It is not all anti-policy attitudes: Viewing blood donation as a means to belong predicts blood donation among men who have sex with men.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-24 DOI:10.1111/tme.70012
Koson Tony Sriamporn, Peter J W Saxton, Nathan S Consedine
{"title":"It is not all anti-policy attitudes: Viewing blood donation as a means to belong predicts blood donation among men who have sex with men.","authors":"Koson Tony Sriamporn, Peter J W Saxton, Nathan S Consedine","doi":"10.1111/tme.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether specific attitudes towards blood donation vary across MSM demographic groups; and preliminarily test whether these attitudes predict prior donation behaviour.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Insights into blood donors' attitudes facilitate effective donor management, especially as policies for men who have sex with men (MSM) become more inclusive. While attitudes towards donating blood can predict donor decisions, it is unclear whether attitudinal factors specific to MSM groups will be important considerations for blood service providers engaging with this newly eligible donor group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were drawn from a large (N = 3157) online cross-sectional survey of MSM in New Zealand. New items were developed to assess three attitudinal constructs: negative attitudes towards the MSM deferral policy, favourable attitudes towards blood services, and the tendency to view blood donation as a form of civic participation and belonging. Univariate analyses descriptively characterised demographic factors associated with those various attitudes, and multivariate logistic regressions were used to predict self-reported donation histories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Negative views of deferral policies and blood services varied across sample characteristics in univariate analyses, but did not systematically differ between donors and nondonors. However, a perception of blood donation as a means of civic belonging was consistently associated with greater donation, including 1.46 times the odds of having ever donated (p < 0.001) and 1.40 times the odds of having donated recently under the current 3-month deferral policy (p = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of recognising broader civic-related attitudes in MSM donor research and engagement strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"424-436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.70012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether specific attitudes towards blood donation vary across MSM demographic groups; and preliminarily test whether these attitudes predict prior donation behaviour.

Background: Insights into blood donors' attitudes facilitate effective donor management, especially as policies for men who have sex with men (MSM) become more inclusive. While attitudes towards donating blood can predict donor decisions, it is unclear whether attitudinal factors specific to MSM groups will be important considerations for blood service providers engaging with this newly eligible donor group.

Methods: Data were drawn from a large (N = 3157) online cross-sectional survey of MSM in New Zealand. New items were developed to assess three attitudinal constructs: negative attitudes towards the MSM deferral policy, favourable attitudes towards blood services, and the tendency to view blood donation as a form of civic participation and belonging. Univariate analyses descriptively characterised demographic factors associated with those various attitudes, and multivariate logistic regressions were used to predict self-reported donation histories.

Results: Negative views of deferral policies and blood services varied across sample characteristics in univariate analyses, but did not systematically differ between donors and nondonors. However, a perception of blood donation as a means of civic belonging was consistently associated with greater donation, including 1.46 times the odds of having ever donated (p < 0.001) and 1.40 times the odds of having donated recently under the current 3-month deferral policy (p = 0.017).

Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of recognising broader civic-related attitudes in MSM donor research and engagement strategies.

并非所有人都持反对政策的态度:将献血视为归属的一种手段,预示着男男性行为者也会献血。
目的:探讨不同男男性接触人群对献血的具体态度是否存在差异;并初步测试这些态度是否能预测之前的捐赠行为。背景:了解献血者的态度有助于有效的献血者管理,特别是随着针对男男性行为者(MSM)的政策变得更加包容。虽然对献血的态度可以预测献血者的决定,但目前尚不清楚MSM群体特有的态度因素是否会成为血液服务提供者与这一新的合格献血者群体接触的重要考虑因素。方法:数据来自新西兰MSM在线横断面调查(N = 3157)。开发了新的项目来评估三种态度结构:对男男性接触者推迟政策的消极态度,对血液服务的有利态度,以及将献血视为公民参与和归属的一种形式的倾向。单变量分析描述性地描述了与这些不同态度相关的人口因素,并使用多变量逻辑回归来预测自我报告的捐赠历史。结果:在单变量分析中,对延迟政策和血液服务的负面看法因样本特征而异,但在献血者和非献血者之间没有系统性差异。然而,将献血作为公民归属感的一种方式的看法始终与更多的献血相关,包括曾经献血的几率的1.46倍(p结论:这些发现强调了在MSM献血者研究和参与策略中认识到更广泛的公民相关态度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine
Transfusion Medicine 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology. In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信