Prognostic difference of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on tumor differentiation: a single center retrospective study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Masato Hayashi, Makoto Abe, Takeshi Fujita, Hisayuki Matsushita
{"title":"Prognostic difference of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on tumor differentiation: a single center retrospective study.","authors":"Masato Hayashi, Makoto Abe, Takeshi Fujita, Hisayuki Matsushita","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2025.2548604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumor differentiation is recognized as a prognostic predictor in certain malignancies such as gastric cancer. Although some studies have indicated a prognostic role for tumor differentiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), that is not widely known. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively investigated the prognostic value of tumor differentiation in ESCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigated the prognostic value of tumor differentiation by using data from patients who underwent radical esophagectomy for ESCC. The characteristics of patients with well differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated ESCCs were investigated and compared Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 226 ESCC patients. The frequencies of each ESCC type were as follows: well-differentiated ESCC, 49 cases (21.7%); moderately differentiated ESCC, 149 cases (65.9%); and poorly differentiated ESCC, 28 cases (12.4%). Although Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistical significance for overall survival (OS) or recurrence (<i>p</i> = 0.083 and <i>p</i> = 0.36, respectively), Cox regression analysis demonstrated that tumor differentiation, particularly poorly differentiated ESCC, was a statistically significant factor for survival both in univariable and multivariable analyses (<i>p</i> = 0.03 and <i>p</i> < 0.01, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that tumor differentiation in ESCC may be a useful predictor of survival. However, owing to the small sample size, especially in patients who received preoperative treatment, further studies are required to establish definitive evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"983-991"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2025.2548604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tumor differentiation is recognized as a prognostic predictor in certain malignancies such as gastric cancer. Although some studies have indicated a prognostic role for tumor differentiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), that is not widely known. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively investigated the prognostic value of tumor differentiation in ESCC.

Methods: This study investigated the prognostic value of tumor differentiation by using data from patients who underwent radical esophagectomy for ESCC. The characteristics of patients with well differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated ESCCs were investigated and compared Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results: This study included 226 ESCC patients. The frequencies of each ESCC type were as follows: well-differentiated ESCC, 49 cases (21.7%); moderately differentiated ESCC, 149 cases (65.9%); and poorly differentiated ESCC, 28 cases (12.4%). Although Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistical significance for overall survival (OS) or recurrence (p = 0.083 and p = 0.36, respectively), Cox regression analysis demonstrated that tumor differentiation, particularly poorly differentiated ESCC, was a statistically significant factor for survival both in univariable and multivariable analyses (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that tumor differentiation in ESCC may be a useful predictor of survival. However, owing to the small sample size, especially in patients who received preoperative treatment, further studies are required to establish definitive evidence.

基于肿瘤分化的食管鳞状细胞癌预后差异:单中心回顾性研究。
背景:肿瘤分化被认为是某些恶性肿瘤(如胃癌)的预后预测因子。虽然一些研究表明肿瘤分化对食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的预后有影响,但这一点尚不为人所知。因此,在本研究中,我们回顾性研究了ESCC中肿瘤分化的预后价值。方法:本研究通过ESCC根治性食管切除术患者的数据来研究肿瘤分化的预后价值。研究并比较高分化、中分化和低分化escc患者的特征,采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险模型进行生存分析。结果:本研究纳入226例ESCC患者。各类型ESCC的发生率分别为:高分化ESCC 49例(21.7%);中分化ESCC 149例(65.9%);低分化ESCC 28例(12.4%)。尽管Kaplan-Meier分析显示总生存率(OS)和复发率无统计学意义(p = 0.083和p = 0.36),但Cox回归分析显示,肿瘤分化,特别是低分化ESCC,在单变量和多变量分析中都是具有统计学意义的生存因素(p = 0.03和p)。然而,由于样本量小,特别是在接受术前治疗的患者中,需要进一步的研究来建立明确的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信