{"title":"Surgical outcomes of completion lobectomy after primary segmentectomy.","authors":"Aritoshi Hattori, Takeshi Matsunaga, Mariko Fukui, Hisashi Tomita, Kazuya Takamochi, Kenji Suzuki","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03122-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We investigated the surgical outcomes of completion lobectomy after primary segmentectomy for lung malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A review of 1139 patients who underwent pulmonary segmentectomy for lung malignancies, identified 17 (1.5%) who underwent completion lobectomy. We analyzed the clinicopathological outcomes of completion lobectomy in these 17 patients, statistically, and evaluated the degree of surgical difficulty, using logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary segmentectomy was performed on the right-side in six patients, centrally in seven, in the upper lobe in nine, and as a complex segmentectomy in ten. Lung cancer was diagnosed in 13 patients. Completion lobectomy required an intrapericardial procedure in five patients, main pulmonary artery (PA) clamping in seven, bronchial plasty in five, and PA-plasty in five. The mean operative time was 219 min, and the mean blood loss was 193 ml. Cut-end recurrence was confirmed in nine (56%) patients, and Grade III or higher morbidity occurred in six patients (38%) with no short-term mortality. Logistic regression analysis revealed that upper lobe completion lobectomy was a significant predictor of surgical difficulty (OR 23.8, 95%CI 1.742-333.3, p = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Completion lobectomy is technically challenging, especially in the upper lobe, but the oncological and surgical results are acceptable. This procedure is a promising and important strategy for treating secondary lesions in the residual lobe after segmentectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03122-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: We investigated the surgical outcomes of completion lobectomy after primary segmentectomy for lung malignancies.
Methods: A review of 1139 patients who underwent pulmonary segmentectomy for lung malignancies, identified 17 (1.5%) who underwent completion lobectomy. We analyzed the clinicopathological outcomes of completion lobectomy in these 17 patients, statistically, and evaluated the degree of surgical difficulty, using logistic regression models.
Results: The primary segmentectomy was performed on the right-side in six patients, centrally in seven, in the upper lobe in nine, and as a complex segmentectomy in ten. Lung cancer was diagnosed in 13 patients. Completion lobectomy required an intrapericardial procedure in five patients, main pulmonary artery (PA) clamping in seven, bronchial plasty in five, and PA-plasty in five. The mean operative time was 219 min, and the mean blood loss was 193 ml. Cut-end recurrence was confirmed in nine (56%) patients, and Grade III or higher morbidity occurred in six patients (38%) with no short-term mortality. Logistic regression analysis revealed that upper lobe completion lobectomy was a significant predictor of surgical difficulty (OR 23.8, 95%CI 1.742-333.3, p = 0.018).
Conclusion: Completion lobectomy is technically challenging, especially in the upper lobe, but the oncological and surgical results are acceptable. This procedure is a promising and important strategy for treating secondary lesions in the residual lobe after segmentectomy.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.