{"title":"Dissociative effects of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different social value orientations.","authors":"Shenghao Shi, Tao Ding, Peihua Xian, Zhiyuan Liu","doi":"10.1177/17470218251378074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-other risky decision-making is of general concern to researchers. However, the findings on self-other risky decision-making were inconsistent, which suggested that situational factors and the subject's personality traits need to be considered. Based on three studies with 588 subjects, we explored the influence of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different social value orientations (SVOs). Both the large sample questionnaires in Study 1 and the laboratory experiment in Study 2 found that the proself (low SVO) group had a higher risk-taking tendency when making decisions for others than for themselves. Study 2 further revealed that the proself group exhibited lower decision quality and weaker negative emotion for loss outcomes when making decisions for others than for themselves. Although the above effects disappeared in the prosocial (high SVO) group, Study 3 indicated that the above differential effects in the proself group were enhanced between making decisions for themselves and for strangers, and weakened between themselves and friends. This study highlighted the dissociative effects of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different SVOs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251378074"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251378074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Self-other risky decision-making is of general concern to researchers. However, the findings on self-other risky decision-making were inconsistent, which suggested that situational factors and the subject's personality traits need to be considered. Based on three studies with 588 subjects, we explored the influence of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different social value orientations (SVOs). Both the large sample questionnaires in Study 1 and the laboratory experiment in Study 2 found that the proself (low SVO) group had a higher risk-taking tendency when making decisions for others than for themselves. Study 2 further revealed that the proself group exhibited lower decision quality and weaker negative emotion for loss outcomes when making decisions for others than for themselves. Although the above effects disappeared in the prosocial (high SVO) group, Study 3 indicated that the above differential effects in the proself group were enhanced between making decisions for themselves and for strangers, and weakened between themselves and friends. This study highlighted the dissociative effects of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different SVOs.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.