The advantages and limitations of animal models for understanding acute neonatal brain injury.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kelly Q Zhou, Raymand Pang, Nicola J Robertson, Justin M Dean, Laura Bennet, Joanne O Davidson, Alistair J Gunn
{"title":"The advantages and limitations of animal models for understanding acute neonatal brain injury.","authors":"Kelly Q Zhou, Raymand Pang, Nicola J Robertson, Justin M Dean, Laura Bennet, Joanne O Davidson, Alistair J Gunn","doi":"10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) remains a major cause of death and disability around the world. Therapeutic hypothermia is now established to improve outcomes in term and near-term infants in high-income countries, but even in this setting, many infants still survive with disability. To further improve outcomes, experimental models are needed to test new interventions before clinical translation. In the present review, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of a range of near-term and term models and their utility for understanding the pathophysiology of HIE and to test potential treatments. It is important to reflect that the strength of the evidence base for therapeutic hypothermia before it went to trial was that multiple groups using different and complementary models all showed benefit and that these models had been used to define the key parameters needed to achieve neuroprotection. We strongly advocate that this should be the expectation for all new neuroprotective interventions before large pragmatic randomized controlled trials are carried out.</p>","PeriodicalId":21761,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"152129"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) remains a major cause of death and disability around the world. Therapeutic hypothermia is now established to improve outcomes in term and near-term infants in high-income countries, but even in this setting, many infants still survive with disability. To further improve outcomes, experimental models are needed to test new interventions before clinical translation. In the present review, we discuss the strengths and weaknesses of a range of near-term and term models and their utility for understanding the pathophysiology of HIE and to test potential treatments. It is important to reflect that the strength of the evidence base for therapeutic hypothermia before it went to trial was that multiple groups using different and complementary models all showed benefit and that these models had been used to define the key parameters needed to achieve neuroprotection. We strongly advocate that this should be the expectation for all new neuroprotective interventions before large pragmatic randomized controlled trials are carried out.

动物模型用于理解急性新生儿脑损伤的优势和局限性。
新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)仍然是世界各地死亡和残疾的主要原因。在高收入国家,治疗性低温疗法现已被用于改善足月婴儿和近期婴儿的预后,但即使在这种情况下,许多婴儿仍然存在残疾。为了进一步改善结果,在临床转化之前,需要实验模型来测试新的干预措施。在本综述中,我们讨论了一系列近期和长期模型的优缺点,以及它们在理解HIE病理生理学和测试潜在治疗方法方面的应用。重要的是要反映出,在进行试验之前,治疗性低温的证据基础的强度是,使用不同和互补模型的多个组都显示出益处,并且这些模型已用于定义实现神经保护所需的关键参数。我们强烈主张,在进行大规模实用的随机对照试验之前,这应该是对所有新的神经保护干预措施的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in perinatology
Seminars in perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of each issue of Seminars in Perinatology is to provide authoritative and comprehensive reviews of a single topic of interest to professionals who care for the mother, the fetus, and the newborn. The journal''s readership includes perinatologists, obstetricians, pediatricians, epidemiologists, students in these fields, and others. Each issue offers a comprehensive review of an individual topic, with emphasis on new developments that will have a direct impact on their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信