The effect of centrality bias on triage nurses in the emergency department.

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121251364742
Dor Shlenger, Aya Cohen, Guy Hochman, Gal Pachys, Daniel Trotzky
{"title":"The effect of centrality bias on triage nurses in the emergency department.","authors":"Dor Shlenger, Aya Cohen, Guy Hochman, Gal Pachys, Daniel Trotzky","doi":"10.1177/20503121251364742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether centrality bias is one of the contributing factors for patient mistriage in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial was conducted in an emergency department triage station between April 1 and November 3, 2021. Experienced triage nurses were divided into control and treatment groups. The control group triaged patients using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale 1-5 triage scale, and the treatment group used a four-level triage scale (created by removing level 3 from the original Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale). Neither group was exposed to the other's ranking and the control group determined the patient's actual triage ranking. The accuracy of each group's ranking was determined by triage experts. Triage nurses' levels of confidence was investigated, as was the correlation between triage ranking accuracy and confidence level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After excluding 58 patients with missing data, 146 assessments were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare three different aspects of triage rankings between the nurses' groups and the control group. In the first and second analyses, accuracy levels of 49% and 68% (<i>p</i> = 0.003), 43% and 68% (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) were found for the control and experimental groups, respectively. The third aspect showed no significant differences. Within the control and experimental groups, the difference in accuracy rate at levels 2 and 5 was the most significant, with 13% and 75% (<i>p</i> = 0.40), 29% and 67% (<i>p</i> = 0.009), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Central tendency has the potential to affect the accuracy of ranking among triage nurses in the emergency department. Further research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"20503121251364742"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121251364742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether centrality bias is one of the contributing factors for patient mistriage in the emergency department.

Methods: A randomized, controlled, single-blinded trial was conducted in an emergency department triage station between April 1 and November 3, 2021. Experienced triage nurses were divided into control and treatment groups. The control group triaged patients using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale 1-5 triage scale, and the treatment group used a four-level triage scale (created by removing level 3 from the original Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale). Neither group was exposed to the other's ranking and the control group determined the patient's actual triage ranking. The accuracy of each group's ranking was determined by triage experts. Triage nurses' levels of confidence was investigated, as was the correlation between triage ranking accuracy and confidence level.

Results: After excluding 58 patients with missing data, 146 assessments were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed to compare three different aspects of triage rankings between the nurses' groups and the control group. In the first and second analyses, accuracy levels of 49% and 68% (p = 0.003), 43% and 68% (p < 0.0001) were found for the control and experimental groups, respectively. The third aspect showed no significant differences. Within the control and experimental groups, the difference in accuracy rate at levels 2 and 5 was the most significant, with 13% and 75% (p = 0.40), 29% and 67% (p = 0.009), respectively.

Conclusions: Central tendency has the potential to affect the accuracy of ranking among triage nurses in the emergency department. Further research is needed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

中心性偏倚对急诊科分诊护士的影响。
目的:探讨中心性偏倚是否是急诊科患者流产的影响因素之一。方法:于2021年4月1日至11月3日在某急诊科分诊站进行随机、对照、单盲试验。经验丰富的分诊护士分为对照组和治疗组。对照组使用加拿大分诊分类量表(Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale) 1-5分诊分类量表对患者进行分诊,治疗组使用4级分诊分类量表(通过从原来的加拿大分诊分类量表中删除3级而创建)。两组都不知道对方的排名,对照组决定了病人的实际分诊排名。每组排名的准确性由分诊专家决定。分诊护士的信心水平进行了调查,以及分诊排名准确性和信心水平之间的相关性。结果:在排除58例数据缺失的患者后,分析了146项评估。统计分析比较护理组和对照组在分诊排名的三个不同方面。在第一次和第二次分析中,准确率分别为49%和68% (p = 0.003), 43%和68% (p = 0.40), 29%和67% (p = 0.009)。结论:集中倾向有可能影响急诊科分诊护士排序的准确性。需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信