Validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (spectro-DPRA), a newly modified in chemico skin sensitization test method.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Toxicological Research Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s43188-025-00287-y
Hye-Jeong Sin, Ji-Young Bae, Sun-A Cho, Minseok Choi, Changwan Ha, Chang Eon Park, Jeong-Ja Oh, Susun An, Bae-Hwan Kim
{"title":"Validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (spectro-DPRA), a newly modified in chemico skin sensitization test method.","authors":"Hye-Jeong Sin, Ji-Young Bae, Sun-A Cho, Minseok Choi, Changwan Ha, Chang Eon Park, Jeong-Ja Oh, Susun An, Bae-Hwan Kim","doi":"10.1007/s43188-025-00287-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Spectro-DPRA, an enhanced method for the OECD TG 442C (direct peptide reactivity assay, DPRA), serving as an alternative to animal testing for skin sensitization. The validation of Spectro-DPRA was executed across four participating laboratories (Lab 1, Lab 2, Lab 3, and Lab 4, the latter only participating in the proficiency test) adhering to GLP principles. It covered transferability, proficiency, within laboratory and between laboratory reproducibility tests, and a predictive capacity test using 40 additional substances. In tests with 10 proficiency substances, results from all participating laboratories fell within the respective reference ranges for 8 of the 10 substances for each peptide. The within laboratory reproducibility for 12 test substances demonstrated success rates of 83.3% for both Lab 1 and Lab 3, and 100% for Lab 2. The between laboratory reproducibility for 20 test substances showed an 85% concordance rate. The predictive capacity for these substances did not align with the test method similarity criteria stipulated in the OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 303 (performance standards for the assessment of proposed similar or modified in vitro skin sensitisation DPRA and ADRA test methods, OECD PS No.303), with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates at 74.6%, 70.9%, and 81.4%, respectively. However, the predictive capacity for an additional 40 substances revealed high accuracy (85.2%), sensitivity (82.2%), and specificity (97.0%). Although the Spectro-DPRA did not completely conform to the OECD PS No.303 criteria for test method similarity, it showed high predictive accuracy of over 80% for the 40 additional substances, confirming its reliability as a test method for skin sensitization evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23181,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Research","volume":"41 5","pages":"455-475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-025-00287-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Spectro-DPRA, an enhanced method for the OECD TG 442C (direct peptide reactivity assay, DPRA), serving as an alternative to animal testing for skin sensitization. The validation of Spectro-DPRA was executed across four participating laboratories (Lab 1, Lab 2, Lab 3, and Lab 4, the latter only participating in the proficiency test) adhering to GLP principles. It covered transferability, proficiency, within laboratory and between laboratory reproducibility tests, and a predictive capacity test using 40 additional substances. In tests with 10 proficiency substances, results from all participating laboratories fell within the respective reference ranges for 8 of the 10 substances for each peptide. The within laboratory reproducibility for 12 test substances demonstrated success rates of 83.3% for both Lab 1 and Lab 3, and 100% for Lab 2. The between laboratory reproducibility for 20 test substances showed an 85% concordance rate. The predictive capacity for these substances did not align with the test method similarity criteria stipulated in the OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 303 (performance standards for the assessment of proposed similar or modified in vitro skin sensitisation DPRA and ADRA test methods, OECD PS No.303), with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates at 74.6%, 70.9%, and 81.4%, respectively. However, the predictive capacity for an additional 40 substances revealed high accuracy (85.2%), sensitivity (82.2%), and specificity (97.0%). Although the Spectro-DPRA did not completely conform to the OECD PS No.303 criteria for test method similarity, it showed high predictive accuracy of over 80% for the 40 additional substances, confirming its reliability as a test method for skin sensitization evaluation.

一种新改进的化学皮肤致敏试验方法——分光光度法直接肽反应性测定法的验证研究。
本研究旨在评估Spectro-DPRA的准确性和可靠性,这是OECD TG 442C(直接肽反应性测定,DPRA)的一种增强方法,可作为皮肤致敏性动物试验的替代方法。Spectro-DPRA的验证在四个参与的实验室(实验室1、实验室2、实验室3和实验室4,后者只参与能力测试)中执行,遵循GLP原则。它包括可转移性、熟练程度、实验室内部和实验室之间的重复性测试,以及使用40种其他物质的预测能力测试。在10种熟练度物质的测试中,所有参与实验室的结果均落在每种肽的10种物质中的8种各自的参考范围内。实验室内12种测试物质的重复性表明,实验室1和实验室3的成功率为83.3%,实验室2的成功率为100%。20种试验物质的实验室重复性显示85%的一致性。这些物质的预测能力不符合OECD系列测试和评估第303号(评估提议的类似或修改的体外皮肤致敏DPRA和ADRA测试方法的性能标准,OECD PS No.303)中规定的测试方法相似性标准,准确性、灵敏度和特异性分别为74.6%、70.9%和81.4%。然而,对另外40种物质的预测能力显示出较高的准确性(85.2%)、敏感性(82.2%)和特异性(97.0%)。虽然Spectro-DPRA不完全符合OECD PS No.303测试方法相似性标准,但它对40种附加物质的预测准确度超过80%,证实了其作为皮肤致敏性评估测试方法的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Toxicological Research is the official journal of the Korean Society of Toxicology. The journal covers all areas of Toxicological Research of chemicals, drugs and environmental agents affecting human and animals, which in turn impact public health. The journal’s mission is to disseminate scientific and technical information on diverse areas of toxicological research. Contributions by toxicologists, molecular biologists, geneticists, biochemists, pharmacologists, clinical researchers and epidemiologists with a global view on public health through toxicological research are welcome. Emphasis will be given to articles providing an understanding of the toxicological mechanisms affecting animal, human and public health. In the case of research articles using natural extracts, detailed information with respect to the origin, extraction method, chemical profiles, and characterization of standard compounds to ensure the reproducible pharmacological activity should be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信