Relapse rates in stable obsessive-compulsive disorder after antidepressant discontinuation versus maintenance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Taro Kishi, Kenji Sakuma, Masakazu Hatano, Shun Hamanaka, Yasufumi Nishii, Nakao Iwata
{"title":"Relapse rates in stable obsessive-compulsive disorder after antidepressant discontinuation versus maintenance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Taro Kishi, Kenji Sakuma, Masakazu Hatano, Shun Hamanaka, Yasufumi Nishii, Nakao Iwata","doi":"10.1017/S0033291725101578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal duration for maintaining antidepressant treatment in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who achieve symptom stabilization remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials (DBRPCTs) compared antidepressant maintenance and antidepressant discontinuation groups in terms of relapse rate at each DBRPCT study endpoint (primary outcome), OCD symptom improvement, all-cause discontinuation, and adverse event-related discontinuation. Furthermore, relapse rates at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks were compared between the groups. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) and number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) for relapse rates were also estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine trials (n = 1084; mean age: 32.8 years; proportion of males: 53.3%) were included. The antidepressant maintenance group had lower relapse rates at each DBRPCT study endpoint (RR [95% CI] = 0.53 [0.42-0.68]; ARR = 21.0%; NNTB = 5) and lower all-cause and adverse event-related discontinuation rates than the antidepressant discontinuation group. The maintenance group also exhibited lower relapse rates at 4 weeks (RR [95% CI] = 0.47 [0.31-0.70]; ARR: not significant; NNTB: not significant), 8 weeks (0.42 [0.31-0.57]; 12.0%; 8), 12 weeks (0.43 [0.32-0.56]; 18.0%; 6), 16 weeks (0.41 [0.32-0.52]; 25.0%; 4), 20 weeks (0.43 [0.34-0.53]; 26.0%; 4), and 24 weeks (0.42 [0.33-0.52]; 27.0%; 4) than the discontinuation group. Moreover, the maintenance group outperformed the discontinuation group regarding OCD symptom improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with OCD may benefit from continued antidepressant treatment, provided that it is well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e252"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291725101578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal duration for maintaining antidepressant treatment in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) who achieve symptom stabilization remains unclear.

Methods: This systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials (DBRPCTs) compared antidepressant maintenance and antidepressant discontinuation groups in terms of relapse rate at each DBRPCT study endpoint (primary outcome), OCD symptom improvement, all-cause discontinuation, and adverse event-related discontinuation. Furthermore, relapse rates at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks were compared between the groups. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) and number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) for relapse rates were also estimated.

Results: Nine trials (n = 1084; mean age: 32.8 years; proportion of males: 53.3%) were included. The antidepressant maintenance group had lower relapse rates at each DBRPCT study endpoint (RR [95% CI] = 0.53 [0.42-0.68]; ARR = 21.0%; NNTB = 5) and lower all-cause and adverse event-related discontinuation rates than the antidepressant discontinuation group. The maintenance group also exhibited lower relapse rates at 4 weeks (RR [95% CI] = 0.47 [0.31-0.70]; ARR: not significant; NNTB: not significant), 8 weeks (0.42 [0.31-0.57]; 12.0%; 8), 12 weeks (0.43 [0.32-0.56]; 18.0%; 6), 16 weeks (0.41 [0.32-0.52]; 25.0%; 4), 20 weeks (0.43 [0.34-0.53]; 26.0%; 4), and 24 weeks (0.42 [0.33-0.52]; 27.0%; 4) than the discontinuation group. Moreover, the maintenance group outperformed the discontinuation group regarding OCD symptom improvement.

Conclusions: Individuals with OCD may benefit from continued antidepressant treatment, provided that it is well tolerated.

稳定型强迫症在停用抗抑郁药与维持抗抑郁药后的复发率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:强迫症(OCD)患者达到症状稳定后维持抗抑郁治疗的最佳持续时间尚不清楚。方法:本研究对双盲随机安慰剂对照试验(DBRPCT)进行了系统回顾和两两荟萃分析,比较了维持抗抑郁药组和停药组在每个DBRPCT研究终点(主要结局)、强迫症症状改善、全因停药和不良事件相关停药的复发率。此外,比较各组在4、8、12、16、20和24周的复发率。计算95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(rr)。对复发率的绝对风险降低(ARR)和从治疗到受益(NNTB)所需的数量也进行了估计。结果:纳入9项试验(n = 1084,平均年龄32.8岁,男性比例53.3%)。抗抑郁维持组在DBRPCT各研究终点的复发率较低(RR [95% CI] = 0.53 [0.42-0.68]; ARR = 21.0%; NNTB = 5),全因停药率和不良事件相关停药率均低于停药组。维持组的复发率在4周(RR [95% CI] = 0.47 [0.31-0.70]; ARR:无统计学意义;NNTB:无统计学意义)、8周(0.42[0.31-0.57];12.0%;8)、12周(0.43[0.32-0.56];18.0%;6)、16周(0.41[0.32-0.52];25.0%;4)、20周(0.43[0.34-0.53];26.0%;4)和24周(0.42[0.33-0.52];27.0%;4)均低于停药组。此外,维持组在强迫症症状改善方面优于停药组。结论:强迫症患者可以从持续抗抑郁治疗中获益,前提是其耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信