Fruit and vegetable intake in minority ethnic groups in the UK: analysis from 'Understanding Society' and UK Biobank.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Pooja Shah, Mayada Demashkieh, Basma Ellahi, Hibbah Osei-Kwasi, Sophia D Amenyah, Reena Vijayakumaran, Jane Murphy, Rebecca Hardy
{"title":"Fruit and vegetable intake in minority ethnic groups in the UK: analysis from 'Understanding Society' and UK Biobank.","authors":"Pooja Shah, Mayada Demashkieh, Basma Ellahi, Hibbah Osei-Kwasi, Sophia D Amenyah, Reena Vijayakumaran, Jane Murphy, Rebecca Hardy","doi":"10.1017/S136898002510102X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine differences in fruit and vegetable intake and food insecurity between Black African and Caribbean and South Asian (Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi) ethnic minority groups with a White British/Irish reference population in the UK. This study was part of the TANGERINE project (nuTritional heAlth aNd aGeing in oldER ethnIc miNoritiEs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal analysis using multilevel logistic regression from Understanding Society and a cross-sectional comparison with UK Biobank.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Understanding Society waves 2 (2010-2012), 5 (2013-2015), 7 (2015-2017), 9 (2017-2019) 11 (2019-2021) and 13 (2021-2023). UK Biobank baseline data (2006-2010).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Understanding Society: adults aged 16 years and above (approximately 44 000 households). UK Biobank: participants aged 37-73 years (<i>n</i> = 502 412).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At wave 2, African, Caribbean, Pakistani and Bangladeshi participants in Understanding Society had lower odds of daily vegetable intake than White British/Irish participants, with Pakistanis showing the lowest intake. These disparities persisted after adjusting for socio-economic position (SEP) at individual and area levels, particularly for Caribbean and Pakistani groups. Indians consistently had higher odds of vegetable intake. Ethnic differences in fruit intake were smaller and largely attenuated by SEP adjustment. Food insecurity was more prevalent in all ethnic minority groups (except Indians) and associated with lower vegetable and fruit intake, though SEP explains more of the ethnic difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ethnic differences in fruit and vegetable intake are at least partially explained by SEP, with persistent vegetable consumption disparities after adjustment. Culturally tailored interventions addressing affordability, accessibility and SEP disparities are needed to improve dietary behaviours among minority ethnic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898002510102X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine differences in fruit and vegetable intake and food insecurity between Black African and Caribbean and South Asian (Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi) ethnic minority groups with a White British/Irish reference population in the UK. This study was part of the TANGERINE project (nuTritional heAlth aNd aGeing in oldER ethnIc miNoritiEs).

Design: Longitudinal analysis using multilevel logistic regression from Understanding Society and a cross-sectional comparison with UK Biobank.

Setting: Understanding Society waves 2 (2010-2012), 5 (2013-2015), 7 (2015-2017), 9 (2017-2019) 11 (2019-2021) and 13 (2021-2023). UK Biobank baseline data (2006-2010).

Participants: Understanding Society: adults aged 16 years and above (approximately 44 000 households). UK Biobank: participants aged 37-73 years (n = 502 412).

Results: At wave 2, African, Caribbean, Pakistani and Bangladeshi participants in Understanding Society had lower odds of daily vegetable intake than White British/Irish participants, with Pakistanis showing the lowest intake. These disparities persisted after adjusting for socio-economic position (SEP) at individual and area levels, particularly for Caribbean and Pakistani groups. Indians consistently had higher odds of vegetable intake. Ethnic differences in fruit intake were smaller and largely attenuated by SEP adjustment. Food insecurity was more prevalent in all ethnic minority groups (except Indians) and associated with lower vegetable and fruit intake, though SEP explains more of the ethnic difference.

Conclusions: Ethnic differences in fruit and vegetable intake are at least partially explained by SEP, with persistent vegetable consumption disparities after adjustment. Culturally tailored interventions addressing affordability, accessibility and SEP disparities are needed to improve dietary behaviours among minority ethnic groups.

英国少数民族的水果和蔬菜摄入量:来自“理解社会”和英国生物银行的分析。
目的:研究英国黑人、加勒比人和南亚(印度人、巴基斯坦人和孟加拉国人)少数民族与白人(英国人)参考人群在水果和蔬菜摄入量和食品不安全方面的差异。这项研究是TANGERINE项目(老年少数民族的营养健康和老龄化)的一部分。设计:纵向分析使用理解社会的多水平逻辑回归,并与英国生物银行进行横断面比较。背景:了解社会浪潮2(2010-2012)、5(2013-2015)、7(2015-2017)、9(2017-2019)、11(2019-2021)、13(2021-2023)。英国生物库基线数据(2006-2010年)。参与者:了解社会:16岁及以上的成年人(约44,000户)。UK Biobank:参与者年龄37-73岁(n=502,412)。结果:在第二波,非洲人、加勒比人、巴基斯坦人和孟加拉国人在“理解社会”中的每日蔬菜摄入量低于英国/爱尔兰白人参与者,巴基斯坦人的摄入量最低。在个人和地区层面调整社会经济地位(SEP)后,这些差异仍然存在,特别是加勒比和巴基斯坦群体。印度人一直有较高的蔬菜摄入量。水果摄入量的种族差异较小,经SEP调整后基本减弱。食品不安全在所有少数民族群体(印度人除外)中更为普遍,并与蔬菜和水果摄入量较低有关,尽管SEP更多地解释了种族差异。结论:蔬果摄入量的种族差异至少部分可以用SEP解释,调整后的蔬菜消费差异持续存在。需要针对可负担性、可及性和SEP差异的文化量身定制干预措施来改善少数民族群体的饮食行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信