RNA binding and coacervation promote preservation of peptide form and function across the heterochiral-homochiral divide.

IF 5.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Protein Science Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1002/pro.70273
Manas Seal, Ilan Edelstein, Yosef Scolnik, Orit Weil-Ktorza, Norman Metanis, Yaakov Levy, Liam M Longo, Daniella Goldfarb
{"title":"RNA binding and coacervation promote preservation of peptide form and function across the heterochiral-homochiral divide.","authors":"Manas Seal, Ilan Edelstein, Yosef Scolnik, Orit Weil-Ktorza, Norman Metanis, Yaakov Levy, Liam M Longo, Daniella Goldfarb","doi":"10.1002/pro.70273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent evidence suggests that peptide-RNA coacervates may have buffered the emergence of folded domains from flexible peptides. As primitive peptides were likely composed of both L- and D-amino acids, we hypothesized that coacervates may have also supported the emergence of chiral control. To test this hypothesis, we compared the coacervation propensities of an isotactic (homochiral) peptide and a syndiotactic (alternating chirality) peptide, both with an identical sequence derived from the ancient helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motif. Using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we found that the syndiotactic peptide does not form stable dimers with high α-helicity in solution, unlike the isotactic peptide. However, both peptides do coacervate with RNA, albeit with distinct reentrant phase behaviors. Coacervation in each case is facilitated by oligomer formation, likely dimerization, upon RNA binding that promotes RNA cross-linking. Additionally, RNA cross-linking and coacervation of the syndiotactic peptide may involve α-helical conformations, according to atomistic MD simulations. Coarse-grained MD simulations indicate that the differences in reentrant phase behavior of isotactic and syndiotactic peptides are associated with differences in dimer flexibility and stability, which modulate the strength of peptide-peptide and peptide-RNA interactions and, consequently, the effectiveness of RNA cross-linking. These results illustrate how RNA binding and/or coacervation by early proteins could have promoted the transition of flexible, heterochiral peptides into folded, homochiral domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":20761,"journal":{"name":"Protein Science","volume":"34 9","pages":"e70273"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12375978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protein Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that peptide-RNA coacervates may have buffered the emergence of folded domains from flexible peptides. As primitive peptides were likely composed of both L- and D-amino acids, we hypothesized that coacervates may have also supported the emergence of chiral control. To test this hypothesis, we compared the coacervation propensities of an isotactic (homochiral) peptide and a syndiotactic (alternating chirality) peptide, both with an identical sequence derived from the ancient helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motif. Using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we found that the syndiotactic peptide does not form stable dimers with high α-helicity in solution, unlike the isotactic peptide. However, both peptides do coacervate with RNA, albeit with distinct reentrant phase behaviors. Coacervation in each case is facilitated by oligomer formation, likely dimerization, upon RNA binding that promotes RNA cross-linking. Additionally, RNA cross-linking and coacervation of the syndiotactic peptide may involve α-helical conformations, according to atomistic MD simulations. Coarse-grained MD simulations indicate that the differences in reentrant phase behavior of isotactic and syndiotactic peptides are associated with differences in dimer flexibility and stability, which modulate the strength of peptide-peptide and peptide-RNA interactions and, consequently, the effectiveness of RNA cross-linking. These results illustrate how RNA binding and/or coacervation by early proteins could have promoted the transition of flexible, heterochiral peptides into folded, homochiral domains.

RNA的结合和凝聚促进了多肽形式和功能在异手性-同手性分裂中的保存。
最近的证据表明,肽rna凝聚体可能缓冲了柔性肽折叠结构域的出现。由于原始肽可能由L-和d -氨基酸组成,我们假设凝聚体也可能支持手性控制的出现。为了验证这一假设,我们比较了一种同规(同手性)肽和一种异规(交替手性)肽的聚集倾向,这两种肽都具有源自古老的螺旋-发夹-螺旋(HhH)基序的相同序列。利用电子顺磁共振(EPR)光谱和原子分子动力学(MD)模拟,我们发现与等规肽不同,双规肽在溶液中不形成具有高α-螺旋度的稳定二聚体。然而,这两种肽确实与RNA凝聚,尽管具有不同的重入相行为。在每种情况下,通过RNA结合促进RNA交联的低聚物形成(可能是二聚体)促进了聚集。此外,根据原子动力学模拟,RNA交联和共聚肽的凝聚可能涉及α-螺旋构象。粗粒度的MD模拟表明,等规肽和双规肽重入相行为的差异与二聚体灵活性和稳定性的差异有关,二聚体的灵活性和稳定性调节了肽-肽和肽-RNA相互作用的强度,从而影响了RNA交联的有效性。这些结果说明了早期蛋白质的RNA结合和/或凝聚如何促进了柔性的异手性肽向折叠的同手性结构域的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Protein Science
Protein Science 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Protein Science, the flagship journal of The Protein Society, is a publication that focuses on advancing fundamental knowledge in the field of protein molecules. The journal welcomes original reports and review articles that contribute to our understanding of protein function, structure, folding, design, and evolution. Additionally, Protein Science encourages papers that explore the applications of protein science in various areas such as therapeutics, protein-based biomaterials, bionanotechnology, synthetic biology, and bioelectronics. The journal accepts manuscript submissions in any suitable format for review, with the requirement of converting the manuscript to journal-style format only upon acceptance for publication. Protein Science is indexed and abstracted in numerous databases, including the Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Embase (Elsevier), Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest), MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM), Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), and SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信