Affective dynamics and emotional reactivity in social anxiety disorder.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Beth Foote, Femke Lamers, Mike Xiao, Lihong Cui, Vadim Zipunnikov, Mathilde M Husky, Kathleen R Merikangas
{"title":"Affective dynamics and emotional reactivity in social anxiety disorder.","authors":"Beth Foote, Femke Lamers, Mike Xiao, Lihong Cui, Vadim Zipunnikov, Mathilde M Husky, Kathleen R Merikangas","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725000121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although heightened anxiety associated with social interaction or evaluation is the core diagnostic criterion for social anxiety disorder (SAD), there is growing evidence that SAD is characterized by more pervasive reactivity beyond social situations. We employed Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to describe the affective dynamics and emotional reactivity to daily events in a community-based sample of adults with SAD compared with other anxiety disorders, and controls without anxiety or mood disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 236 adults with a lifetime diagnosis of SAD (n = 53), other anxiety disorders (n = 120), and no mood or anxiety disorder (n = 63) based on comprehensive diagnostic interviews answered brief electronic interviews that assessed daily life events and mood and anxiety symptoms four times a day for two weeks. Linear mixed models were used to quantify reactivity to daily life events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Persons with SAD had higher average levels of sad and anxious mood than those with other anxiety disorders or controls. Irrespective of comorbid mood disorders, people with SAD also demonstrated significantly greater decreases in both sad and anxious mood following positive events, and a greater increase in anxious mood following negative, particularly non-social events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings regarding pervasive reactivity beyond the social context in people with SAD confirm the need for broader conceptualization of this disorder as well as expansion of interventions beyond the social context. This work also demonstrates the utility of EMA as a powerful tool to track individual variability and reactivity in daily life that can inform etiology, treatment and prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e242"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725000121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although heightened anxiety associated with social interaction or evaluation is the core diagnostic criterion for social anxiety disorder (SAD), there is growing evidence that SAD is characterized by more pervasive reactivity beyond social situations. We employed Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to describe the affective dynamics and emotional reactivity to daily events in a community-based sample of adults with SAD compared with other anxiety disorders, and controls without anxiety or mood disorders.

Methods: A sample of 236 adults with a lifetime diagnosis of SAD (n = 53), other anxiety disorders (n = 120), and no mood or anxiety disorder (n = 63) based on comprehensive diagnostic interviews answered brief electronic interviews that assessed daily life events and mood and anxiety symptoms four times a day for two weeks. Linear mixed models were used to quantify reactivity to daily life events.

Results: Persons with SAD had higher average levels of sad and anxious mood than those with other anxiety disorders or controls. Irrespective of comorbid mood disorders, people with SAD also demonstrated significantly greater decreases in both sad and anxious mood following positive events, and a greater increase in anxious mood following negative, particularly non-social events.

Conclusions: Our findings regarding pervasive reactivity beyond the social context in people with SAD confirm the need for broader conceptualization of this disorder as well as expansion of interventions beyond the social context. This work also demonstrates the utility of EMA as a powerful tool to track individual variability and reactivity in daily life that can inform etiology, treatment and prevention.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社交焦虑障碍的情感动力与情绪反应。
背景:虽然与社交互动或评价相关的高度焦虑是社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的核心诊断标准,但越来越多的证据表明,SAD的特征是社交情境之外的更普遍的反应性。我们采用生态瞬间评估(EMA)来描述以社区为基础的成年SAD患者与其他焦虑症患者和无焦虑症或情绪障碍的对照组的情感动态和对日常事件的情绪反应。方法:236名成人样本,终身诊断为SAD (n = 53),其他焦虑障碍(n = 120),无情绪或焦虑障碍(n = 63),基于综合诊断访谈,回答简短的电子访谈,评估日常生活事件、情绪和焦虑症状,每天四次,持续两周。线性混合模型用于量化对日常生活事件的反应性。结果:SAD患者的悲伤和焦虑情绪平均水平高于其他焦虑症患者或对照组。不考虑共病性情绪障碍,SAD患者在积极事件后悲伤和焦虑情绪的显著下降,在消极事件,特别是非社交事件后焦虑情绪的显著增加。结论:我们关于SAD患者在社会环境之外的普遍反应的研究结果证实了对这种疾病进行更广泛的概念化以及扩大社会环境之外的干预措施的必要性。这项工作还证明了EMA作为一种强大工具的效用,可以跟踪日常生活中的个体变异性和反应性,从而为病因、治疗和预防提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信