Using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify strategies to support the implementation of the guidelines for the physiotherapy management of people with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study.

IF 0.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
K E Tranter, L A Harvey, J Chu, J Ilha, M Ben, L W Chen, J V Glinsky
{"title":"Using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify strategies to support the implementation of the guidelines for the physiotherapy management of people with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study.","authors":"K E Tranter, L A Harvey, J Chu, J Ilha, M Ben, L W Chen, J V Glinsky","doi":"10.1038/s41394-025-00719-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative design.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to (i) determine the perspectives of therapists and people with spinal cord injury (SCI) on our recently developed Australian and New Zealand Clinical Practice Guidelines for the physiotherapy management of people with SCI, and (ii) understand the barriers and facilitators to the rollout of the Guidelines and identify implementation strategies to support their uptake.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital and community SCI services, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one therapists and 10 people with SCI were interviewed one-on-one or within focus groups. The interviews captured perspectives of therapists and people with SCI on the Guidelines as well as barriers and facilitators to the rollout of the Guidelines. The interviews with therapists were guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). All interviews were transcribed and thematically coded. Barriers and facilitators were then linked to the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour) to identify implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The barriers to implementation of the Guidelines identified by therapists were lack of knowledge and skill, lack of resources and challenges associated with working within large organisations. Facilitators to the uptake of the Guidelines were providing education, skill training, Guideline champions, awareness, and two-way communication between patient and therapist. Fourteen implementation strategies were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both therapists and people with SCI thought the Guidelines were a useful tool to improve the quality of care provided to people with SCI across various health settings. Facilitators identified in this study are being used to guide current implementation projects to enhance the uptake of the Guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":22079,"journal":{"name":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","volume":"11 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal Cord Series and Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-025-00719-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Qualitative design.

Aim: The aim of the study was to (i) determine the perspectives of therapists and people with spinal cord injury (SCI) on our recently developed Australian and New Zealand Clinical Practice Guidelines for the physiotherapy management of people with SCI, and (ii) understand the barriers and facilitators to the rollout of the Guidelines and identify implementation strategies to support their uptake.

Setting: Hospital and community SCI services, Australia.

Methods: Twenty-one therapists and 10 people with SCI were interviewed one-on-one or within focus groups. The interviews captured perspectives of therapists and people with SCI on the Guidelines as well as barriers and facilitators to the rollout of the Guidelines. The interviews with therapists were guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). All interviews were transcribed and thematically coded. Barriers and facilitators were then linked to the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour) to identify implementation strategies.

Results: The barriers to implementation of the Guidelines identified by therapists were lack of knowledge and skill, lack of resources and challenges associated with working within large organisations. Facilitators to the uptake of the Guidelines were providing education, skill training, Guideline champions, awareness, and two-way communication between patient and therapist. Fourteen implementation strategies were identified.

Conclusion: Both therapists and people with SCI thought the Guidelines were a useful tool to improve the quality of care provided to people with SCI across various health settings. Facilitators identified in this study are being used to guide current implementation projects to enhance the uptake of the Guidelines.

使用理论领域框架来确定策略,以支持脊髓损伤患者物理治疗管理指南的实施:一项定性研究。
研究设计:定性设计。目的:该研究的目的是(i)确定治疗师和脊髓损伤(SCI)患者对我们最近制定的澳大利亚和新西兰脊髓损伤患者物理治疗管理临床实践指南的看法,以及(ii)了解指南推出的障碍和促进因素,并确定实施策略以支持其吸收。地点:澳大利亚医院和社区SCI服务。方法:对21名治疗师和10名脊髓损伤患者进行一对一或焦点小组访谈。访谈记录了治疗师和脊髓损伤患者对指南的看法,以及指南推出的障碍和促进因素。对治疗师的访谈以理论领域框架(TDF)为指导。所有的采访都被记录下来并按主题编码。然后将障碍和促进因素与COM-B模型(能力,机会,动机-行为)联系起来,以确定实施策略。结果:治疗师确定的实施指南的障碍是缺乏知识和技能,缺乏资源以及与在大型组织中工作相关的挑战。采纳指南的促进者提供教育、技能培训、指南拥护者、意识以及患者和治疗师之间的双向沟通。确定了14项执行战略。结论:治疗师和脊髓损伤患者都认为该指南是一个有用的工具,可以在各种医疗机构中提高对脊髓损伤患者的护理质量。正在利用本研究中确定的促进因素来指导当前的实施项目,以加强对《准则》的吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spinal Cord Series and Cases
Spinal Cord Series and Cases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信