Using deep learning to predict internalizing problems from brain structure in youth.

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Marlee M Vandewouw, Bilal Syed, Noah Barnett, Alfredo Arias, Elizabeth Kelley, Jessica Jones, Muhammad Ayub, Alana Iaboni, Paul D Arnold, Jennifer Crosbie, Russell J Schachar, Margot J Taylor, Jason P Lerch, Evdokia Anagnostou, Azadeh Kushki
{"title":"Using deep learning to predict internalizing problems from brain structure in youth.","authors":"Marlee M Vandewouw, Bilal Syed, Noah Barnett, Alfredo Arias, Elizabeth Kelley, Jessica Jones, Muhammad Ayub, Alana Iaboni, Paul D Arnold, Jennifer Crosbie, Russell J Schachar, Margot J Taylor, Jason P Lerch, Evdokia Anagnostou, Azadeh Kushki","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03565-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internalizing problems (e.g., anxiety and depression) are associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes. While some predictors of internalizing problems are known (e.g., their frequent co-occurrence with neurodevelopmental (ND) conditions), the biological markers of internalizing problems are not well understood. Here, we used deep learning, a powerful tool for identifying complex and multi-dimensional brain-behaviour relationships, to predict cross-sectional and worsening longitudinal trajectories of internalizing problems. Data were extracted from four large-scale datasets: the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, the Healthy Brain Network, the Human Connectome Project Development study, and the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental network. We developed deep learning models that used measures of brain structure (thickness, surface area, and volume) to (a) predict clinically significant internalizing problems cross-sectionally (N = 14,523); and (b) predict subsequent worsening trajectories (using the reliable change index) of internalizing problems (N = 10,540) longitudinally. A stratified cross-validation scheme was used to tune, train, and test the models, which were evaluated using the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC). The cross-sectional model performed well across the sample, reaching an AUC of 0.80 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.88]. For the longitudinal model, while performance was sub-optimal for predicting worsening trajectories in a sample of the general population (AUC = 0.66 [0.65, 0.67]), good performance was achieved in a small, external test set of primarily ND conditions (AUC = 0.80 [0.78, 0.81]), as well as across all ND conditions (AUC = 0.73 [0.70, 0.76]). Deep learning with features of brain structure is a promising avenue for biomarkers of internalizing problems, particularly for individuals who have a higher likelihood of experiencing difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"326"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12397277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03565-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internalizing problems (e.g., anxiety and depression) are associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes. While some predictors of internalizing problems are known (e.g., their frequent co-occurrence with neurodevelopmental (ND) conditions), the biological markers of internalizing problems are not well understood. Here, we used deep learning, a powerful tool for identifying complex and multi-dimensional brain-behaviour relationships, to predict cross-sectional and worsening longitudinal trajectories of internalizing problems. Data were extracted from four large-scale datasets: the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, the Healthy Brain Network, the Human Connectome Project Development study, and the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental network. We developed deep learning models that used measures of brain structure (thickness, surface area, and volume) to (a) predict clinically significant internalizing problems cross-sectionally (N = 14,523); and (b) predict subsequent worsening trajectories (using the reliable change index) of internalizing problems (N = 10,540) longitudinally. A stratified cross-validation scheme was used to tune, train, and test the models, which were evaluated using the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC). The cross-sectional model performed well across the sample, reaching an AUC of 0.80 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.88]. For the longitudinal model, while performance was sub-optimal for predicting worsening trajectories in a sample of the general population (AUC = 0.66 [0.65, 0.67]), good performance was achieved in a small, external test set of primarily ND conditions (AUC = 0.80 [0.78, 0.81]), as well as across all ND conditions (AUC = 0.73 [0.70, 0.76]). Deep learning with features of brain structure is a promising avenue for biomarkers of internalizing problems, particularly for individuals who have a higher likelihood of experiencing difficulties.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用深度学习来预测青少年大脑结构的内化问题。
内化问题(如焦虑和抑郁)与一系列不良后果有关。虽然内化问题的一些预测因素是已知的(例如,它们经常与神经发育(ND)条件共同发生),但内化问题的生物学标记尚未得到很好的理解。在这里,我们使用深度学习(一种识别复杂和多维大脑行为关系的强大工具)来预测内化问题的横截面和恶化的纵向轨迹。数据来自四个大型数据集:青少年大脑认知发展研究、健康大脑网络、人类连接体项目发展研究和安大略省神经发育网络。我们开发了深度学习模型,使用大脑结构(厚度、表面积和体积)的测量来(a)横断面预测临床显著的内化问题(N = 14,523);(b)纵向预测内化问题(N = 10,540)的后续恶化轨迹(使用可靠的变化指数)。采用分层交叉验证方案对模型进行调整、训练和测试,并使用接收工作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积对模型进行评估。横截面模型在整个样本中表现良好,AUC达到0.80 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.88]。对于纵向模型,虽然在一般人群样本中预测恶化轨迹的性能不是最优的(AUC = 0.66[0.65, 0.67]),但在主要ND条件的小型外部测试集(AUC = 0.80[0.78, 0.81])以及所有ND条件(AUC = 0.73[0.70, 0.76])中取得了良好的性能。具有大脑结构特征的深度学习是内化问题生物标志物的一个有希望的途径,特别是对于那些更有可能遇到困难的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信