Venoactive drug treatment for patients with pelvic varicose veins: Results of the single-center, randomized, open-label study (VENOTREAT).

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Sergey G Gavrilov, Yekaterina P Moskalenko, Anastasiya S Grishenkova, Sergei V Chubchenko
{"title":"Venoactive drug treatment for patients with pelvic varicose veins: Results of the single-center, randomized, open-label study (VENOTREAT).","authors":"Sergey G Gavrilov, Yekaterina P Moskalenko, Anastasiya S Grishenkova, Sergei V Chubchenko","doi":"10.1177/1358863X251362200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The efficacy of venoactive drug (VAD) treatment for pelvic venous disorder (PeVD) has not been fully investigated. This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of different diosmin-containing agents in women with PeVD. <b>Methods:</b> VENOTREAT was a single-center, randomized, open-label study included 150 women with symptomatic PeVD, who were allocated for the 2-month therapy a once-daily intake of: (1) micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) 1000 mg; (2) diosmin 600 mg, or (3) hesperidin and diosmin combination (HDC) 1000 mg. The effects on chronic pelvic pain (CPP), the time to pain relief, as well as adverse events (AEs) were investigated. <b>Results:</b> Patients receiving MPFF reported a CPP reduction, using visual analog scale (VAS) scores, from 5.7 ± 0.8 to 2.8 ± 0.4 (<i>p</i> = 0.001) by day 7 and its elimination by day 28 in all cases. In the diosmin and HDC groups, the CPP reduction became significant by day 14 (VAS scores from 5.3 ± 0.6 to 3.7 ± 0.3 and from 5.1 ± 0.3 to 3.5 ± 0.2, respectively, both <i>p</i> = 0.001), and pain was eliminated after 2 months in 37 and 35, and decreased in the remaining 13 and 15 patients to VAS scores 1.07 ± 0.2 and 1.1 ± 0.07, accordingly. AEs included headache, nausea, gastralgia, and diarrhea and were reported in 7.3% of cases in general and in 6%, 8%, and 8% of patients in the MPFF, diosmin, and HDC groups, respectively. No serious AEs were observed. <b>Conclusion:</b> VAD treatment is effective and safe for eliminating CPP in PeVD. MPFF provides a faster and greater effect on venous CPP of venous origin. <b>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06584799.</b></p>","PeriodicalId":23604,"journal":{"name":"Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1358863X251362200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251362200","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of venoactive drug (VAD) treatment for pelvic venous disorder (PeVD) has not been fully investigated. This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of different diosmin-containing agents in women with PeVD. Methods: VENOTREAT was a single-center, randomized, open-label study included 150 women with symptomatic PeVD, who were allocated for the 2-month therapy a once-daily intake of: (1) micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) 1000 mg; (2) diosmin 600 mg, or (3) hesperidin and diosmin combination (HDC) 1000 mg. The effects on chronic pelvic pain (CPP), the time to pain relief, as well as adverse events (AEs) were investigated. Results: Patients receiving MPFF reported a CPP reduction, using visual analog scale (VAS) scores, from 5.7 ± 0.8 to 2.8 ± 0.4 (p = 0.001) by day 7 and its elimination by day 28 in all cases. In the diosmin and HDC groups, the CPP reduction became significant by day 14 (VAS scores from 5.3 ± 0.6 to 3.7 ± 0.3 and from 5.1 ± 0.3 to 3.5 ± 0.2, respectively, both p = 0.001), and pain was eliminated after 2 months in 37 and 35, and decreased in the remaining 13 and 15 patients to VAS scores 1.07 ± 0.2 and 1.1 ± 0.07, accordingly. AEs included headache, nausea, gastralgia, and diarrhea and were reported in 7.3% of cases in general and in 6%, 8%, and 8% of patients in the MPFF, diosmin, and HDC groups, respectively. No serious AEs were observed. Conclusion: VAD treatment is effective and safe for eliminating CPP in PeVD. MPFF provides a faster and greater effect on venous CPP of venous origin. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06584799.

盆腔静脉曲张患者的静脉活性药物治疗:单中心、随机、开放标签研究(VENOTREAT)的结果
背景:静脉活性药物(VAD)治疗盆腔静脉疾病(PeVD)的疗效尚未得到充分的研究。本研究旨在评价不同含薯蓣皂苷制剂对女性PeVD的疗效和安全性。方法:VENOTREAT是一项单中心、随机、开放标签的研究,纳入了150名有症状的PeVD女性,她们被分配进行为期2个月的治疗,每天一次摄入:(1)微量纯化类黄酮提取物(MPFF) 1000 mg;(2)薯蓣皂苷600毫克,或(3)橙皮苷和薯蓣皂苷组合(HDC) 1000毫克。观察对慢性盆腔疼痛(CPP)、疼痛缓解时间及不良事件(ae)的影响。结果:使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,所有接受MPFF的患者在第7天CPP从5.7±0.8下降到2.8±0.4 (p = 0.001),并在第28天消除CPP。在地奥司明组和HDC组中,CPP在第14天显著降低(VAS评分分别从5.3±0.6降至3.7±0.3和从5.1±0.3降至3.5±0.2,p均= 0.001),第37和35例患者在2个月后疼痛消失,其余13和15例患者的VAS评分分别降低至1.07±0.2和1.1±0.07。不良反应包括头痛、恶心、胃痛和腹泻,一般情况下有7.3%的病例报告发生不良反应,MPFF、地奥司明和HDC组分别有6%、8%和8%的患者报告发生不良反应。未见严重不良反应。结论:VAD治疗可有效、安全地消除PeVD患者的CPP。MPFF对静脉源性CPP有更快更大的疗效。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06584799。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular Medicine
Vascular Medicine 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The premier, ISI-ranked journal of vascular medicine. Integrates the latest research in vascular biology with advancements for the practice of vascular medicine and vascular surgery. It features original research and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for vascular disease. A member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信