{"title":"Impact of cycling exercise in patients with chronic kidney disease: protocol for a systematic review and trial sequential meta-analysis.","authors":"Chen Chen, Shao-Hua Chen, Yan Cao, Ji-Ming Tao","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02932-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease is a global public health problem affecting approximately 10% of the adult population. Conventional management combines pharmacotherapy and dialysis, yet long-term complications persist. Cycling, a low joint load exercise, may improve cardiopulmonary function and renal outcomes, but conflicting evidence exists regarding its efficacy in advanced CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare cycling exercise and usual care in patients with chronic kidney disease will be included. Literature searches will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently perform the processes of literature retrieval, screening, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias. Risk of bias in included studies will be evaluated using Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) for RCTs. Review Manager (RevMan) will be used for data pooling. Subgroup analysis, trial sequential analysis (TSA), and sensitivity analysis will be conducted.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>Ethical approval is not required because this study is a secondary analysis of existing data. We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420251048364.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"170"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02932-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Chronic kidney disease is a global public health problem affecting approximately 10% of the adult population. Conventional management combines pharmacotherapy and dialysis, yet long-term complications persist. Cycling, a low joint load exercise, may improve cardiopulmonary function and renal outcomes, but conflicting evidence exists regarding its efficacy in advanced CKD.
Methods and analysis: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare cycling exercise and usual care in patients with chronic kidney disease will be included. Literature searches will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers will independently perform the processes of literature retrieval, screening, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias. Risk of bias in included studies will be evaluated using Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB 2) for RCTs. Review Manager (RevMan) will be used for data pooling. Subgroup analysis, trial sequential analysis (TSA), and sensitivity analysis will be conducted.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required because this study is a secondary analysis of existing data. We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.