和方法:本前瞻性队列研究纳入了2013年10月至2024年4月期间在我院接受ORC、LRC或RARC治疗的186例患者。记录术前参数,如年龄、体重指数(BMI)、合并症和化疗情况。术后参数包括手术时间、出血量、肠功能恢复、并发症和生存率。评估病理参数,如分期、淋巴结肿大、阳性手术切缘。结果:该研究包括120例ORC, 56例RARC和10例LRC患者。腹腔镜组中位年龄最高(67.4±6.33岁),BMI较高(26.22±5.24)。RARC组手术时间最长(414±115.7 min), ORC组为357.96±60.08 min (P≤0.0001),出血量最少(413.39±165.55 ml), ORC组为518.33±171.49 ml (P = 0.0001)。RARC组肠道功能恢复最快(4.27 + 2.79天)。ORC组并发症发生率为70.83%,高于RARC组(51.78%)(P = 0.03)。RARC组平均淋巴结清扫率(24.35±3.06)高于Lap组(22±2.87)和ORC组(19.47±3.56)(P≤0.0001)。RARC的总生存率为78.57%,ORC为74.16%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,尽管RARC在失血量、并发症发生率和平均淋巴结率方面具有优势,但其较长的手术时间需要进一步优化。该研究强调了在决定手术入路时考虑患者特异性因素和区域背景的重要性,RARC显示了令人鼓舞的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信