Chest CT imaging for differentiating normal, PRISm, and COPD in comparison with pulmonary function tests.

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zongjing Ma, Yingli Sun, Zhuangxuan Ma, Ling Zhang, Fanzhi Cheng, Haihong Ma, Liang Jin, Ming Li
{"title":"Chest CT imaging for differentiating normal, PRISm, and COPD in comparison with pulmonary function tests.","authors":"Zongjing Ma, Yingli Sun, Zhuangxuan Ma, Ling Zhang, Fanzhi Cheng, Haihong Ma, Liang Jin, Ming Li","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-02061-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are progressive respiratory disorders associated with accelerated pulmonary function decline and systemic comorbidities. This multicenter study aimed to develop a three-category classification model that integrates clinical variables with thoracic computed tomography (CT) radiomics to distinguish normal pulmonary function, PRISm, and COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1018 participants from three centers (A, B, C) who underwent chest CT and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) within a 2-week interval were retrospectively analyzed. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 797 individuals were included for analysis (Center A: 667 [training/internal test = 534:133]; Centers B, C: 130 external test). CT images were preprocessed via resampling and intensity normalization, followed by semi-automated segmentation of the airway tree and whole lung parenchyma using Mimics Research. PyRadiomics extracted 2436 radiomic features (1218 per region). Feature selection combined maximum relevance minimum redundancy with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, employing tenfold cross-validation. Five models were developed using multinomial logistic regression: (1) clinical model, (2) airway model, (3) lung model, (4) airway fusion model, and (5) lung fusion model. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with DeLong tests comparing model efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>35 airway tree and 48 lung radiomic features were ultimately selected. The best performing model was the lung fusion model, which integrated three clinical predictors (age, gender, and BMI) with selected lung radiomic features. In external test set, it achieved superior performance with AUCs of 0.939 (95% CI 0.898-0.979) for PFT-normal, 0.830 (0.758-0.902) for PRISm, and 0.904 (0.841-0.966) for COPD, with an overall accuracy of 83.59%. DeLong tests indicated that across all three datasets, the lung fusion model outperformed the other four models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining age, gender, BMI, and lung radiomic features significantly improves detection of PRISm and COPD compared to alternative models. These findings underscore the potential of CT-based radiomics for the early identification and risk stratification of abnormal pulmonary function.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02061-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are progressive respiratory disorders associated with accelerated pulmonary function decline and systemic comorbidities. This multicenter study aimed to develop a three-category classification model that integrates clinical variables with thoracic computed tomography (CT) radiomics to distinguish normal pulmonary function, PRISm, and COPD.

Methods: A total of 1018 participants from three centers (A, B, C) who underwent chest CT and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) within a 2-week interval were retrospectively analyzed. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 797 individuals were included for analysis (Center A: 667 [training/internal test = 534:133]; Centers B, C: 130 external test). CT images were preprocessed via resampling and intensity normalization, followed by semi-automated segmentation of the airway tree and whole lung parenchyma using Mimics Research. PyRadiomics extracted 2436 radiomic features (1218 per region). Feature selection combined maximum relevance minimum redundancy with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, employing tenfold cross-validation. Five models were developed using multinomial logistic regression: (1) clinical model, (2) airway model, (3) lung model, (4) airway fusion model, and (5) lung fusion model. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with DeLong tests comparing model efficacy.

Results: 35 airway tree and 48 lung radiomic features were ultimately selected. The best performing model was the lung fusion model, which integrated three clinical predictors (age, gender, and BMI) with selected lung radiomic features. In external test set, it achieved superior performance with AUCs of 0.939 (95% CI 0.898-0.979) for PFT-normal, 0.830 (0.758-0.902) for PRISm, and 0.904 (0.841-0.966) for COPD, with an overall accuracy of 83.59%. DeLong tests indicated that across all three datasets, the lung fusion model outperformed the other four models.

Conclusion: Combining age, gender, BMI, and lung radiomic features significantly improves detection of PRISm and COPD compared to alternative models. These findings underscore the potential of CT-based radiomics for the early identification and risk stratification of abnormal pulmonary function.

胸部CT成像与肺功能检查鉴别正常、棱镜和COPD的比较。
背景:保留比肺功能受损(PRISm)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是与肺功能加速下降和全身合并症相关的进行性呼吸系统疾病。这项多中心研究旨在建立一个将临床变量与胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)放射组学相结合的三类分类模型,以区分正常肺功能、PRISm和COPD。方法:回顾性分析来自三个中心(A、B、C)的1018名参与者,他们在2周的间隔内接受了胸部CT和肺功能检查(pft)。应用纳入和排除标准后,纳入797人进行分析(A中心:667人[培训/内部测试= 534:133];B、C中心:130人外部测试)。CT图像通过重采样和强度归一化进行预处理,然后使用Mimics Research对气道树和全肺实质进行半自动分割。PyRadiomics提取了2436个放射组特征(每个区域1218个)。特征选择结合了最大相关性、最小冗余、最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归,采用十倍交叉验证。采用多项logistic回归建立5个模型:(1)临床模型,(2)气道模型,(3)肺模型,(4)气道融合模型,(5)肺融合模型。性能指标包括准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),德隆试验比较模型疗效。结果:最终选择35个气道树和48个肺放射学特征。表现最好的模型是肺融合模型,它将三个临床预测指标(年龄、性别和BMI)与选定的肺放射学特征结合起来。在外部测试集中,PFT-normal的auc为0.939 (95% CI 0.898-0.979), PRISm的auc为0.830 (95% CI 0.758-0.902), COPD的auc为0.904(0.841-0.966),总体准确率为83.59%。DeLong测试表明,在所有三个数据集中,肺融合模型的表现优于其他四种模型。结论:与其他模型相比,结合年龄、性别、BMI和肺放射学特征可显著提高PRISm和COPD的检出率。这些发现强调了基于ct的放射组学在肺功能异常的早期识别和风险分层方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信