Dissociative effects of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different social value orientations.

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Shenghao Shi, Tao Ding, Peihua Xian, Zhiyuan Liu
{"title":"Dissociative effects of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different social value orientations.","authors":"Shenghao Shi, Tao Ding, Peihua Xian, Zhiyuan Liu","doi":"10.1177/17470218251378074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-other risky decision-making is of general concern to researchers. However, the findings on self-other risky decision-making were inconsistent, which suggested that situational factors and the subject's personality traits need to be considered. Based on three studies with 588 subjects, we explored the influence of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different social value orientations (SVOs). Both the large sample questionnaires in Study 1 and the laboratory experiment in Study 2 found that the proself (low SVO) group had a higher risk-taking tendency when making decisions for others than for themselves. Study 2 further revealed that the proself group exhibited lower decision quality and weaker negative emotion for loss outcomes when making decisions for others than for themselves. Although the above effects disappeared in the prosocial (high SVO) group, Study 3 indicated that the above differential effects in the proself group were enhanced between making decisions for themselves and for strangers, and weakened between themselves and friends. This study highlighted the dissociative effects of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different SVOs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251378074"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251378074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-other risky decision-making is of general concern to researchers. However, the findings on self-other risky decision-making were inconsistent, which suggested that situational factors and the subject's personality traits need to be considered. Based on three studies with 588 subjects, we explored the influence of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different social value orientations (SVOs). Both the large sample questionnaires in Study 1 and the laboratory experiment in Study 2 found that the proself (low SVO) group had a higher risk-taking tendency when making decisions for others than for themselves. Study 2 further revealed that the proself group exhibited lower decision quality and weaker negative emotion for loss outcomes when making decisions for others than for themselves. Although the above effects disappeared in the prosocial (high SVO) group, Study 3 indicated that the above differential effects in the proself group were enhanced between making decisions for themselves and for strangers, and weakened between themselves and friends. This study highlighted the dissociative effects of psychological distance on self-other risky decision-making in individuals with different SVOs.

EXPRESS:心理距离对不同社会价值取向个体自我-他者风险决策的解离效应。
自我-他人风险决策是研究者普遍关注的问题。然而,自我-他人风险决策的结果并不一致,这表明情境因素和被试的人格特质需要考虑。本文通过对588名被试的3项研究,探讨了心理距离对不同社会价值取向个体自我-他者风险决策的影响。研究1的大样本问卷调查和研究2的实验室实验均发现,低SVO组在为他人决策时比为自己决策时具有更高的冒险倾向。研究2进一步发现,专业组在为他人决策时表现出较低的决策质量和较弱的损失结果负性情绪。研究3表明,亲社会(高SVO)组的上述差异效应在为自己和为陌生人做决策时增强,在为自己和为朋友做决策时减弱。本研究强调了心理距离对不同特殊情感障碍个体的自我-他者风险决策的解离效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信