Are Post-Care Recommendations Following Upper-Face Botulinum Toxin Treatment Scientifically Necessary? A Retrospective Study Based on 5000 Patients.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Toxins Pub Date : 2025-07-28 DOI:10.3390/toxins17080372
Adriano Santorelli, Giovanni Salti, Maurizio Cavallini, Salvatore Piero Fundarò, Matteo Basso, Martina Ponzo, Stefano Avvedimento, Stefano Uderzo
{"title":"Are Post-Care Recommendations Following Upper-Face Botulinum Toxin Treatment Scientifically Necessary? A Retrospective Study Based on 5000 Patients.","authors":"Adriano Santorelli, Giovanni Salti, Maurizio Cavallini, Salvatore Piero Fundarò, Matteo Basso, Martina Ponzo, Stefano Avvedimento, Stefano Uderzo","doi":"10.3390/toxins17080372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient care following botulinum toxin injections has long been guided by anecdotal instructions, often based on theoretical considerations. This study evaluates the necessity of extended post-treatment instructions by analyzing outcomes and satisfaction in patients who followed only a 10 min precaution protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective, multicentric study was conducted across six Italian centers, analyzing 5014 patients treated with botulinum toxin for upper facial wrinkles between 2015 and 2020. Outcomes included adverse effects-particularly upper eyelid ptosis-and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed at two weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No cases of upper eyelid ptosis were observed. Among 4000 patients who attended follow-up, adverse effects occurred in only 5.99%, notably lower than rates reported in the literature. Of the 2010 patients who completed the satisfaction questionnaire, 90% reported being very satisfied. These findings support the safety of limiting post-treatment instructions to 10 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that omitting extended post-injection instructions does not negatively impact patient satisfaction or complication rates. Given the toxin's rapid internalization and localized effect, extended behavioral restrictions may be redundant. However, the absence of a control group and lack of statistical analyses limit the strength of these conclusions. In addition, this is a short-term study. Future prospective, randomized trials are needed to develop evidence-based post-care protocols to optimize esthetic outcomes, patient safety, and long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23119,"journal":{"name":"Toxins","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12390119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxins","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17080372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient care following botulinum toxin injections has long been guided by anecdotal instructions, often based on theoretical considerations. This study evaluates the necessity of extended post-treatment instructions by analyzing outcomes and satisfaction in patients who followed only a 10 min precaution protocol.

Materials and methods: A retrospective, multicentric study was conducted across six Italian centers, analyzing 5014 patients treated with botulinum toxin for upper facial wrinkles between 2015 and 2020. Outcomes included adverse effects-particularly upper eyelid ptosis-and patient satisfaction. Follow-up was performed at two weeks.

Results: No cases of upper eyelid ptosis were observed. Among 4000 patients who attended follow-up, adverse effects occurred in only 5.99%, notably lower than rates reported in the literature. Of the 2010 patients who completed the satisfaction questionnaire, 90% reported being very satisfied. These findings support the safety of limiting post-treatment instructions to 10 min.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that omitting extended post-injection instructions does not negatively impact patient satisfaction or complication rates. Given the toxin's rapid internalization and localized effect, extended behavioral restrictions may be redundant. However, the absence of a control group and lack of statistical analyses limit the strength of these conclusions. In addition, this is a short-term study. Future prospective, randomized trials are needed to develop evidence-based post-care protocols to optimize esthetic outcomes, patient safety, and long-term efficacy.

上面部肉毒杆菌毒素治疗后的护理建议是否科学必要?基于5000例患者的回顾性研究。
背景:长期以来,肉毒杆菌毒素注射后的患者护理一直以轶事指示为指导,通常基于理论考虑。本研究通过分析仅遵循10分钟预防方案的患者的结果和满意度来评估延长治疗后指导的必要性。材料和方法:在意大利6个中心进行了一项回顾性多中心研究,分析了2015年至2020年期间5014名接受肉毒杆菌毒素治疗的上面部皱纹患者。结果包括不良反应——尤其是上眼睑下垂——和患者满意度。两周后进行随访。结果:无上睑下垂病例。在随访的4000例患者中,不良反应发生率仅为5.99%,明显低于文献报道的发生率。在完成满意度问卷的2010名患者中,90%的患者表示非常满意。这些发现支持将治疗后指导时间限制在10分钟的安全性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,省略延长的注射后指示不会对患者满意度或并发症发生率产生负面影响。鉴于毒素的快速内化和局部效应,延长的行为限制可能是多余的。然而,缺乏对照组和缺乏统计分析限制了这些结论的强度。此外,这是一项短期研究。未来需要前瞻性的随机试验来制定循证的护理后方案,以优化美容结果、患者安全性和长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxins
Toxins TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
765
审稿时长
16.24 days
期刊介绍: Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to toxins and toxinology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信